Preview

Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia

Advanced search

City-campus, or Educational Space of the City. Methodological Construct

https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-4-44-59

Abstract

The article considers the city from the point of view of its educational potential and in the categories of educational space, approaching the main cultural and historical forms of the city as educational institutions. With this review, at least three focus points are retained: 1) Consideration of the city space and its infrastructure as an educational space and educational infrastructure that are not reducible to usual school and university (the latter should also be culturally and historically distributed, showing their basic etymons and missions); 2) Consideration of education as an institution of educational and, more broadly, anthropological practices of the development and formation of a person, and not as a disciplinary institution and matrix; 3) Consideration of the repertoire of anthropological practices development as a practice unfolding in urban space. It is shown that these three foci act as mirrors directed at each other, mirroring and showing each other mutual potential and mutual scarcity, the need for each other. The actual wealth (thesaurus) of the urban space depends on the density, frequency and variety of connections between these areas. Next, we look at specific cultural and historical forms, such as the Temple, School, Museum, University, etc., which constitute the basic infrastructure nodes of the city space itself. These cultural institutions are considered not so much from the point of view of their internal tasks, but from the position of their place in the city, in the urban space, with regard to their place and role as special educational nodes-institutions in this space. Further, the urban space is considered in the categories of the campus city, in which this space is linked by different anthropological practices repertoires.

About the Author

S. A. Smirnov
Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Science
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Leading Researcher


References

1. Glazychev, V.L. (2008). Urbanistika [Urbanism]. Moscow: Evropa Publ., 220 p. (In Russ.)

2. Smirnov, S.A. (2019). [Human Dimension of the City]. Praksema. Problemy vizual’noy semiotiki = ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Problems of Visual Semiotics. No. 3. (In Russ.)

3. Toporov, V.N. (1987). [The Text of the City-Maiden and the Harlot City in the Mythological Aspect]. In: Issledovaniya po structure teksta [Studies on Text Structure]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., pp. 121-132. (In Russ.)

4. Gutnov, A.E. (1984). Evolutsiya gradostroitel’stva [The Evolution of Urban Planning]. Moscow: Stroyizdat Publ., 256 p. (In Russ.)

5. Smirnov, S.A. (2017). [Image of the City: From Map to Mental Map]. Praksema. Problemy vizual’noy semiotiki = ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Problems of Visual Semiotics. No. 4 (14), pp. 28-48. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

6. Smirnov, S.A. (2018). [Anthropoid Mental Map as a Means of Anthropological Navigation]. Praksema. Problemy vizualjnoy semiotiki = ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Problems of Visual Semiotics. No. 1 (15), pp. 34-48. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

7. Shukurov, Sh.M. (2002). Obraz Khrama [The Image of Temple]. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 496 p. (In Russ.)

8. Shukurov, Sh.M. (Ed) (1997). Sovershennyi chelovek. Teologiya i filosofiya obraza [The Perfect Man. Theology and Philosophy of Image]. Moscow: Valent Publ., 448 p. (In Russ.)

9. Gippodamov Gorod (2004). [Hippodamov City]. Arkhitektura. Kratkiy Slovar [Architecture. Brief guide]. Comp. M. Adamchik. Minsk: Harvest Publ., p. 144. (In Russ.)

10. Porshnev, V.P. (2012). Mussei v kulturnom nasledii antichnosti [Museum in the Cultural Heritage of Antiquity]. Moscow: New Acropolis Publ., 336 p. (In Russ.)

11. Gasparov, M.L. (1995). Zanimatel’naya Gretsiya [Entertaining greece. Stories of Ancient greek Culture]. Moscow: greek-Latin Cabinet Yu.A. Shichalina Publ., NLO Publ., 382 p. (In Russ.)

12. Hudson, K. (1987). Museums of Influence (Russian Translation: Novosibirsk: Siberian Chronograph Publ., 2001, 166 p.)

13. Marrou, H.I. (1956). History of Education in Antiquity (Greece). London: Sheed & Ward. (Russian Translation: Moscow: greek-Latin Cabinet Yu.A. Shichalin Publ., 1998, 425 p.)

14. Stepanov, Yu.S., Proskurin, S.g. (1993). Konstanty v mirovoy culture. Alfavity i alfavitnye teksty v periody dvoeveriya [Constants in World Culture. Alphabets and Alphabetic Texts in Periods of Dual Faith]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 158 p. (In Russ.)

15. Lobok, A.M. (2012). [School of a New generation: Philosophy, Benchmarks, Priorities]. Shkolnye tekhnologii = School Technologies. No. 6, pp. 28-40. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

16. Schelsky, H. (2013). [Solitude and Freedom. To the Social Idea of the german University].Transl. from german. Logos. No. 1 (91), pp. 65-86. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

17. Readings, B. (1996). The University in Ruins. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts and London.

18. Mittelstrass, J. (2013). [The Future of Science and the Presence of University]. Transl. from german. Logos. No. 1 (91), pp. 100-121. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

19. Koyava, L.V., Novgorodov, P.A., Smirnov, S.A. (2018). [Entrepreneurial University. Concept]. Sovremennaya Konkurentsiya = Journal of Modern Competition. Vol. 12. No. 4-5, pp. 93-105. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

20. Clark, B.R. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Emerald group Publishing.

21. Etzkovitz, H. (2008). The Triple Helix. University – Industry – government. Innovation in Action. Routledge. NY-London.

22. Predposylki vozniknovenya universitetskoi sredy v zentral’noy chasti raspredelennogo kampusa NIU VShE [Background of the University Environment Emergence in the Central Part of the HSE Distributed Campus]. Available at: https://vuzlit.ru/338379/predposylki_vozniknoveniya_universitetskoy_sredy_v_rayone_tsentralnoy_chasti_raspredelennogo_kampusa_niu_ vshe (In Russ.)

23. Puchkov, M.V. (2011). [University Campus. Principles of Architectural and Urban Design for Modern University Complexes]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturnostroitel’nogo universiteta = Journal of Construction and Architecture. No. 3, pp. 79-88. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

24. Campus and the City – Urban Design for the Knowledge Society (2007). K. Hoeger and K. Christiaanse (Eds). Verlag.

25. Glazychev, V.L. (2011). Gorod bez granitz [City Without Borders]. Moscow: Territoriya budushchego Publ., 398 p. (In Russ.)

26. Voronov, Yu.P., Zausayev, S.A., Smirnov, S.A. (2009). [Agglomerations and Urbanized Clusters: To New Objects of Design and Management]. Vestnik NSUEM. No. 1, pp. 101-115 (In Russ.)

27. Martynov, K.K. (2013). [Distance Coursera]. Otechestvennye Zapiski [Domestic Notes]. No. 4 (55), pp. 307-316. (In Russ.)

28. Vysokovskiy, A.A. (2015). [City and University]. In: A.A. Vysokovskiy. Sochineniya: v 3 t. [Writings in 3 vol.]Vol. 3. Public. Moscow: gray Matter Publ., pp. 63-118. (In Russ.)

29. Raspredelennyi campus VShE v Moskve [Distributed Campus of HSE in Moscow]. Available at: https://www.hse.ru/buildinghse/rcampus (accessed 20.02.2019) (In Russ.)


Review

Views: 867


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0869-3617 (Print)
ISSN 2072-0459 (Online)