Professional Development Model for ESP Teachers Working at Engineering Universities
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-1-147-158
Abstract
The article describes application of pedagogical modelling in designing professional development (PD) syllabus for Language for Specific Purposes (LSP) teachers working at Russian engineering universities. The authors consider meaningful factors defining professional requirements for LSP tertiary teachers and view the problems of LSP teachers’ professional development from engineering pedagogy perspective. They substantiate the necessity of developing the Profile of LSP tertiary teachers’ professional competencies as a standard description of qualification requirements for this specialty. The authors analyze the results of LSP teachers’ diagnostics that revealed methodo-logical deficit of the respondents in theory and practice of cross-disciplinary approach to teaching Language for Specific (Engineering) Purposes. The organizational and pedagogical model based on qualification requirements of the above Profile is proposed as the basis of professional development syllabus design, selection of teaching methods and assessment of learning outcomes. The addressees of the above model are tertiary LSP teachers willing to improve their professional competences and cross-disciplinary integrative skills in order to develop foreign language professional communicative competence of engineering students.
About the Authors
K. M. InozemtsevaRussian Federation
Kira M . Inozemtseva – Cand. Sci. (Education), Assoc. Prof.
Address: 5, 2nd Baymanskaya str., Moscow, 105005, Russian Federation
N. O. Troufanova
Russian Federation
Natalia O . Troufanova – Cand. Sci. (Philology), Assoc. Prof., Head of English for Industrial Engineering Department
Address: 5, 2nd Baymanskaya str., Moscow, 105005, Russian Federation
A. K. Krupchenko
Russian Federation
Anna K . Krupchenko – Dr. Sci. (Education), Prof.
Address: 88, Prosp. Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation
References
1. Vsemirnaya initsiativa CDIO: Planiruyemye resul’taty obucheniya (CDIO Syllabus) [Worldwide CDIO Initiative: Expected Learning Outcomes (CDIO Syllabus)]. (2011). Transl. and ed. by A.I. Chuchalin and T.S. Petrovskaya. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325986925_Vsemirnaa_iniciativa_CDIO_CDIO_Syllabus_-_Planiruemye_rezultaty_obucenia_versia_20_informacionno-metodiceskoe_izdanie (In Russ.)
2. Pokholkov, Yu.P. (2014). [Quality of Engineers’ Education in the Eyes of Academic Community]. Inzhenernoye obrazovaniye = Engineering Education. No. 15, pp. 18-24. Available at: http://aeer.ru/files/io/m15/art_1.pdf (In Russ.)
3. Inozemtseva, K.M. (2017). [Profile of Professional and Methodological Competence for a Foreign Language Teacher at an Engineering University]. Sovremennyie problemy nauki i obrazovaniia = Modern Problems of Science and Education. No. 3. Available at: http://www.scienceeducation.ru/article/view?id=26482 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
4. Inozemtseva, K.M. (2017). [Analysis of Modern Requirements for the Level of Foreign Language Proficiency of Engineering Specialists]. Obrazovaniie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. Vol. 19. No. 6, pp. 71-90. Available at: https://www.edscience.ru/jour/article/view/822/663 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
5. Prikhodko, V.M., Sazonova, Z.S. (2014). [Engineering Pedagogy as the Basis of Engineers and Faculty Training]. Vysshee obrazovaniie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 4, pp. 5-11. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
6. Auer, M., Dobrovska, D., Edwards, A., Lickl, E. (2013). [New Pedagogic Challenges in Engineering Education and the Answer of IGIP]. Vysshee obrazovaniie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 2, pp. 39-45. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
7. Ivanov, V.G., Sazonova, Z.S., Sapunov, M.B. (2017). [Engineering Pedagogy: An Attempt of Typology]. Vysshee obrazovaniie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 8/9, pp. 32-42. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
8. Krasnoshchokova, G.A. (2015). [Development of Engineering Students’ Foreign Language Professional Competence]. Izvestiya Yuzhnogo Federal’nogo Universiteta. Pedagogicheskiye nauki = Proceedings of South Ural University. Pedagogical Sciences. No. 11, pp. 99-102. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
9. Anzina, T.I. (2012). [Development of Mental and Ethical Components of a Manager Corporate Competence on the Basis of Synergetic Principles]. Vestnik Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo torgovo-economicheskogo universiteta (RGTEU) = Vestnik of the Russian State University of Trade and Economy. No. 9 (68), pp. 120-125. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
10. Inozemtseva, K., Troufanova, N. (2018). ESP Tertiary Teachers’ Perceptions of How They Comply with Requirements of Cross-disciplinary Education. EDULEARN18 Proceedings, pp. 6427-6434.
11. Factorovich, A.A., Yakubovskaya, O.Yu. (2016). [Competition of Professional Mastery for Tertiary Teachers: Experience and Prospects]. Problemy sovremennogo obrazovaniya = Problems of Modern Education. No. 1, pp. 13-20. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
12. Korotkina, I.B. (2017). [On “Road Maps”, the ‘Ranking Rush” and Academic Writing]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 1 (208), pp. 15-24. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
13. Crawley, E.F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D.R., Edström, K. (2014) Rethinking Engineering Education. CDIO Approach. 2nd ed. New York: Springer (Russian Translation: Moscow: VSE Publ., 2015, 502 p.)
14. Chuchalin, A.I., Tayurskaya, M.S., Myagkov, M.G. (2014). [Advanced Training for Management and Faculty Staff of Russian Universities in CDIO Standards Implementation]. Vysshee obrazovaniye v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 6, pp. 58-67. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
15. Polyakova, T.Yu. (2010). Diversifikatsiya nepreryvnoy professional’noy podgotovki po inostrannomu yazyky v injenernom obrazovanii [Diversification of Continuous Foreign Language Professional Training in Engineering Education]. Moscow: MADI Publ., 384 p. (In Russ.)
16. Krupchenko, A.K., Inozemtseva, K.M. (2014). [Methodology of Cross-Disciplinary Foreign Language Education of a Specialist]. In: Yazykovoye obrazovaniye segodnya – vectory razvitiya [Proc. of USPU Sci. and Method. Conf. “Foreign Language Teaching Today – Vectors of Development”], pp. 102-116. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_30639344_84335915.pdf (In Russ.)
17. Krupchenko, A.K. (2018). [Scientific School “Professional Linguodidactics”: International Context]. Pedagogicheskaya nauka i praktika [Pedagogic Science and Practice]. No. 1, pp. 7-11. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
18. Inozemtseva, K.M., Krupchenko, A.K. (2017). Metodologiya mezhdisciplinarnogo professional’nogo inoyazychnogo obrazovaniya (tekhnicheskiy vuz) [Methodology of CrossDisciplinary Professional Foreign Language Education (Engineering University): Professional Development Syllabus]. Moscow: BMSTU Publ., 70 p. (In Russ.)
19. Inozemtseva, K.M., Krupchenko, A.K. (2017). [Design of ESP Tertiary Teachers’ Professional Development Syllabus]. Pedagogicheskoye obrazovaniye i nauka = Pedagogical Education and Science. No. 3, pp. 46-49. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_30161731_72433602.pdf (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
20. Prilipko, E.V. (2015). [Assessment of Learning Outcomes in Competence-Based Educational Paradigm]. Sovremennoye dopolnitel’noye professional’noye pedagogocheskoye obrazovaniye = Modern Additional Pedagogical Education. Vol. 1, No. 4 (4), pp. 91-97. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)