Reflections on Teaching and Studying the Scientific Laws
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-11-86-97
Abstract
The article aims to discuss the problems of teaching and studying the scientific laws. It is dedicated to the anniversary of Dmitriy Mendeleev’s Periodic Law, but the author discusses the scientific laws in a broad epistemological and educational context. In the first section of the article, the author determines the purpose of education at a research university on the basis of Wilhelm von Humboldt’s ideas. She emphasizes that, in contrast to school education, which is focused on the transfer of ready-made knowledge, university education should generate critical thinking. In the context of such distinction between educational goals, a research question is formulated. How to make the practice of teaching a scientific law truly relevant to research university, and not only and not so much to school education? The answer to this question consistently considers two interrelated aspects of the possible education of future researchers. The author describes the historical aspect of teaching the scientific laws through two strategies of the history of science – antiquarianism and presentism. She demonstrates that antiquarianism can contribute to the formation of critical thinking. The author reveals the ontological aspect of teaching the scientific laws and relates it with the critic of objectivism in interpretation of scientific knowledge. In conclusion she argues that the proposed approach may contribute to the generation of scientific thinking aimed at finding new knowledge.
Keywords
scientific law,
objectivism,
history of science,
ontological status of scientific law,
critical thinking,
antiquarianism,
presentism,
subject reality of science
Supporting agencies: The study was funded by Russian Foundation for Basic Research according to the research project №18-011-00281 “Historical Epistemology: Theoretical Foundations and Research Perspectives”.
About the Author
L. V. Shipovalova
St Petersburg University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Prof., Department of Philosophy of Science and Technology,
7/9, Universitetskaya emb., St. Petersburg, 199034
References
1. Mikhailov, O.V. (2019). Experience in Teaching Mendeleev’s Periodic Law at National Research University. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii =Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 78-85. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
2. Fadeev, G.N., Lebedev, Y.A., Dvulichanskaya, N.N. (2019). Modern Interpretation of the Periodic Phenomenon. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii =Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 69-77 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
3. Shipovalova, L.V. (2018). Contemporary Historical Epistemology. Analytical Review of Research Directions. Tsifrovoi uchyonyi: laboratoriya filosofa [The Digital Scholar: Philosopher’s Lab]. Vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 153-167. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
4. Stolyarova, O.E. (2018). Does Historical Epistemology Imply Historical Ontology? Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Filosofiya i konfliktologiya = Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies. Vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 369-380. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
5. Holbraad, M., Pedersen, M.A. (2017). The Ontological Turn: An Anthropological Exposition. Cambridge University Press. 354 p.
6. Kasavin, I.T. (2018). Scientific Realism, Ontology and Mysticism. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya = Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. Vol. 45, pp. 217-221. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
7. Dmitriev, I.S. (2004). Chelovek epokhi peremen. Ocherki o D.I. Mendeleeve i ego vremeni [Man of the Era of Change. Essays on D.I. Mendeleev and his Time]. St.-Petersburg: Khimizdat Publ. (In Russ.)
8. Humboldt, W. von (2002). On the Internal and External Organization of the Higher Scientific Institutions in Berlin. Transl. from German. Neprikosnovennyi zapas. No. 2 (22). (In Russ.)
9. Readings, B. (1996). The University in Ruins. Harvard University Press. 256 p. (Russian translation: Moscow: HSE Press, 2010, 304 p.)
10. Funtowicz, S.O., Ravetz, J.R. (1993), Science for the Post-normal Age. Future. Vol. 25, issue 7, pp. 739-755.
11. Fuller, S. (2018). The Sociology of Intellectual Life. The Carrier of Mind in and around the Academy. (Russian translation: Moscow: Delo Publ., 2018, 384 p.)
12. Kuznetsova, N.I. (2009). Presentism and Antiquarism – Two Pictures of the Past. Arbor Mundi. Issue 15, pp. 164-196. (In Russ.)
13. Druzhinin, P.A. (2019). Zagadka «Tablitsy Mendeleeva» Istoriya publikatsii otkrytiya D.I. Mendeleevym Periodicheskogo zakona [The Puzzle of the “Periodic Table”: The Publication History of the Mendeleev’s Discovery of the Periodic Law]. Moscow: NLO Publ., 164 p. (In Russ.)
14. Rozov, M.A. (1994). Presentism and Antiquarism – Two Pictures of the Past. Voprosy istorii estestvoznaniia i tehniki (VIET) = Studies in History of Science and Technology. No. 3, pp. 13-23. (In Russ.)
15. Latour, B. (2000). On Partial Existence of Existing and Nonexisting Objects. In: L. Daston (Ed.). Biographies of Scientific Objects. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 247-269.
16. Hartog, F. (2003). Régimes d’historicité. Présentisme et expériences du temps. Paris, Seuil, 272 p.
17. Ruby, J.E. (1986). The Origins of Scientific «Law». Journal of the History of Ideas. Vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 341-359.
18. Joy, L.S. (2008). Scientific Explanation from Formal Causes to Laws of Nature. In: Park, K., & Daston, L. (Eds). The Cambridge History of Science. Vol. 3: Early Modern Science. Cambridge University Press, pp. 70-105.
19. Daston, L., Stolleis, M. (Eds.) (2008). Natural Law and Laws of Nature in Early Modern Europe: Jurisprudence, Theology, Moral and Natural Philosophy. Ashdate, 338 p.
20. Daston, L., Galison, P. (2007). Objectivity. New York: Zone Books, 501 p.
21. Sapunov, M.B. (2012). To the Problem of Reality in History and Philosophy of Science. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 2, pp. 147-154. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
22. Rosova, S.S. (2012). Problems of Psychic Reality (Answer to Messrs Doubt and Ignorance. Vestnik NGU. Seriya Psikhologiya = Reflexio. Vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 86-95. (In Russ.)
23. Zuev, V.V. (2016). On the Way to the Theory of Biological Taxonomy. Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki = Philosophy of Science and Technology. Vol. 21, no 1, pp. 36-54 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
24. Husserl, E. (1965). Philosophy and the Crisis of European Man. In: Edmund Husserl. The Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy. Transl. by Q. Lauer. Harper & Row Publishers, New York, pp. 149-192. (Russian translation: E. Husserl. Sbornik rabot [Collected Papers]. Minsk: Harvest, Moscow: АST, 2000, pp. 625-666)
25. Rozov, M.A. (2006). Non-Classical Science and the Problem of the Objectivity of Knowledge Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii =Higher Education in Russia. No. 2, pp. 145-154. (In Russ.)
Review
Views:
430
Email this article 