The CDIO ++ Approach to University Faculty Advance Training for Research and Teaching Activities
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-5-18-36
Abstract
A review of the literature on university faculty advanced training for research and teaching activities is presented. Based on the analysis of the experience of Russian and foreign universities, the principles for developing a modern faculty advanced training system at the university are set out responding to the challenges associated with the ongoing and expected changes in the content and technology of student training, primarily in the field of STEM. It is proposed to use the CDIO ++ approach for advanced training of faculty of various categories (professor, associate professor, assistant) to research and teaching activities in the conditions of division of labor when creating and implementing educational products at various stages of their life cycle. The distribution of academic staff potential is shown and an assessment of the resources of a program for faculty advanced training is given on the basis of the CDIO ++ approach for a hypothetical university with a given structure and established priorities for faculty members of various categories.
About the Author
A. I. Chuchalin
Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk;
Kuban State Technological University, Krasnodar
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Engineering), Prof.
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Engineering), Prof.
References
1. Crawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund, S., Brodeur, D., Edström, K. Rethinking Engineering Education, the CDIO Approach, Second Edition. Springer, 2014. [Russian translation: Moscow: Publ. House of Higher School of Economics. Transl. by S. Rybushkina, ed. by A. Chuchalin, 2015, 504 p.]
2. Verbitsky, A.A. (2014). Teacher as a Main Subject of the Education Reform. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 4, pp. 13-20. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
3. Chuchalin, A.I. (2016). Application of the CDIO Approach to Three Level Engineering Programs Design. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 4, pp. 17-32. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
4. Chuchalin, A. Evolution of the CDIO Approach: BEng, MSc and PhD Level. European Journal of Engineering Education. Published online: 04 Jan 2018. DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2017.1422694
5. Krasinskaya, L.F. (2011). Modeling the Process of Raising Teachers’s Skills Level on the Basis of Competence Approach. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 7, pp. 75-80. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
6. Khodenkova O.P. (2011). Model of Key Competencies of a University Instructor, Formed under the Influence of Postgraduate Education. Vestnik AGTU. Ser. «Ehkonomika» = Vestnik of Astrakhan State Technical University. Series: Economics. No. 2. (In Russ.)
7. Shageeva, F.T. (2017). Engineering Teacher’s Pedagogical Mastery: Ways to Improve. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 10, pp. 88-93. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
8. Pozdeeva, S.I. (2017). Engineering Teacher’s Pedagogical Mastery: Ways to Improve. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 3, pp. 52-58. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
9. Polupan, K.L. (2017). Reconstruction of Pedagogical Activities in Higher Education. Vyssheeobrazovanie v Rossii=Higher Education in Russia. No. 2. Pp. 45-51. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
10. Milyaeva, L.M. (2013). [University Faculty Training for Innovative Activities in a Self-Learning Organization]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya = Modern Problems of Science and Education. No. 5. (In Russ.)
11. Kozlova, E.V. (2013). The Concept of Advanced Training of University Research and Teaching Staff Based on the Ideas of Corporate Education and the Network Approach. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya = Modern Problems of Science and Education. No. 6. (In Russ.)
12. The IGIP Working Group “Teaching Best Practices”. URL: http://www.igip.org/IGIP_working-groups_Teaching-Best-Practices.php
13. Prikhodko, V.M. (2013). Features of the Preparation of a Modern Teacher of Engineering University (Following the Results of the 42nd International Symposium IGIP). Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 12, pp. 45-50. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
14. Chuchalin, A.I., Minin, M.G., Safyannikov, I.A. (2008). Actual Issues ofTraining Teaching Staff at Technical Universities. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 5, pp. 37-42. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
15. Minin, M.G., Belomestnova, E.N., Benson, G.F., Voyakina, E.Yu. (2014). Lectures’ Pedagogic Training at Engineering University. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 4, pp. 20-29. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
16. Starodubtsev, V.A., Kiseleva, A.A. (2014). Network Technology of Advanced Training Course. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 1, pp. 98-103. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
17. Zavada, G.V. (2017). Updating and Development of a University Instructor’s Competencies in the Process of His Training. In: Proceedings of the International Conference “Innovations in the Field of Pedagogy and Psychology”. No. 2. Moscow, 88 p. (In Russ.)
