About Subjectivity of a University Student in Educational Activity
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-5-145-154
Abstract
The subjectivity of a university student in educational activities is considered as a significant factor of the compliance between the existing state of the university educational system and the requirements placed on it. The article focuses on the imbalance of information support of educational activities, the lack of personal characteristics of students in this provision. First of all, this refers to the indicators of students’ development processes, their value systems, and the choice of activity strategies. A review of the results of empirical studies that characterize students in the current educational situation is carried out. As part of a study aimed at identifying students’ individual academic strategies, a technique has been proposed to define the value-semantic determination of student activity. This method enables determining the student’s value preferences in the space of possible components of his activity. The student performs pair comparisons of the various components of his activity and in each pair chooses the component that is more important for him. According to the results of comparisons, a hierarchy for each student is determined which reflects his value preferences in the space of possible activity. The analysis of such hierarchies indicates that only 27,6% of students characterize the dominance of the processes of formation of their subjectivity. At the same time, 52,6% of students show incomplete personal subjectivity. And 19,8% of students in their activities are guided by the existing situation and external stimulation. The analysis of the general hierarchy reflecting the value preferences of the considered sample of students in the space of possible activities was performed.
Keywords
university student,
student’s subjectivity,
student activity strategies,
value preferences,
hierarchy of value preferences
Supporting agencies: The study was supported by the Government task 27.5905.2017/8.9 “System and cognitive approach to identification of individual academic strategies of students based on the dynamics of their academic achievements and the characteristics of burnout” (2017–2019).
About the Author
B. E. Fishman
Sholom-Aleichem Priamursky State University, Birobidzhan
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Education), Prof.
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Education), Prof.
References
1. Mukhametzyanova, F.G., Zabirov, R.V. (2015). [Designing of Individual Educational Trajectories and Routes of University Students – the Future Bachelors]. Kazanskiy pedagogicheskii zhurnal = Kazan Pedagogical Journal. No. 4 (111). Part 1, pp. 130-133. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
2. Mukhametzyanova, F.G., Miftakhov, I.I. (2013). [The Phenomenon of Student Subjectivity in Psychology] Kazanskiy pedagogicheskiy zhurnal = Kazan Pedagogical Journal. No. 4, pp. 126-130. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
3. Papikyan, T. A., Obmoina, A.V. (2017). [The State of the Education System in Modern Russia and Its Relevance]. In: Education: Past, Present and Future: Materials of the III Intern. Scientific Conf. (Krasnodar, August 2017). Krasnodar: Novation Publ., pp. 13-16. Available at: https://moluch.ru/conf/ped/archive/269/12813/ (In Russ.)
4. Shkhakhutova, Z.Z. (2012). [The Current State of Education]. Nauchno-metodicheskiy elektronnyi zhurnal “Koncept” [Scientific and methodical electronic journal “Concept”]. No. 9. Available at: https://e-koncept.ru/2012/12119.htm (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
5. Andreev, A.L. (2018). [Sociology as a Tool of “Pedagogical Intelligence”]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 27. No. 5, pp.121-129. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
6. Kaldybaev, S.K., Beyshenaliev, A.B. (2015). [The Quality of Educational Process in the Structure of the Quality of Education] Uspekhi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya [Successes of Modern Natural Sciences]. No. 7, pp. 90-97. Available at: http://natural-sciences.ru/ru/article/view?id=35495 (In Russ.)
7. Kuzminchuk, A.A. (2016). [Institutional Conditions for the Formation of Non-linear Educational Strategies of Students]. Vestnik PNIPU. Socialno-ehkonomicheskie nauki = PNRPU Sociology and Economics Bulletin. No. 4, pp. 50-67. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
8. Lesina, L.A. (2017). [Professional Strategies of Students of Pedagogical Universities in Conditions of Social Uncertainty]. Izvestiya uralskogo federalnogo universiteta. Ser. 1. Problemy obrazovaniya nauki I kultury = Izvestia Ural Federal University Journal. Series 1. Issues in Education, Science and Culture. Vol. 23. No. 2 (162), pp. 141-153. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
9. Gubina, N.K., Sharova, M.A., Zaitseva, T.V, Bova, E.Yu. (2017). [Life Strategies of Student Youth of a Regional University and the Quality of Its Educational and Social Capital]. Istoricheskie, filosofskie politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki kulturologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki = Historical, Philosophical, Political and Legal Sciences, Cultural Studies and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. No. 2, pp. 74-79. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
10. Petrov, D.V., Ivutina, E.P. (2016). [Types of Life Strategies of the Student’s Personality]. Nauchno-metodicheskiy elektronnyi zhurnal “Koncept” [Scientific and methodical electronic journal “Concept”]. Vol. 32, pp. 141-150. Available at: http://e-koncept.ru/2016/56678.htm (In Russ.)
11. Yulanova, N.D. (2015). [The Main Problems of Organizing Independent Work of Students]. Pedagogika vysshei shkoly [Higher School Pedagogy]. No.1, pp. 29-32. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
12. Leushin, I.O., Leushina, I.V. (2017). [Some Problems Student Individual Work Organization at Technical University]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 6 (213), pp. 51-56. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
13. Ilinsky, I.M. (2002). [The Twentieth Century: A Crisis of Understanding]. In: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii «Itogi KhKh veka», posvyashchyonnoy 80-letiyu A.A. Zinov’eva [“The Results of the twentieth century”: Proc. Int. Sci. Conf. dedicated to the 80th Anniversary of A.A. Zinoviev: Collection of papers, Moscow, 2002, November 15]. Available at: http://www.ilinskiy.ru/publications/sod/kris-pon-txt.php (In Russ.)
14. Sinyugina, T.V. (2008). [Life Self-Determination: An Attempt of Typology]. Nauchnaya mysl Kavkaza = Scientific Thought of the Caucasus. No. 1, pp. 131-135. (In Russ.)
15. Moskvina, N.B. (2016). [Semantic Conflict in the Activities of a University Teacher (the Experience of Empirical Research)]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 7 (203), pp. 95-102. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
16. Fishman, B.E., Kuzmina, B.S., Fokina, O.A., Bogachenko, N.G., Pavlova, O.V., Vashkyavichus, V.Y. Educational Expanse and Value Orientations of University Students’ Educational Activity. Available at: https://www.futureacademy.org.uk/publication/EpSBS/EEIA2018/
Review
Views:
753
Email this article 