EDUCATIONAL STANDARDS AND THE CRISIS OF EDUCATION
Abstract
The article analyzes the problems caused by the implementation of the modern Federal State Educational Standards of higher education. There is no doubt that FSES are necessary to support the educational space throughout the country, to govern the educational activities based on the unified legal framework, to provide, on the one hand, the continuity of the main educational programs, on the other hand, their variability. Meeting the requirements of standards is the condition of education quality assurance. Nevertheless, the current version of FSES has a number of serious conceptual weaknesses that become apparent in the practical application of standards. In particular, it is shown that FSES disregard the hierarchical nature of education. There are disciplines that do not form any competences but they are an essential theoretical basis for studying the other disciplines because there are necessary successive stages in education, e.g. medical or engineering. But this fact is disregarded in the current FSES. On the whole, the system crisis of the national education attended by the educational standards can be overcome through changing the approach to education and the revision of competences formulation in FSES. In this regard, it is important to take into account the specific character of educational activities, the hierarchical nature of education, and also students’ social and psychological qualities, as well as the necessary efforts of teaching staff.
About the Author
D. A. SevostyanovRussian Federation
Dmitry A. Sevostyanov – Cand. Sci. (Medical), Assoc. Prof., Department of personnel policy and personnel management
160, Dobrolyubova str., Novosibirsk, 630039
References
1. Korshunov, S.V. (2018). [The System of Standardization of Education in the Russian Federation Celebrates a Quarter Century]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 27. No. 3, pp. 23-37. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
2. Chomsky, N. (1972). [Language and Thinking]. Moscow: Publishing house of Moscow University. 123 p. (In Russ.)
3. Korol’kova, S.A. (2008). [Competence Approach in Vocational Training]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 6: Universitetskoe obrazovanie [Bulletin of Volgograd State University. Series 6: University Education]. No. 11, pp. 29-33. (In Russ.)
4. Bobienko, O.M. (2011). [Key Competencies of a Specialist in the Context of Globalization of the Economy]. URL: http://www.vivakadry.com/65.htm (In Russ.)
5. Abakumova, N.N., Malkova, I.YU. (2007). Kompetentnostnyi podkhod v obrazovanii: organizatsiya i diagnostika [Competence Approach in Education: Organization and Diagnostics]. Tomsk: Publishing house of Tomsk State University. 368 p. (In Russ.)
6. Verbitskii, A.A., Larionova, O.G. (2009). Lichnostnyi i kompetentnostnyi podkhody v obrazovanii:problemy integratsii [Personal and Competence Approaches in Education: Problems of Integration]. Moscow: Logos Publ. 336 p. (In Russ.)
7. Skibitskii, E.G., Tolstova, I.E., Kravchenko, I.I. (2011). Podgotovka gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal’nykh sluzhashchikh na osnove kompetentnostnogo podkhoda [Training of State and Municipal Employees on the Basis of Competence-Based Approach]. Novosibirsk: Publishing house of Novosibirsk State Agrarian University. 82 p. (In Russ.)
8. Shipilina, L.A. (2007). [Problems of Development of Higher Professional Education in Modern Conditions: Managerial and Methodological Aspect]. Psikhopedagogika v pravookhranitel’nykh organakh [Psychopedagogy in Law Enforcement Authorities]. No. 2, pp. 64-68. (In Russ.)