COMPETENCY MODEL FOR IMPROVEMENT MEDICAL UNIVERSITY TEACHER’S QUALIFICATION

Despite the huge advantages of introducing a professional standard, a number of contradictions in the formation and development of a professional trajectory of medical university teacher’s activity were not avoided. These contradictions were caused by the lack of uniform universal competencies of a university teacher, the multiformity and diversity of existing competences, the lack of an approved National Qualifications Framework, which would serve as a regulating link between qualifications by education and professional qualifications. The ratio of the following blocks will be included in the competence model of medical school teacher: the level of professional and job status; the category of a teacher depending on the discipline being taught; competences (administrative-service, communicative, educational-methodical – general teaching, special professional). Teacher training programs should be modular, with a division into a universal module and a special module. The universal module can be used as a separate program, and it can be one of the modules of other professional development programs (aimed at developing general teaching competences). The special module is aimed at the formation and development of special professional pedagogical competences.

1. Lenkov, S.L. (2016). [Dynamic Activity-Based Competence Model of Professionalism of Innovative Teacher]. Nauchnyy dialog. No. 4 (52), pp. 337-360. (In Russ.)

2. Karavaeva, E.V. (2017). [Qualifications of Higher Education and Professional Qualifications: Harmonization with Efforts]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 12 (218), pp. 5-12. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

3. Verbitsky, A.A. (2014). [Teacher as a Main Subject of the Educational Reform]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 4, pp. 13-20. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

4. Bednyi, B.I. (2017). [A New Postgraduate School Model: Pro et Contra]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 4(211), pp. 5-17. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

5. Bednyi, B.I. (2016). [On the Issue of the Goal of Postgraduate Training (Dissertation vs Qualification)]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 3(199), pp. 44-52. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

6. Bednyi, B.I., Rybakov, N.V., Sapunov, M.B. (2017). [Doctoral Education in Russia in the Educational Field: Interdisciplinary Discourse]. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya = Sociological Studies. No. 9, pp. 125-134. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

7. Senashenko, V.S. (2016). [Problems of Postgraduate Training Organization on the Basis of the Federal State Educational Standards of the Third Level of Higher Education]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 3(199), pp. 33-43. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

8. Lazarenko, V.A., Nikishina, V.B., Petrash, E.A. (2014). [Competence Model of Evaluating the Effectiveness of Interactions between Structural Units of the University]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis. No 3, pp. 49-57. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

9. Prirodova, O.F., Nikishina, V.B., Kuznetsova, A.A. (2017). [Continuous Pedagogical Education Modeling of Medical University Teachers]. Professional’noe obrazovanie v Rossii i za rubezhom = Professional Education in Russia and Abroad. No. 2 (26), pp. 60-68. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

10. Shestak, N.V. (2016). [Speech at the Round Table Discussion «Teaching Staff Training, Higher School Pedagogy, and Engineering Pedagogy»]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 6(202), pp. 62-86. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)