Market Mechanisms as a Social Deadlock for Russian Education
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-5-63-72
Abstract
InRussia, the preference of the educational policy for market paths has been being formed for nearly thirty years. The mechanisms, consequences and prospects of so called marketization have not been yet studied. The article considers the marketization of education, including higher education, as a scientific and social problem. Basing on foreign and domestic sources, the author proves that the marketization of education is generated by neo-liberal attitude of the financial and economic elites seeking to reduce state budget expenditures in the social sphere and keep up the disintegration of society and to secure their future domination. The state, the bureaucratic apparatus of the education system, educators’ and researchers’ communities do not take up the problem of education marketization and its consequences. The marketization strategy along with its derivatives is taken in society as an axiom, without special studies and research. Due to this education is being dysfunctional, it experiences a protracted institutional crisis, social tensions and losses, whilst the search of ways out of the neoliberal deadlock is postponed up to uncertain future.
Supporting agencies: The study was supported by the grant of the Russian Science Foundation (agreement 18-18-00047).
About the Author
A. M. Osipov
Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia, St. Petersburg
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Sociology), Prof.
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Sociology), Prof.
References
1. Osipov, A.M. (2017). [“Trojan Horses” of Neoliberalism in Education]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia. = Sociological Studies. No. 8, pp. 136-146. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
2. Osipov, A. M., Boyadzhieva, P. A. (2018). Informatsiya v upravlenii obrazovaniem: teoreticheskie problemy [Information in Education Management: Theoretical Problems]. Veliky Novgorod: NovSU Publ., 175 p. (In Russ.)
3. Jessop, B. (2002). The Future of Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity Press. 344 p.
4. Osipov, A.M. (Ed) (2015). Globalnaya sotsiologia obrazovania [Global Sociology of Education]. Veliky Novgorod: NovSU Publ., 175 p. (In Russ.)
5. Osipov, A., Ivanova, V., Dobrenkov, V. (Eds). (2013). Global Sociology of Education: General Perspectives. Veliky Novgorod: NovSU Publ.
6. Bunar, N. (2010). Choosing for Quality or Inequality. Journal of Education Policy. Vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1-18.
7. Lauder, H., Hughes, D. (Eds.). Trading in Futures: Why Markets in Education Don’t Work. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1999. 204 p.
8. Thrupp, M. (2005). School Quasi-Markets: Best Understood as a Class Strategy? Waikato Journal of Education. 2005. Vol. 11, no. 2. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15663/wje.v11i2.314
9. Waslander, S., Pater, C., van der Weide, M. (2010). Markets in Education. OECD Education Working Paper. No. 52. Paris: OECD Publishing.
10. Levin,B. (1998). An Epidemic of Education Policy: (What) Can We Learn From Each Other?Comparative Education. Vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 131–141. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03050069828234
11. Ilyinsky, I.M. (2002). Obrazovatelnaya revolutsiya [Educational Revolution]. Moscow: Moscow Social State Acad. Publ., 592 p. (In Russ.)
12. Sadovnichy, V.A. (Ed.) (2002). Obrazovanie, kotoroe my mozhem poteryat’ [Education That We May Loose: Collection of Articles]. Moscow: Moscow State University Publ., 368 p. (In Russ.)
13. Zborovskiy, G.E. (2011). [Lessons from a Failed Modernization of Education]. In: Sotsialnaya strategiya rossi’skoy sistemy obrazovania [Social Strategy of the Russian System of Education]. St. Petersburg: Herzen Univ. Publ., pp. 39-44. (In Russ.)
14. Osipov, A.M. (Ed). (2018). Sotsiologiya obrazovaniya: uchebnik i praktikum [Sociology of Education: Textbook and Practicum for Bachelor’s and Master’s Students]. Moscow: URAIT Publ., 367 p. (In Russ.)
15. Asmolov, A.G. (2001). [Psychology of the XXI Century and the Birth of Variable Education Environment of Russia]. In: Novoe vremya – novaya didaktika [New Epoch – New Didactics]. Moscow, Samara: Korporatsia Fedorov Publ., pp. 5-24. (In Russ.)
16. Amsler, S., Bolsmann, Ch. (2012). University Ranking as Social Exclusion. British Journal of Sociology of Education. Vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 283-301. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2011.649835
17. Giroux, H.A. (2004). Terror of Neoliberalism. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers. 224 p.
18. Osipov, A.M., Ivanova, V.A. (2016). [Institutional Functions – A Threshold Problem of Contemporary Sociology of Education]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia = Sociological Studies. No. 1, pp. 117-124. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
Review
Views:
658
Email this article 