Quality of Education: Pedagogical Aspect
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-12-87-96
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to analyze pedagogical approaches to the concept of the quality in higher education. The personality of a teacher is considered as a key component of quality assurance. The authors analyze the role of the teacher in modern society and teacher’s professional and personal qualities necessary to increase the effectiveness of the educational process. Particular attention is paid to comprehension of quality from the point of view of the main education process participants – students and teachers. The opinions of Russian and foreign teachers in relation to the ways to improve the quality of higher education and the effectiveness of different educational technologies are presented. Using a multidimensional approach to quality, the authors offer their conception of education quality, elements of quality and quality assurance conditions.
About the Authors
F. L. Ratner
Kazan (Volga region) Federal University Institute of International Relations
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Faina L. Ratner – Dr. Sci. (Education), Prof.
Address: 18, Kremlyovskaya str., Kazan, 420008, Russian Federation
N. V. Tikhonova
Kazan (Volga region) Federal University Institute of International Relations
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nataliya V. Tikhonova – Senior Lecturer
Address: 18, Kremlyovskaya str., Kazan, 420008, Russian Federation
References
1. Motova, G.N. (2018). Doubled Standards of the Quality Assurance: Russia in the Bologna Process. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 9-21 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
2. Baidenko, V.I., Selezneva, N.A. (2017). Quality Assurance in Higher Education: Up-to-Date Experience (Paper 2). Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 11 (217), рр. 122-136. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
3. Baidenko, V.I., Selezneva, N.A. (2017). Today’s Round of the Bologna Process: Continued Optimism. And a Little Bit about Russian… (Paper 1). Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 10 (216), pp. 94-108. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
4. Rubin, Yu., Soboleva, E. (2011). Internal Quality Assurance Procedures in Education. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 2, pp. 12-23. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
5. Chubik, P., Chuchalin, A., Zamyatin, A. (2011). The System of International Certification and Registration of Professional Engineers. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 4, pp. 86-90. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
6. Soboleva, E. (2011). Creating the Universities’ Quality Assurance Mechanisms: Exploring the Experience. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 11, pp. 148-155. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
7. Skakovskaya, L.N., Katauskayte, L.A. (2017). Quality Management System of Tver State University. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 5 (212), pp. 125-132. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
8. Blinov, V.I., Batrova, O.F., Esenina, E.Yu., Faktorovich, A.A. (2013). Modern Approaches to the Qualifications Assessment. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 5, pp. 100-106. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
9. Shevchenko, G.I., Gorovaya, V.I., Shevchenko, A.I. (2019). Monitoring of Professionally Important Qualities of Students in the Conditions of Electronic Information and Educational Environment. Standarty i monitoring v obrazovanii = Standarts and Monitoring in Education. No. 1, pp. 3-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/article_5c5406352247e1.51124218 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
10. Baidenko, V.I., Selezneva, N.A. (2016). Razvitie sistem obespecheniya kachestva v vysshem obrazovanii [The Development of Quality Assurance Systems in Higher Education: A European Perspective (Based on the Materials of the European Forums on Quality Assurance in Higher Education 2013–2016). Moscow: NITU MISiS Publ., 2016. 248 p. (In Russ.)
11. Sadovnichiy, V.A., Kruzhalin, V.I., Artyushina, I.A. (2008). [How to Calculate the Quality of Education]. Rektor vuza [Rector of the University]. No. 8, pp. 14-18. (In Russ.)
12. Andreev, V.I. (2010). [Globalization Challenges to Quality of Life, Quality of Education and Human Self-Development of the XXI Century]. Obrazovanie i samorazvitie [Education and SelfDevelopment]. No. 1 (17), pp. 3-12. (In Russ.)
13. Gubina, N.K., Sharova, M.A., Zaitseva, T.V, Bova, E.Yu. (2017). Life Strategies of Regional Higher School Students University and Quality of Their Educational and Social Capital. Istoricheskie, filosofskie politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kulturologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki = Historical, Philosophical, Political and Legal Sciences, Cultural Studies and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. No. 2, pp. 74-79. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
14. Coulon, A. (2005). Le métier d’étudiant: L’entrée dans la vie universitaire. Paris: Economica. 240 p.
15. Chuchalin, A.I. (2019). The CDIO ++ Approach to University Faculty Advanced Training for Research and Teaching Activities. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 18-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-5-18-36 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
16. Lukashenko, M.A., Ozhgikhina, A.A. (2019). Image of a University Professor: Students’ Views and Priorities. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 46-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-1-46-56 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
17. Rotanova, I.N., Kostenko, M.A. Kachestvo obrazovaniya: otsenku stavit student [The Quality of Education: The Student Puts the Mark]. Akreditatsiya v obrazovanii [Accreditation in Education]. Available at: http://www.akvobr.ru/ocenku_stavit_student.html (In Russ.)
18. Tre’yakov, V.S., Larionova, V.A. (2016). Open Online Courses as a Tool for Modernization of Educational Process in Universities. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 7 (203), pp. 55-66. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
19. Tikhonova, N.V. (2018). [The «Flipped Classroom» Method in Higher Education: Opportunities and Problems of Implementation]. Kazanskiy pedagogocheskiy jurnal [Kazan Pedagogical Journal]. No. 2, pp. 74-78. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
20. Tatarinov, K.A. (2019). Mobile Generation Training “Z”. Baltiyskiy gumanitarniy jurnal = Baltic Humanitarian Journal. Vol. 8, no. 2(27), pp. 103-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26140/bgz32019-0802-0024 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
21. Bondarenko, T.G., Kolmakov, V.V. (2018). Distance Education as an Active Educational Technology: Rationale for Implementation. Azimut nauchnyh issledovaniy: pedagogika i psihologiya = Azimuth of Scientific Research: Pedagogy and Psychology. Vol. 7, no. 3(24), pp. 53-57. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
22. Ilinskiy, I.M. (2016). On A “Proper Education” for Russia in the 21st Century. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie = Knowledge. Understanding. Skill. No. 3, pp. 5-31. DOI: http://dx.doi org/10.17805/zpu.2016.3.1 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
23. Joulia, D. (2003). À la recherche de la qualité dans l’enseignement/apprentissage des langues étrangères. Cahiers de l’APLIUT. Vol. XXII, no. 1, рp. 23-39.
24. Endrizzi, L. (2014). La qualité de l’enseignement: un engagement des établissements, avec les étudiants? Dossier de veille de l’IFÉ. Lyon: ENS de Lyon. No. 93, 44 p.
25. Perellon, J.-F. (2003). La qualité dans l’enseignement supérieur: reconnaissance des filières d’études en Suisse et en Europe: analyse d’une révolution. In: Collection Le savoir Suisse Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes. Lausanne, 134 p.
26. Chuchalin, A.I., Tayurskaya, M.S., Myagkov, M.G. (2014). Advanced Training for Management and Faculty Staff of Russian Universities in CDIO Standards Implementation. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 6, pp. 58-67. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
Review
Views:
1166
Email this article 