Preview

Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia

Advanced search

Master’s Degree Environment as a Space for Personal Professional Development of Students and Professors

Abstract

The article considers the characteristics of master’s degree studies in education as a separate stage of University education which distinguish them from bachelor’s programs. It also presents the results of a poll conducted among master’s students, which make it possible to draw a portrait of a student, find out his motivation for learning, his expectations, impressions, difficulties, and the effects of the first months of training. An average age of students is 34 years, most of them work as teachers. They are pedagogues-practitioners with different records of work. But there is a large category of students who don’t have a Bachelor’s degree in education. The survey shows that this group experiences perceptible difficulties and needs individual programs and formats of learning. The group of teachers with long records of work experiences more difficulties than the young ones as they have already lost their learning skills to a large extent. The students have marked out the educational effects of the first months of training such as reflexivity, a kind of uncertainty, mismatch, mistiming. This is caused by a fact that the ordinary state is being replaced with the situation of cognitive
dissonance, reflective trap which becomes a high-power impulse for further self-development. The paper also discusses the methods of active learning and views the models of organization of collaborative activities between teacher and students and substantiates the need to replace the authoritarian model of interaction between professor and master’s degree students with the one based on communication, cooperation and designing. This model implies the dual position of a teacher – as an organizer and a participant of communication. The most suitable technology to realize studentcentered learning is problem-based learning.

About the Author

S. I. Pozdeeva
Tomsk State Pedagogical University, Tomsk, Russia; Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Pedagogy), Prof., the Department of Primary Education


References

1. Senashenko, V.S., Pykhtina, N.A. (2017). [Continuity of Undergraduate and Graduate Programs as a Key Factor of the Quality Assurance in Higher Education]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 12 (218), pp. 13-25. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

2. Mukhametzyanova, F.G., Panchenko, O.I., Khairutdinov, R.R. (2017). [Magistracy as a Methodological Phenomenon: Challenges of Modernity]. Chelovek i obrazovanie [Man and Education]. No. 3, pp. 9-14. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

3. Pozdeeva, S.I. (2017). [University Teacher: Methodologist, Researcher, Novator?]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 3 (210), pp. 52-58. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

4. Polupan, K.L. (2017). [Reconstruction of Pedagogical Activities in Higher Education]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 2 (209), pp. 45-51. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

5. Polupan, K.L. (2017). [Technology of Partnership: Its Advantages and Challenges in the Implementation of Educational Programs at University]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 11 (217), pp. 116-121. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

6. Plotnikova, N.N., Pozdeeva, S. I. (2015). Forms of Organizing Collective Educational Activity in Primary School. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 214, pp. 51-58.

7. Zagrekova, L.V., Nikolina, V.V. (2004). Teoriya i tekhnologiya obucheniya [Theory and Technology of Teaching: A Manual for Institutions of Higher Education]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola Publ., 232 p. (In Russ.)

8. Zmeyev, S.I. (2002). Tekhnologia obuchenia vzroslykh [Technology of Adult Education]. Moscow: Akademiya Publ., 128 p. (In Russ.)

9. Mierin’, L.A., Bykova, N.N., Zarukina, E.V. (2015). Sovremennie obrazovatelnye tekhnologii (opyt inzhenernogo vuza) [Modern Educational Technologies Implementation at University: Study Guide]. St. Petersburg: Saint-Petersburg State University of Economics Publ., 169 p. (In Russ.)

10. Kirilyuk, L.G., Krasnova, T.I., Karpievich, E.F. (2008). Programma uchebnogo kursa kak putevoditel dlya studenta i prepodavatelya [Academic Syllabus as a Guide for a Student and a Teacher]. Minsk, BGU Publ. 211 p. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

11. Tyagunova, T.V. (2008). [Joint “Doing” of Academic Lesson]. In: Analiz obrazovatelnykh situatsii: sb. nauch. st. [Analysis of Educational Situations: Collection of papers]. A.M. Korbut and A.A. Polonnikov (Eds). Minsk: BGU Publ., pp. 92- 135. (In Russ.)

12. Halford E., Lea J. From Teaching to Learning: How Quality Assurance in UK Higher Education Has Responded to This Shift by Promoting a Culture of Enhancement. Available at: http://eua.be/Libraries/eqaf- 2014/Ib_6_Halford_Lea.pdf?sfvrsn=0

13. Kazoka, A., Nordal, E. Student-Centеred Learning and Quality Education: The Implementation of Student-Centеred Learning in Quality Assurance Procedures. Available at: http://eua.be/Libraries/eqaf-2014/II_3_Kazoka_Nordal_Student_centred_paper.pdf?sfvrsn=0

14. Student-Centеred Learning. Toolkit for Students, Staff and Higher Education Institutions ESU. Brussels, October 2010. Available at: http://www.esib.org/documents/publications/SCL_toolkit_ESU_EI.pdf

15. Pozdeeva, S.I (2016). [Working-outs for Problem-Based Learning in Training a Teacher of a Primary School]. Sibirskiy Uchitel [Siberian Teacher]. No. 2, pp. 35-40 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.


Review

Views: 521


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0869-3617 (Print)
ISSN 2072-0459 (Online)