“Anti-plagiarism” System in Self-regulation of Scientific Activity
Abstract
The article presents the author’s position in the discussions that have intensified at the present time about the “Anti-plagiarism” system. The article correlates the functions of the system “Antiplagiarism” with the problems of scientific activity in the post-nonclassical period of the development of science. The author supports the thesis that the use of this system, even in the presence of certain defects, in the existing conditions is an objective necessity. The article discusses the most frequently mentioned problems of using “Anti-plagiarism” and gives objections to certain criticisms. The author formulates the conditions for the effective application of the system in scientific and educational practice such as: 1) content analysis of textual coincidence in research papers only for reference purposes, 2) decision-making about the acceptance of manuscript for publication based on the general principles of publication and research ethics, 3) differential treatment of textual coincidence depending on the level, character, and genre of a paper, 4) unified standards for preparation of research publications and academic papers. The scientific community has to work out professionally oriented regulations for application of technical means of verification in various spheres of science and education.
About the Author
N. I. Martishina
Siberian Transport University, Novosibirsk
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Prof., Chief of department “Philosophy and culturology”
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Prof., Chief of department “Philosophy and culturology”
References
1. Luk’yanenko, V. (2017). [Sedition and Heresy about «Antiplagiat»]. Uchitel’skaya gazeta [Teacher’s Newspaper]. No. 48, Nov. 28, p. 6. (In Russ.)
2. Engels, F. (1966). [The Letter to W. Borgius]. In: Marx K., Engels, F. Sochineniya [Collected Works]. Vol. 39. Moscow: Gospolitizdat Publ. Pp.174-177. (In Russ.)
3. Kuhn Т. (1998). [The Structure of Scientific Revolutions]. Transl. from Eng. Blagoveschensk: Blagoveschensky College of Humanities. 296 p. (In Russ.)
4. Hardwick, J. (1993) [The Role of Trust in Knowledge]. Sotsial’nye i gumanitarnye nauki: otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Ser. 8. Naukovedenie [Social and Human Sciences: Domestic and Foreign Literature. Series 8. Science on Science. No. 1, pp. 46-51. (In Russ.)
5. Broad, W., Wade, N. (1985). Betrayers of the Truth: Fraud and Deceit in Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 256 р.
6. Banerjea, D. (1988). Credibility and Ethics in Science. Science and culture. Calcutta. Vol. 54. No. 5, pp. 137-141.
7. Bazhanov, V.A. (1991). Nauka kak samopoznayushchaya sistema [The Science as a Self-Cognitive System]. Kazan: Kazan State Univ. Publ. 184 p. (In Russ.)
8. Levin, V.I. (2018). [Plagiarism, Its Essence and Measures to Prevent and Handle It]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 1 (219), pp. 143-150. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
9. Ignatova, M.N. (2012). [Plagiarism as a Threat to the Innovative Development of Society]. Naukovedenie [Science on Science]. No. 4. Available at: http://naukovedenie/ru: 52ЭВН412. (In Russ.)
10. Kicherova, M.N. (2013). [Ethos of Science in the Information Society]. Naukovedenie [Science on Science]. No.4. URL: http://naukovedenie/ru: 51ПВ413. (In Russ.)
11. Shmeleva, E.D. (2016). [Plagiarism and Cheating in Russian Universities]. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Education Issues]. No. 1, pp. 84-103. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
12. Avdeeva, N.V., Nikulina, O.V., Sologubov, A.M. (2012). [The System “Anti-Plagiarism of the RSL” and Unscrupulous Authors of Theses: Who Will Win?]. Nauchnaya periodika: problemy i resheniya = Scientific Periodicals: Problems and Solutions. No. 5 (11), pp. 11-16. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
13. Tkhagapsoev, H.G., Sapunov, M.B. (2016). [Russian Educational Reality and Its Converted Forms]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 6 (202), pp. 87-97. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
14. Chirkin, E.S. (2013). [The Use of Systems of Anti-Plagiarism in Education]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Tomsk State University]. Vol. 18. No. 6, pp. 3380-3387. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
15. Wager, E., Kleinert, S. (2011). Responsible Research Publication: International Standards for Authors: A Position Statement Developed at the 2nd World Conference on Research Integrity, Singapore, July 22-24, 2010. Available at: https://publicationethics.org/files/ International%20 standards_authors_for%20website_11_Nov_2011.pdf
16. Cohn, А., Breyer, М. (1966). [Typology in Scientific Research]. Fiziki shutyat [Physicists Are Joking]. Moscow: Mir Publ., pp. 57-63. (In Russ.)
Review
Views:
547
Email this article 