18. Kim, I.N. (2014). Professional Activities of the Universities Teaching Staff: Set Patterns and Need for Changes. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 4, pp. 39-47. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
19. Chuchalin, A.I. (2017). Preparation of PhD Students for Pedagogical Activity in Higher Education. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 8-9, pp. 5-21. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
20. Bolotin, I.S., Dorofeev, A.A., Sorokina, N.D. (2015). On Teacher’s Competences and the Teacher’s Skills Raising System. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 2, pp. 151-155. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
21. Jacob, W.J. et al. (2015). Professional Development Programmes at World-Class Universities. Palgrave Communications, 1 : 15002, doi: 10.1057/palcomms.20152. Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/palcomms20152
22. Kelsky, K. (2018). The Professor Is in: Research First or Teaching? The Chronicle of Higher Education. January 29. Available at: https://www.chronicle.com/article/The-Professor-Is-In-Research/242371
23. Hanc, J. (2016). Teaching Professors to Become Better Teachers. The New York Times. June 22. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/23/education/teaching-professors-to-become-better-teachers.html.
24. Luciana Leandro da Silva. (2017). Policies for Training University Professors in Sao Paulo, Brazil and Catalonia, Spain: Trends and Challenges. Educ. Pesqui. Vol. 43, no. 1. Sгo Paulo Jan./Mar. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1517-9702201701158662
25. Robinson, T.E., Hope, W.C. (2013). Teaching in Higher Education: Is There a Need for Training in Pedagogy in Graduate Degree Programs? Research in Higher Education Journal. Vol. 21, Aug. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1064657
26. Auten, J.G., Twigg, M.M. (2015). Teaching and Learning SoTL: Preparing Future Faculty in a Pedagogy Course. Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal. Vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 3-13. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/teachlearningu.3.1.3?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
27. Phelps, P.H. (2018). Five Fundamentals of Faculty Development. July 17. Available at: https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/faculty-development/five-fundamentals-faculty-development
28. Haras, C. (2018). Faculty Development as an Authentic Professional Practice. January 17. Available at: https://www.higheredtoday.org/2018/01/17/faculty-development-authentic-professional-practice/
29. Chuchalin, A.I., Tayurskaya, M.S., Myagkov, M.G. (2014). Advanced Training for Management and Faculty Staff of Russian Universities in CDIO Standards Implementation. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 6, pp. 58-67. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
30. Chuchalin, A., Tayurskaya, M., Malmqvist, J. (2015). Professional Development of Russian HEIs’ Management and Faculty in CDIO Standards Application. European Journal of Engineering Education. Vol. 40, issue 6, pp. 1-12.
31. Chuchalin, A.I. (2018). Modernization of Three-Cycle Higher Education Based on FSES 3++ and CDIO. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 4, pp. 22-32. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
32. Chuchalin, A. (2018). Three-Cycle Engineering Education based on the CDIO–FCDI–FFCD Triad. In: Proceedings of the 46th SEFI Annual Conference, 17–21 September, Copenhagen, Technical University of Denmark, pp. 682-690.
33. Chuchalin, A., Barkhatova T., Kalmanovich, S. (2018). Development and Implementation of the CDIO Approach at Kuban State Technological University. Proceedings of the 14th International CDIO Conference, June 28 – July 2, 2018, Kanazava Institute of Technology, Kanazava, Japan, pp. 807-819.
34. Chuchalin, A.I. (2018). Engineering Education in the Epoch of Industrial Revolution and Digital Economy. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 10, pp. 47-62. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
Review
Views:
612
Email this article 