Competitiveness of Russian Universities in the Global System of Higher Education: Quantitative Analysis

Purpose – quantitative analysis and identification of determinants of Russian universities’ global competitiveness.

Methods. Parametric and non-parametric methods for data analysis and machine learning.

Results. The authors figured out the hidden determinants of international competitiveness of Russian universities and the national educational system of the Russian Federation. We proposed four working hypotheses. (1) The positions of Russian universities in the international QS ranking are different for metropolitan and regional universities. (2) The positions of Russian universities in the international QS ranking depend on the status of universities. (3) The positions of Russian universities in the international QS ranking differ depending on the participation of universities in the Russian Academic Excellence Project “5-100”. (4) The positions of Russian universities in the international QS ranking are different depending on the level of annual university income. We obtained dataset for the study from the analytical materials of the British consulting company QS, as well as information and analytical materials from the results of monitoring the effectiveness of educational institutions of higher education in the Russian Federation.

Conclusions. In the empirical part, we have established the significance of the university geographical location influence on its international competitiveness. We have found a high competitiveness level of Moscow and St. Petersburg universities. The international market for educational services does not give preference to universities with the status of a «national research» or «federal». Increased state funding, burdened with approved roadmaps of the Project Office of the Program 5-100, contributes to competitiveness only in the regional educational markets, which is still not enough to strengthen the global international competitiveness of Russian universities and the national educational system of the Russian Federation. Although the level of universities annual income was a significant factor in international competitiveness, university management efficiency played an important role, not only increased funding. Universities with greater institutional management freedom will have greater international competitiveness.

1. Salmi, J. (2009). The Challenge of Establishing World-Class Universities. Directions in Development; Human development. The World Bank. Washington, DC. 136 p. Available at: https://siteresources.worldbank.org/EDUCATION/Resources/278200-1099079877269/5476641099079956815/547670-1237305262556/WCU.pdf

2. Salmi J., Froumin I. (2013). Excellence Initiatives to Establish World-Class Universities: Evaluation of Recent Experiences. Educational Studies. No. 1, pp. 25-68. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

3. Marginson, S. (2011). Different Approaches to a Shared Goal: How Variations in State Traditions and Strategies are Differentiating the Approach to Building WCUs. In: WCU-4: Fourth International Conference on World-Class Universities (October 30 – November 2, 2011 – Shanghai, China). Proceedings. P. 25.

4. Satsyk, V. (2014). Determinants of Universities’ Global Competitiveness: Higher Education Development Strategies in Ukraine. Educational Studies. No. 1, pp. 134-161. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

5. Skvortsov, N. (2017). Competitiveness of Universities in the Global System of Higher Education: Challenges and Strategies. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. Vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 45-57. DOI: 10.24290/1029-3736-2017-23-4-45-57 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

6. Donetskaya, S. (2014). The Analysis of the Competitiveness of Russian Universities in World Rankings. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 1, pp. 20-30. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

7. Endovitsky, D. (2019). [Rankings and It’s Relevance to Three University Missions: Education, Science, Society. Voronezh State University Case]. In: V.А. Sadovnichy et al. (Eds). Three University Missions: Education, Science, Society. Moscow: Max Press Publ., pp. 111-124. (In Russ.)

8. Endovitsky, D. (2019). [The Moscow International Ranking “Three University Missions” as an Item for the Analysis of the Current State and Development Prospects of Universities]. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Problems of Higher Education. No. 1, pp. 5-11. (In Russ.)

9. Zadorozhnyuk, I.E., Kalashnik, V.M, Kireev, S.V. (2018). Moscow International University Ranking “The Three University Missions” in the Global Educational Space. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 31-40. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

10. Leonova, T.N., Malanicheva, N.V., Malanicheva, A.S. (2017). International Rankings as an Assessment Tool of the Competitiveness of Russian Universities. Vestnik universiteta [University Herald]. No. 10, pp. 125-130. (In Russ.)

11. Liu, Z., Moshi, G.J., Awuor, C.M. (2019). Sustainability and Indicators of Newly Formed WorldClass Universities (NFWCUs) between 2010 and 2018: Empirical Analysis from the Rankings of ARWU, QSWUR and THEWUR. Sustainability. Vol. 11. Issue 10. DOI: 10.3390/su11102745

12. Sowter, B. (2008). The Times Higher Education Supplement and Quacquarelli Symonds (THES – QS) World University Rankings: New Developments in Ranking Methodology. Higher Education in Europe. Vol. 33. Issue 2-3, pp. 345-347. DOI: 10.1080/03797720802254247

13. Sowter, B., Reggio, D., Hijazi, S. (2017). QS World University Rankings. Research Analytics: Boosting University Productivity and Competitiveness through Scientometrics. Pp. 121-136. DOI: 10.1201/9781315155890

14. Huang, M.-H. (2012). Opening the Black Box of QS World University Rankings. Research Evaluation. Vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 71-78. DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvr003

15. Torres-Samuel, M., Vásquez, C.L., Viloria, A., Varela, N., Hernández-Fernandez, L., PortilloMedina, R. (2018). Analysis of Patterns in the University World Rankings Webometrics, Shanghai, QS and SIR-SCimago: Case Latin America. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 10943 LNCS, pp. 188-199.

16. Levene, H. (1960). Robust Tests for Equality of Variances. Contributions to Probability and Statistics. Palo Alto, Calif.: Stanford University Press, pp. 278-292.

17. Bartlett, M. S. (1937). Properties of Sufficiency of Statistical Tests. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 160. Pp. 268-287.

18. Shapiro, S.S., Wilk, M.B. (1965). An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality. Biometrika. Vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 591-611.

19. Filliben, J.J. (1975). The Probability Plot Correlation Coefficient Test for Normality. Technometrics. Vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 111-117.

20. Kruskal, W.H., Wallis, W.A. (1952). Use of Ranks in One-criterion Variance Analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association. Vol. 47, no. 260, pp. 583-621.