Educational “Looking Glass”, or “They” and “We”

One of the most important and, according to psychological and pedagogical literature, the least investigated aspects of the domestic system of higher education is the sphere of personal interrelations at the level “teacher – student”. The formation of this type of social relations is a complicated process equally depending on both interested sides, but it is this process that eventually determines the efficiency of the educational process. At present anonymous questioning of both students and teachers is by far the only method of high quality psychodiagnostics of this sphere of educational space. The received findings not only give a more comprehensive idea of the personal characteristics of modern students and the teaching staff of higher schools but can also provide some essential corrective amendments to the organization of the educational process. Anonymous questioning of 400 students of the medical and pediatric faculties of Kursk State Medical University (KSMU) has revealed a number of both quite predictable and fairly unexpected facts concerning the psychological atmosphere at the level “teacher – student”. The received findings to some extent alter the firmly established idea of an elevated ambitiousness of the modern generation of students. Corroborative to it is the objective fact of a lowered personal self-esteem in 38% questioned students of KSMU. The fact of the negative judgment of professional and personal qualities of some teachers (16% of respondents) is alarming and needing thorough consideration and practical conclusions. The comparatively low demand of the recommended to students main academic teaching manuals of the studied disciplines (56%) and the actually unclaimed lectures delivered to them (8%) can be to a great extent explained by their competitive disability in comparison with the short in form but superficial in the contents various kinds of “homebrew” guidance-manuals permanently ranking first in the teachers’ annual rating reports.

1. Krinchik, E.P. (2014). [The Academic Methodological Rethinking of the Actual Educational Process at a Single Higher Education Institution as an Important Component of the Institutional Research and Identity]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 14. Psikhologiya = Moscow University Psychology Bulletin. No. 4, pp. 142-153. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

2. Bulanova-Toporkova, M.V. (2002). Pedagogika i psikhologiya vysshei shkoly: uchebnoe posobie [Pedagogy and Psychology of Higher School: Tutorial]. Rostov n/Don: Phoenix Publ., 544 p. (In Russ.)

3. Martynenko, O.O., Korotina, O.A. (2016). [Vladivostok Students’ Value System]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 8/9 (204), pp. 22-29. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

4. Popova, O.I. (2012). [Teacher of Higher Education Institution: A Modern View on Profession. Experience of Sociological Research]. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii = Pedagogical Education in Russia. No. 6, pp. 112-119. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

5. Senashenko, V.S. (2017). [On the Prestige of the University Teacher Profession, Postgraduate Academic Degrees and Titles]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 2, pp. 36-44. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

6. Dul’zon, A.A., Vasil’eva, O.N. (2014). [Competence (Self)Assessment Interactive System of Tomsk Polytechnic University Academic Staff]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 5, pp. 61-70. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

7. Puchkov, A.A. (2012). [An Ideal Image of a Teacher as a Factor of Management of Teaching Process at the University]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 6, pp. 130-133. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

8. Gaidukova, G.N. (2012). [Sociological Monitoring of Customer Satisfaction with the Quality of the Educational Services]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 11, pp. 105-111. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

9. Zelenev, I.A., Tumanov, S.V. (2012). [Teaching Quality Assessment in Higher Education Institution within the Context of Students’ Perceptions of Teachers (Sociological Study Experience)]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 4, pp. 99-105. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

10. Merkulova, O.P. (2012). [Evaluation of Educational Process by Students]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 2, pp. 18-24. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

11. Dmitrieva, T.V., Shepeleva, R.P. (2014). [Rating of the Quality of Didactic Activities of University Teachers]. Vysshee obrazovanie segodnya = Higher Education Today. No. 9, pp. 50-54. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

12. Shestak, V.P. (2016). [Higher School Teaching Environment (About the «Patterns»)]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 5, pp. 72-79. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

13. Yakimova, Z.V., Masilova, M.G. (2017). [Z Generation as a Potential Segment of the Labor Market]. Azimut nauchnykh issledovanii: pedagogika i psikhologiya = Azimuth of Scientific Research: Pedagogy and Psychology. Vol. 6, No. 4 (21), pp. 341-346. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

14. Howe, N., Strauss, W. (1991). Generations: The History of America’s Future 1584-2069. New York: William Morrow and Company.

15. Howe, N., Strauss, W. (2008). Millennials & K-12 Schools: Educational Strategies for a New Generation. Great Falls, VA: LifeCourse Associates, pp. 109-111.