Faculty Training for Online Teaching: Roles, Competences, Contents
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-2-51-62
Abstract
An important trend in higher education is an increasing use of digital technologies and an expansion of online-learning formats, which poses new challenges for university faculty to master the pedagogical competences in teaching online.
Universities are forced to expand their educational activities in the online environment, and to involve an increasing number of teachers in the design and delivery of online courses. However, faculty members often do not have the necessary skills and competencies, and their experience in the use of digital technology is insufficient. Meanwhile, the success of online teaching depends not only on advanced methods and technologies, but first of all on the quality of faculty involved. An important issue is how teachers are trained to perform these tasks. To ensure the effectiveness of online education, the Institute of Further Professional Education of the Kazan National Research Technological University is developing approaches to training faculty for the transition to virtual learning environment. They should take into account factors, incentives and barriers affecting faculty’s participation in online teaching, and analyze changes in the activities of teaching stuff in the online environment.
The paper dwells on the foreign experience in training faculty for online teaching. We analyzed publications considering new roles and competencies of online teachers, barriers and motivations that encourage faculty to participate in online learning. The paper gives an overview of the content of foreign training courses aimed at the formation of a complex of subject, pedagogical and technological competences of faculty related to online teaching. The main goal of the analysis was to determine the core competencies of online teachers, so that to reflect them in the program of training faculty for teaching online.
About the Authors
Mansur F. GalikhanovRussian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Engineering), Prof., Director of the Institute of Further Professional Development
Gulnara F. Khasanova
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Education), Prof., Department of engineering education and psychology
References
1. Хасанова Г.Ф., Зарипов Р.Н. Педагогический потенциал открытых образовательных ресурсов // Казанский педагогический журнал. 2018. №4. С. 68-72 [Khasanova, G.F., Zaripov, R.N. (2018). Open Educational Resources: Pedagogical Potential. Kazanskii pedagogicheskii zhurnal = Kazan Pedagogical Journal. No. 4, pp. 68-72. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)]
2. Хасанова Г.Ф. Технологические инновации в инженерном образовании в контексте социально-гуманитарного знания // Казанская наука. 2017. №6. С. 92-94 [Khasanova, G.F. (2017). Technological Innovations in Engineering Education in Socio-Humanitarian Context. Kazanskaya nauka = Kazan Science]. No. 6, pp. 92-94. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
3. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to education. United Nations General Assembly. 6 April 2016. A/HRC/32/37 Available at: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/ G16/070/33/PDF/ G1607033.pdf?OpenElement
4. Betts, K. (2014). Factors Influencing Faculty Participation & Retention in Online & Blended Education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration. Vol. 17. No. 1.
5. Parker, A. (2003). Motivation and Incentives for Distance Faculty. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration. No. 6. Available at: http://www.westga.edu/∼distance/ojdla/fall63/ parker63.htm
6. Panda, S., Mishra, S. (2007). E-Learning in a Mega Open University: Faculty Attitude, Barriers and Motivators. Educational Media International, Vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 323-338.
7. Ammenwerth, E. (2017). Envisioning Changing Role of University Teacher in Online Instructional Environments. AISHE-J: The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Vol. 9. No 3.
8. Maguire, L.L. (2005). Literature Review – Faculty Participation in Online Distance Education: Barriers and Motivators. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration. Vol. VIII, No. I.
9. Neely, P.W., Tucker, J.P. (2010). Unbundling Faculty Roles in Online Distance Education Programs. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. No. 11, pp. 20-32.
10. Coppola, N.W., Hiltz, S.R., Rotter, N. (2001). Becoming a Virtual Professor: Pedagogical Roles and ALN. Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Science.
11. Chang, C., Shen, H.-Y., Liu, E. Z.-F. (2014). University Faculty’s Perspectives on the Roles of E-instructors and their Online Instruction Practice. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. No. 15, pp. 72-92.
12. Bawane, J., Spector, J. M. (2009). Prioritization of Online Instructor Roles: Implications for Competency-Based Teacher Education Programs. Distance Educatio. No. 30, p. 383.
13. Smith, T.C. (2005). Fifty-One Competencies for Online Instruction. The Journal of Educators Online. No. 2(2).
14. Niess, M., Gillow-Wiles, H. (2013). Developing Asynchronous Online Courses: Key Instructional Strategies in a Social Metacognitive Constructivist Learning Trajectory. Journal of Distance Education. No. 27. Available at: http://www.jofde.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/831/1473
15. Clinefelter, D. (2012). Best Practices in Online Faculty Development. In: Learning House Whitepaper. Available at: https://www.learninghouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Best-Practices-for-Online-Faculty-Development_Web_Final.pdf
16. Yang Y., Cornelious L. (2005). Preparing Instructors for Quality Online Instruction. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration. Vol. VIII. No. 1.
17. Volk, B., Keller, S.A. (2010). The “Zurich E-Learning Certificate”: A Role Model for the Acquirement of e-Competence for Academic Staff and an Example of a Practical Implementation. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. No. 1. Available at: http://www.eurodl. org/materials/contrib/2010/ Volk_Keller.pdf
18. Rienties, B., Brouwer, N., Lygo-Baker, S. (2013). The Effects of Online Professional Development on Higher Education Teachers’ Beliefs and Intentions Towards Learning Facilitation and Technology. Teaching and Teacher Education. No. 29, pp. 122-131.
19. Baran, E., Correia, A., Thompson, A. (2011). Transforming Online Teaching Practice: Critical Analysis of the Literature on the Roles and Competencies of Online Teachers. Distance Education. No. 32(3), pp. 421-439.
20. TAP Certificate in e-Learning Design. The Training Foundation. Available at: https://www.taptraining.com/course-search/tap-certificate-in-elearning-design-classroom-blend/
21. Мифтахутдинова Л.Т. Об опыте использования дистанционных образовательных технологий и электронных ресурсов при реализации дополнительных профессиональных программ в технологическом университете // Инженерное образование. 2018. №23. С. 64-70 [Miftakhutdinova, L.T. (2018). On the Experience of the Use of Distant Education Technologies and e-Resources in Further Professional Education Programs in Technological University. Inzhenernoe obrazovanie = Engineering Education]. No. 23, pp. 64-70. (In Russ.)