About a New Model of Engineering Training
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-7-94-101
Abstract
The aim of the article is to present a model of training engineers based on new approaches to engineering education, taking into account the modern achievements of psychology. The authors believe that the main reason for the insufficient level of engineering training is the discrepancy between the essence of the knowledge transferred to students (both form and content) to the specifics of engineering activity. Therefore, the most important task is to eliminate this contradiction. The basis of the proposed model of engineering training is the design of the educational process in the logic of engineering process in the development of innovative technology. This learning technology called “Simulation-Activity Technology of Engineering Training” (SATET) has been developed and tested at the National Research Nuclear University MEPhI in training engineersdevelopers of innovative technology. The foundations laid in the proposed technology of engineering training, and the mechanisms for its implementation can be considered as a start for the development of a new paradigm of training engineers.
About the Authors
A. A. Sysoev
National Research Nuclear University MEPhI
Russian Federation
Alexander A. Sysoev – Dr. Sci. (Phys. and math.), Prof.
Russian Federation
Alexander A. Sysoev – Dr. Sci. (Phys. and math.), Prof.
E. B. Vesna
National Research Nuclear University MEPhI
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena B. Vesna – Dr. Sci. (Psychology), Prof., Vice-rector
Address: 31, Kashirskoye shosse, Moscow, 115409, Russian Federation
Yu. I. Aleksandrov
Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences;
Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yuriy I. Aleksandrov – Dr. Sci. (Psychology), Prof., Corresponding Member of Russian academy of education
Address: 13, Yaroslavskaya str., Moscow, 129366; 29, Sretenka str., Moscow, 127051, Russian Federation
References
1. Markvardt, K.G. (1981). Razvivaushchaya sistema podgotovki spetcialistov [Developing the System of Training of Specialists]. Moscow: Znanie Publ., 35 p. (In Russ.)
2. Verbitsky, A.A. (1991). Aktivnoe obuchenie v vysshey shkole: kontekstnyi podkhod: metod. posobie [Active Education in Higher School: Contextual Approach: Textbook]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola Publ., 207 p. (In Russ.)
3. Sysoev, A.A. (1995). The Imitation of Professional Activity in the Process of Student Training is the Future of University Education. International Conference on Engineering Education, May 23-25, Moscow: Abstracts, p. 17.
4. Sysoev, A.A., Vesna, E.B. (2016). Novel Approach to the Formation of the Engineering Skills of Students. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. December, Special Issue for INTE 2016, pp. 148-152.
5. Sysoev, A.A., Vesna E.B. (2014). Role of Psychological Factors in New Technology of Design Engineer Education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. No. 128, pp. 469-474.
6. Johnson, L., Adams, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V. (2012). Technology Outlook for STEM+ Education 2012–2017: An NMC Horizon Report Sector Analysis. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
7. Bybee, R.W. (2010). “What is STEM Education?” Science. Vol. 329, no. 5995, pp. 996-996. DOI: 10.1126 /science.1194998
8. Crawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund, S., Brodeur, D., Edström, K. (2014). Rethinking Engineering Education, the CDIO Approach. 2nd ed. Springer. 286 p. (Russian translation: Moscow: HSE Publ., 2014, 504 p.)
9. Vsemirnaya initsiativa CDIO. Standarty. Inforvatsionno-metodicheskoe izdanie. (2011). [World Initiative of CDIO. Standards. Informational and Methodical Publication.] Eds: Chuchalin, A.I., Petrovskaya, T.S., Kulyukina, E.S. Tomsk: Tomsk Polytechnic Univ. Publ., 17 p. (In Russ.)
10. Aleksandrov, Yu.А. (2012). [Psychophysiological Regularities of Learning and Methods of Teaching]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal = Psychological Journal. Vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 5-19. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
11. Simonov, P.V. (1981) Emotsionalnyi mozg. Fiziologiya. Neyroanatomiya. Psikhologiya emotciy [Emotional Brain. Physiology. Neuroanatomy. Psychology of Emotions]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 216 p. (In Russ.)
12. Comenius, J.A. (1955). Velikaya didaktika. Izbrannnye pedagogicheskie sochineniya [Great Didactic. Selected Pedagogical Works]. Moscow, Uchpedgiz Publ., 655 p. (In Russ.)
13. Altshuller, G.S. (2011). Nayti ideyu. Vvedenie v teoriyu resheniya izobretatelskikh zadach [Find an Idea. Introduction to the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving]. Moscow: Alpina Publishers, 400 p. (In Russ.)
14. Leontiev, A.N. (1975). Deyatel’nost’, soznanie, lichnost’. [Activity. Consciousness. Personality]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., 303 p. (In Russ.)
15. Ivanov, V.G., Sazonova, Z.S., Sapunov, M.B. (2017). Engineering Pedagogy: Facing Typology Challenges. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 8/9, pp. 33-42. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
Review
Views:
713
Email this article 