Ontology of Teamwork Competency and Approaches to Its Development at Engineering University
Abstract
The article addresses the question of the professional component in “teamwork skills”, which the authors consider to be of paramount importance when it comes to engineering activities. In this regard, the requirements of the professional standards for engineering activities and Federal State Educational Standards are compared. The gaps in the positions of employers and the academic community regarding this competency is recorded. From the general methodological and praxeological positions, the ontology of “teamwork” competency is considered in the article and the need to orient engineering universities to develop students’ teamwork skills as a professional competence is argued. The authors adduce the results of the 10-year experience of Gubkin Russian University of Oil and Gas in implementation of interdisciplinary trainings in a virtual environment of professional activity. During the trainings sessions the students acquire the necessary teamwork skills such as: 1) systemic vision of engineering activities in oil and gas complex, understanding of its goals, specificity, multidimensional nature, conflict of interests, principles of division of labor, 2) communication skills for interaction in interdisciplinary team , 3) the experience of joint analysis of problem situations and their solutions in conditions of limited information, uncertainty, conflict of participants’ interests, 4) assessment of project and managerial decisions. The proposed approach is based on the methodology of Organizational and Activity Games created by G.P. Shchedrovitsky in 1970s and developed by the Moscow Methodological Circle. This methodology is being applied for solving problem situations by teams in various areas of practices in conditions of limited information.
About the Authors
M. N. FilatovaRussian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Sociology), Prof., Vice Rector for Academic Affairs
V. S. Sheinbaum
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Engineering), Prof., Scientific director of the Institute of Personal Potential of the Fuel and Energy Complex
P. G. Shchedrovitsky
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Philosophy), the President of the Non-profit Research Foundation «Shchedrovitsky Institute for Development», Prof. at the Institute of Education
References
1. Sherwood, D. (2012). Videt’ les za derev’yami. Sistemnyi podkhod dlya sovershenstvovaniya biznes-modeli [Seeing the Forest for the Trees: A Manager’s Guide to Applying Systems Thinking]. . Transl. from Eng. Moscow: Alpina Publisher. (In Russ.)
2. Bazarov, T.Yu., Eremin, B.L. (2002). Upravlenie personalom [Personnel Management]. Moscow: UNITI Publ. 560 p. (In Russ.)
3. Grebnev, L.S. (2015). [General Cultural Competences and Educational Technologies]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 10, pp. 48-51. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.); Polupan, K.L. (2017). [Technology of Partnership: Its Advantages and Challenges in the Implementation at University]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossi = Higher Education in Russia. No.11 (217), рр. 116-121. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
4. Glazunova, E. (2012). [Formation of Team Working Skills as a General Competence of a Future Manager]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo Tekhnicheskogo Universiteta [The Bulletin of the Voronezh Technical University]. Vol. 8. No. 10-2, pp. 61-64. (In Russ.)
5. Malysheva, A. (2017). [Teamwork Skill as the Cultural Competence of University Students]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya [Modern Problems of Science and Education]. No. 2. Available at: http://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=26191 (In Russ.)
6. Polushkina, T., Kovalenko, E., Yakimovа, O. (2013). Sotsiologiya upravleniya: uchebnoe posobie [Sociology of Management: Study Book]. Moscow: Akademiya estestvoznaniya Publ. 301 p. (In Russ.)
7. Macintosh-Fletcher, D. (1996). Teaming by Design: Real Team for Real People. New York, VcGraw Hill.
8. Galkina, T. (2001). Sotsiologiya upravleniya: ot gruppy k komande [Sociology of Management: From Group to Team. Study Book]. Moscow: Finance and Statistics Publ., 221 p. (In Russ.)
9. Shchedrovitsky, G.P. (1995). [Initial Representations and Categorical Tools of the Theory of Activity]. In: G.P. Shchedrovitsky. Selected works. Moscow: Shkola kulturnoi politiki Publ., 800 p. (In Russ.)
10. Shchedrovetsky, P.G., Kuznetsov, Yu.V. (2014). [From Labor Division to Activity Division]. Filosofskie nauki = Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. No. 6, pp. 49-64. (In Russ.)
11. Sheinbaum, V.S. (2007). Metodologiya inzhenernoy dejatel’nosti. Uchebnoe posobie [Metho- dology of Engineering Work: Study Book]. Nizhni Novgorod, 360 p. (In Russ.)
12. Eremenko, V. (2004). [Team Creation and Development]. Upravlenie kompaniei [Company Management]. No. 1, pp. 36-41. (In Russ.)
13. Lorgina, N.N., Martynov, V.G., Scheinbaum, V.S. (2004). [Theory of Production of Semi-Finished Products and Its Applications to Higher and Secondary Professional Education]. Dopolnitel’noe professional’noe obrazovanie [Additional Professional Education]. No. 4. (In Russ.)
14. Vladimirov, A.I., Sheinbaum, V.S. (2007). [Preparation of Specialists in Virtual Reality of Professional Development as an Imperative]. Vysshee obrazovanie segodnya = Higher Education Today. No. 7, pp. 2-6. (In Russ.)
15. Sheinbaum, V.S. (2017). [Interdisciplinary Activity Training in Virtual Engineering Environment: An Actual State and Prospects]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 11 (217), pp. 61-68. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
16. Shchedrovitsky, P.G., Popov, S.V. (1994). [Game Movement and Organizational and Activity Games]. Voprosy metodologii [Questions of Methodology]. No.1-2, pp. 112-137. (In Russ.)