MODERNIZATION OF THE THREE-CYCLE ENGINEERING EDUCATION BASED ON FSES 3++ AND CDIO++
Abstract
The paper proposes an approach to modernization of engineering programs at three cycles of higher education (bachelor, master, doctor) based on the CDIO++ Standards developed in Russia in the conditions of transferring to a new version of the Federal State Educational Standards (FSES 3++). The CDIO++ Standards are represented by a CDIO-FCDI-FFCD triad taking into account the differences between complex, innovative and research engineering activity. The peculiarity of the three-cycle engineering programs design based on the CDIO++ Standards is that program objectives and outcomes are defined considering the graduate training programs focus on various types of engineering activity at various stages of engineering products, processes and systems lifecycle. The modular structure of the programs is formed according to the FSES 3++ requirements. Each program module should contribute to achievement of the intended program outcomes. The program content, teaching and learning technologies, as well as the conditions of program delivery should meet the FSES 3++ and CDIO++ requirements. The developed approach is used being implemented in the Kuban State Technological University and is recommended to be used in other Russian universities, first and foremost in those participating in the “Worldwide CDIO++ Initiative”, as well as leading universities participating in the “5-100” programme aiming at preparation of academic and teaching staff (masters and doctors).
About the Author
A. I. Chuchalin
Kuban State Technological University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexandr I. Chuchalin – Dr. Sci. (Tech.), Prof., Rectorate Advisor
2,Moskovskaya str., Krasnodar, Krasnodarskiy kray, 350042
References
1. Crawle, E., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund, S., Brodeur, D., Edström, K. (2014). Rethinking Engineering Education: the CDIO Approach. 2nd Ed. Springer. 311 p.
2. Chuchalin, A.I., Tayurskaya, M.S. (2014). [Implementation of Federal Educational Standards and International Standards for Designing, Performing and Quality Evaluation of Engineering Educational Programmes]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 12, pp. 71-80. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
3. Chuchalin, A.I. (2016). [Application of the CDIO Approach to Three Level Engineering Programs Design]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 4, pp. 17-32. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
4. Vainshtein, Yu.V., Shershneva, V.A., Safonov, K.V. (2016). [CDIO Ideology in Math Training]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 2, pp. 75-82. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
5. Gafurova, N.V., Osipova, S.I. (2013). [Metallurgical Education in CDIO Ideology]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 12, pp. 137-139. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
6. Dolzhenko, R.A. (2017) [CDIO Concept as the Basis of Engineering Education: Interim Results and Directions for Further Use in Russia]. Izvestiya UGGU= News of the Ural State Mining University, no. 2 (46), pp. 104-108. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/kontseptsiya-cdio-kak-osnova-inzhenernogoobrazovaniyapromezhutochnye-itogi-i-napravleniya-dalneyshego-ispolzovaniya-v-rossii (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
7. Osipova, S.I., Rudnitskiy, E.A. (2015). [Integration of Stakeholders in the Implementation of CDIO Ideology]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 8/9, pp. 39-45. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
8. Podlesny, S.A., Kozlov, A.V. (2014). [CDIO: Objectives and Means of Achievement]. Inzhenernoe obrazovanie = Engineering Education, no. 16, pp. 9-13 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
9. Lunev, A., Fedotova, A., Rybakov, A. (2014). Complex Strategy of CDIO Initiative Implementation in a Regional Russian University. Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
10. Lunev, A., Zaripova, V., Petrova, I. (2013). Implementation of СDIO Initiative Approach at a Russian Regional University. Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
11. Petrovskaya, T. (2013). Using CDIO Concept to Develop Engineering Education in Tomsk Polytechnic University. Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
12. Rebrin, O., Sholina, I., Berestova, S. (2014). Interdisciplinary Project for Bachelor Engineering Program. Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
13. Rechistov, G., Plotkin, A. (2014). Computer Engineering Educational Projects of MIPT-Intel Laboratory in the Context of CDIO. Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
14. Antokhina, J., Olenev, V., Sheynin, Y. (2016). CDIO Implementation Experience for the Masters Training at SUAI. Proceedings of the 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland.
15. Chuchalin, A., Petrovskaya, T., Kulyukina, E., Tayurskaya, M. (2012). Benchmarking of TPU Academic Standard and CDIO Standards in Engineering Education. Proceedings of the 8th International CDIO Conference, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
16. Chuchalin, A.I., Daneikina, N.V. (2017). [Application of CDIO Approach to MSc and PhD Engineering Programs]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 4, pp. 17-25. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
17. Chuchalin, A., Daneikina, N., Fortin, C. (2016). Application of CDIO Approach to Engineering BEng, MSc and PhD Programs Design and Implementation. Proceedings of the 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland.
18. Chuchalin, A. (2017). Development of the CDIO Concept in Russia. Proceedings of the 4th IETEC Conference, Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam.
19. Chuchalin, A. Evolution of the CDIO Approach: BEng, MSc and PhD level. European Journal of Engineering Education. Published online: 04 Jan 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1422694
20. Chuchalin, A.I. (2014). [Academic Programme Objectives and Learning Outcomes]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 2, pp. 5-16. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
Review
Views:
670
Email this article 