Preview

Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia

Advanced search

Culture of Critical Discourse on Education and Science

https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2018-27-7-20-27

Abstract

The article addresses the problems concerning the formation of the methodology of critical analysis of Russian strategies, which are aimed at reforming and managing of education and science on the basis of modern social science and Humanities studies and the principles of the interdisciplinary approach. The authors state the change of the critique vector – the transition from value-loaded political statements to scientific analysis of the objective factors determining social pathologies in education system. The situation today is characterized by the attempts to find and formulate an objectivated language to describe social reality. In particular, the researchers actively use the methodological potential of such concepts as “converted form”, “red tapes”, “Goodhart’s law”, “Thomas theorem” that are implemented as conceptual tools to comprehend and describe the specificity of educational system. The general meaning of the forming analytical strategy applied to education and science is that all the management actions are subject to “corrective” influence of these principles and laws. Within the framework of this approach critique of education (and the process of its reforming) is indivisible from the constructive analysis of education as a whole system with its immanent dimensions. This approach orients researchers towards studying the “ontological” and “essential” problems of education.

About the Authors

M. B. Sapunov
Московский политехнический университет
Russian Federation

Cand. Sci. (Philosophy), Assoc. Prof., Editor-in-Chief, Journal Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]



Kh. G. Tkhagapsoev
Kabardino-Balkar State University
Russian Federation

Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Prof., 

173, Chernyshevsky str., Nalchik, 360004, Kabardino-Balkarian Republic



References

1. Tkhagapsoev, Kh.G., Sapunov, M.B. (2016). [Russian Educational Reality and Its Converted Forms]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 6 (202), pp. 87-97. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

2. Trubnikova, E.I. (2018). [«Red Tape» in the Sphere of Science and Education]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 1 (219), pp. 108-121. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

3. Zakon Gudharta [Goodhart's Law]. Available at: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/законГудхарта (In Russ.); Goodhart, C.A.E. Problems of Monetary Management: The UK experience. Papers in Monetary Economics. Reserve Bank of Australia, 1975. Vol. I.

4. Teorema Tomasa [The Thomas Theorem] Available at: https://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/psihologic/1801 (In Russ.); Blumer, H. (2017). [Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method]. Transl. from Eng. Moscow: Elementarnye formy Publ. (In Russ.)

5. Martishina, N.I. (2018). [“Anti-plagiarism” System in Self-regulation of Scientific Activity]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 27. No. 6, pp. 50-57. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

6. Luk’yanenko, V. (2017). [Sedition and Heresy about «Antiplagiat»]. Uchitel’skaya gazeta [Teacher’s Newspaper]. No. 48, Nov. 28, p. 6. (In Russ.)

7. Tkhagapsoyev, Kh. G., Yakhutlov, M.M. (2014). [Problems of Engineering Education in Modern Russia: Methods of Analysis and Ways of Solving]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 8-9, pp. 27-36. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

8. Furs, V. (2001). [Paradigm of Critical Theory in Modern Philosophy: An Attempt to Explicate]. Logos [Logos]. No. 2, pp. 46-75. Available at: http://www.ruthenia.ru/logos/number/2001_2/03_2_2001.htm (In Russ.)

9. Sovremennaya sotsial’naya teoriya: Bourdieu, Giddens, Habermas [Modern Social Theory: Bourdieu, Giddens, Habermas]. Novosibirsk, 1995. (In Russ.)


Review

Views: 635


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0869-3617 (Print)
ISSN 2072-0459 (Online)