Evaluation of the Engineering Curriculum Elements for Compliance
https://doi.org/10.31992/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-7-9-21
Abstract
Rubrics have been developed to evaluate the level of compliance of curriculum elements with the recommendations of the CDIO-FCDI-FFCD Standards in the process of modernizing engineering programs for undergraduate, graduate and postgraduate studies. As an example, the author presents the results of the evaluation of engineering undergraduate program courses for compliance with the recommendations of the CDIO Standards in the form of total and differentiated ratings of the modules of the humanities and social sciences, natural sciences and mathematics, basic engineering and specialized professional courses. Based on the ratings, the initial (before modernization) and planned (after modernization) levels of compliance of the program modules with the recommendations of each of the 12 CDIO Standards are determined. Using the rubrics enables to involve all the instructors in the process of engineering program modernization.
About the Author
A. I. Chuchalin
Kuban State Technological University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander I. Chuchalin – Dr. Sc. (Engineering), Prof.
Address: 2, Moskovskaya str., Krasnodar, 350072
References
1. Переосмысление инженерного образования. Подход CDIO / Э.Ф. Кроули, Й. Малмквист, С. Остлунд, Д. Р. Бродер, К. Эдстрем; пер. с англ. С. Рыбушкиной; под науч. ред. А. Чучалина. М.: Изд. дом ВШЭ, 2015. 504 с. [Crawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund, S., Brodeur, D., Edström, K. Rethinking Engineering Education, the CDIO Approach. Second Edition. Springer, 2014 (In Russ.)]
2. Malmqvist, J., Hugo, R., & Kjellberg, M. (2015). A Survey of CDIO Implementation Globally – Effects on Educational Quality. Proceedings of 11th International CDIO Conference. Chengdu, China.
3. Petrovskaya, T. (2013). Using CDIO Concept to Develop Engineering Education in Tomsk Polytechnic University. Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference, MIT, USA.
4. Вайнштейн Ю.В., Шершнева В.А., Сафонов К.В. Идеология CDIO в обучении математике // Высшее образование в России. 2016. № 2. C. 75–82. [Vainshtein, Y., Shershneva, V., Safonov, K. (2016). CDIO Ideology in Math Training. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 2, pp. 75-82. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)]
5. Гафурова Н.В., Осипова С.И. Металлургиче ское образование на основе идеологии CDIO // Высшее образование в России. 2013. № 12. С. 137–139. [Gafurova, N., Osipova, S. (2013). Metallurgical Education based on CDIO Ideology. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 12, pp. 137-139. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)]
6. Осипова С.И., Рудницкий Э.А. Вовлечение стейкхолдеров в реализацию идеологии CDIO // Высшее образование в России. 2015. № 8/9. C. 39–45. [Osipova, S., Rudnitskiy, E. (2015). Integration of Stakeholders in the Implementation of CDIO Ideology. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 8/9, pp. 39-45. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)]
7. Подлесный С.А., Козлов А.В. CDIO: цели и средства достижения // Инженерное образование. 2014. № 16. С. 9–13. [Podlesniy, S., Kozlov, A. (2014). CDIO: Goals and Means of Achieving. Inzhenernoe obrazovanie = Engineering Education. No. 16. pp. 9-13. (In Russ.)]
8. Lunev, A., Zaripova, V., Petrova, I. (2013). Implementation of CDIO Initiative Approach at a Russian Regional University. Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference, MIT, USA.
9. Lunev, A., Fedotova, A., Rybakov, A. (2014). Complex Strategy of CDIO Initiative Implementation in a Regional Russian University. Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
10. Rebrin, O., Sholina, I., Berestova, S. (2014). Interdisciplinary Project for Bachelor Engineering Program. Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
11. Rechistov, G., Plotkin, A. (2014). Computer Engineering Educational Projects of MIPT-Intel laboratory in the Context of CDIO. Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
12. Petrova, Yu., Sevast’yanova, E., Bezuevskaia, V., Kuzin, D., Drenin, A. (2019). Project-Oriented Training of Bachelor’s Degree Students in Chemistry. Proceedings of the 15th International CDIO Conference, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark, June 25–27, 2019, pp. 133-141. DOI:https://doi.org/10.7146/aul.347
13. Osipova, S., Shubkina, O. (2019). Teaching Engineering Students: From Principles to Practices. Proceedings of the 15th International CDIO Conference, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark, pp. 313-322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/aul.347
14. Kontio, J., Roslöf, J., Edström, K., Naumann, S., Hussmann, P.M., Schrey-Niemenmaa, K., Karhu, M. (2012). Improving Quality Assurance with CDIO Self-Evaluation: Experiences from a Nordic Project. International Journal of Quality Assurance in Engineering and Technology Education. Vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 55-66.
15. Tio, F., Kong, J., Lim, R., Teo, E. (2014). Developing and Applying Rubrics for Comprehensive Capstone Project Assessment. Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
16. Georgsson, F., Kontio, J., Bennedsen, J. (2015). Improving the CDIO Self-Evaluation by Updat ing Self-Evaluation Rubrics. Proceedings of the 11th International CDIO Conference, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu, China.
17. Bennedsen, J., Georgsson, F., Kontio, J. (2016). Updated Rubric for Self-Evaluation (v.2.1). Proceedings of the 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland.
18. Чучалин А.И., Данейкина Н.В. Адаптация подхода CDIO к магистратуре и аспирантуре // Высшее образование в России. 2017. № 4 (211). С. 17–25. [Chuchalin, A.I., Daneikina, N.V. (2017). Application of CDIO Approach to MSc and PhD Engineering Programs. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 4 (211), pp. 17-25. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)]
19. Chuchalin, A. (2020). Evolution of the CDIO Approach: BEng, MSc and PhD level. European Journal of Engineering Education. Vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 103-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1422694
20. Чучалин А.И. Модернизация трёхуровневого высшего образования на основе ФГОС 3++ и CDIO++ // Высшее образование в России. 2018. Т. 27. № 4. С. 22–32. [Chuchalin, A.I. (2018). Modernization of Three-Cycle Higher Education Based on FSES 3++ and CDIO++. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 27, no 4, pp. 22-32. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)]
21. Chuchalin, A.I. (2019). CDIO Standards Implementation and Further Development in Russia. In: E. Smirnova, R. Clark (Eds.) Handbook of Research on Engineering Education in a Global Context. IGI Global, pp. 80-88.
22. Chuchalin, A. (2018). Three-Cycle Engineering Education based on the CDIO-FCDI-FFCD Triad. In: Clark, R., Hussmann, P. M., Järvinen, H.-M., Murphy, M. (Eds), Vigild, M. (2018). Proceedings of the 46th SEFI Annual Conference: Creativity, Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Engineering Education Excellence. European Society for Engineering Education SEFI, pp. 682-690.
23. Chuchalin, A.I. (2019). The CDIO-FCDI-FFCD Rubrics for Evaluation of Three-Cycle Engineering Programs. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 58-72.
24. Chuchalin, A., Barkhatova T., Kalmanovich S. (2018). Development and Implementation of the CDIO Approach at Kuban State Technological University. Proceedings of the 14th International CDIO Conference, Kanazava Institute of Technology, Kanazava, Japan, pp. 807-819.
Review
Views:
503
Email this article 