Paradoxes in The Approach to Faculty Remuneration in Private Universities
Abstract
The article discusses the existing practice of faculty remuneration in private universities and the possible directions of its improvement. The author substantiates the thesis that this category of institutions of higher professional education, instead of implementing innovative and truly effective technologies to motivate faculty staff uses “pseudo market” approach – to keep their average earnings at a level slightly higher than the same level in state universities. The negative consequence of this strategic approach is personnel demotivation and decrease of loyalty level because the remuneration
schemes are unified and do not permit to take into consideration teacher’s individual achievements. The analysis shows that the existing faculty remuneration practice doesn’t ensure the balance between economic and social interests. The employers strive to get maximum efficiency from the faculty staff at minimal costs. The paper shows three possible models of faculty behavior in these conditions. All these models demonstrate personnel demotivation, which causes the loss of education quality. The paper gives recommendations for changing both the strategy and tactics of
motivation of private universities faculty based on the implementation of self-financing approach and the calculation of the ratio of teacher’s personal effectiveness.
About the Author
A. R. AlaverdovRussian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Economics), Prof., Chief of Department of Human Resource Management
References
1. Alaverdov, A.R. (2015). [Evolution of Strategic Approaches to Motivation of the University Teaching Staff]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 5, pp. 45-53. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
2. Torgashev, V.A. Chto imeli ne tsenili, poteryali … plakali [What We Did Not Value, We Have Lost and Now Are Crying]. Available at: http://greenkomitet.ru/forum/blogs/ratcatcher-47-next.htm (accessed 04.02.18)
3. Statisticheskij spravochnik CSU SSSR o razvitii narodnogo hozjajstva SSSR v 1920-h – 1955 gg. [Statistical Yearbook of the CSO of the USSR about the Development of the National Economy of the USSR in the 1920s – 1955] (RGAE. F. 1562. Op. 41. D. 113. L. 1-291).
4. SSSR v tsifrakh v 1975: kratkii statisticheskii sbornik [USSR in Figures in 1975: Short Statistical Book. Central Statistical Department at the Council of Ministers of the USSR. Moscow, 1976. 238 p.
5. Rosstat: onlajn-sbornik «Rossija v cifrah» [Rosstat: The Online Collection “Russia in Figures”. 2017. Available at: https://nangs.org/analytics/rosstat-onlajn-sbornik-rossiya-v-tsifrakh-vypusk-2017-goda-pdf
6. Krasinskaya, L.F. (2016). [Modernization, Optimization, Bureaucratization ...What Awaits Higher School Tomorrow?]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 3, pp. 73-82. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
7. Baranova, I.P. (2014). [Motivation and Disciplinary Relations between University Employees]. In: Collection of Scientific Works of the Department of Human Resource Management. Moscow Financial-Industrial University “Synergy”. Pp. 336-343.
8. Moskvina, N.B. (2014). [Higher School Teacher’s Professional Activity: Problem of the Destruction of Meanings]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 12, pp. 36-42. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
9.
10.