Digital Transformation in Higher Education: A Case Study on Strategic Plans
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-29-3-9-23
Abstract
Digital transformation is considered as an inevitable process for higher education systems like all socio-economic institutions and systems. The digital transformation, which paradoxically incorporates both challenges and conveniences, has to become the focus of corporations’ strategies. The aim of this study is to determine the status of digital transformation in universities’ strategies. For this purpose, the strategic plans of 18 Turkish universities, which ranked at the top 1000 most often in the world rankings, were evaluated with the content analysis method. Findings indicate that expressions about the components of digital transformation in the strategic plans of the universities were gathered under 4 themes, 14 categories and 35 codes. The expressions of the universities about digital transformation are coded under the category of diversity and flexibility of learning technologies, especially education theme and distance/open learning. It is observed that universities have the least digital transformation strategies concerning research and social service missions. In this sense, it was concluded that universities could not perform digital transformation beyond technological infrastructure renewal into an integrated transformation model and strategic vision. The results of the study were compared with empirical and theoretical studies in the literature. For universities and future studies, it was proposed that Turkish universities are compareable with the universities abroad, which show the successful examples of the digital transformation, and that the quantitative and/or qualitative methods related to the subject can be applied by internal and external stakeholders, especially in the sector’s evaluations.
About the Author
Ö. H. Kuzu
Selcuk University
Turkey
Turkey
Ömür Hakan Kuzu – Dr. (PhD) of Business, Assist. Prof., Beysehir Ali Akkanat Faculty of Tourism
Selcuk University Beysehir Ali Akkanat Campus, Beysehir/Konya 42700
References
1. Mehaffy, G.L. (2012). Challenge and Change. Educause Review. vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 25–42. Available at: https://er.educause.edu/-/media/files/article-downloads/erm1252.pdf
2. Seres, L., Pavlicevic, v., Tumbas, P. (2018). Digital Transformation of Higher Education: Competing on Analytics. In: L.G. Chova, A.L. Martínez, I.C. Torres (Eds). 12th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (INTED2018) Conference Proceedings. valencia, Spain: IATED Academy. 5–7 March, 2018. Pp. 9491–9497. 10.21125/inted.2018.2348
3. Dexeus, C. (2019). The Deepening Effects of the Digital Revolution. In: E. Fayos-Solá, C. Cooper (Eds). The Future of Tourism: Innovation and Sustainability. Cham: Springer International Publishing. Pp. 43–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89941-1
4. Sandkuhl, K., Lehmann, H. (2017). Digital Transformation in Higher Education – The Role of Enterprise Architectures and Portals. In: A. Rossmann, A. Zimmermann (Eds). Digital Enterprise Computing. bonn: Gesellschaft für Informatik. S. 49–60. Available at: https://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/119;jsessionid=1A142A0814932bbEF0EE7D38FA224CF9
5. Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., vojt, G. (2011). Are Digital Natives A Myth or Reality? University Students’ Use of Digital Technologies. Computers & Education. vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004
6. Davidson, C.N., Goldberg, D.T. (2009). The Future of Thinking: Learning Institutions in a Digital Age. Massachusetts, USA: MIT Press. 288 p. Available at: https://dmlhub.net/wp-content/uploads/files/Future_of_Thinking.pdf
7. Seaton, D.T., Nesterko, S., Mullaney, T., Reich, J., Ho, A.D. (2014). Characterizing video Use in The Catalogue of MIT xMOOCs. eLearning Papers. vol. 37, pp. 33-41. Available at: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/ejemplar/483876
8. Almaraz-Menendez, F., Maz-Machado, A., & Lopez-Esteban, C. (2016). University Strategy and Digital Transformation in Higher Education Institutions: A Documentary Analysis. International Journal of Advanced Research. vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 2284–2296. http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/2337
9. Pedro, F. (2007). The New Millennium Learners: Challenging Our views on Digital Technologies and Learning. Digital Kompetanse. vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 244–264.
10. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon. vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
11. (2019). Framework for 21st Century Learning Definitions. Battelle for Kids. Available at: http://static.battelleforkids.org/documents/p21/P21_Framework_DefinitionsbFK.pdf
12. Collins, A., Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking Education in the Age of Technology: The Digital Revolution and the Schools. New york: Teachers College Press. 192 p.
13. Thiele, A.K., Mai, J.A., Post, S. (2014). The StudentCentered Classroom of the 21st Century: Integrating Web 2.0 Applications and Other Technology to Actively Engage Students. Journal of Physical Therapy Education. vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 80–93.
14. Brown, M. (2015). Six Trajectories for Digital Technology in Higher Education. Educause Review. vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 16–28. Available at: https://er.educause.edu/-/media/files/articledownloads/erm1541.pdf
15. Brown, J.S., Duguid, P. (1996). Universities in the Digital Age. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning. vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 11–19. doi: 10.1080/00091383.1996.9937757
16. Wissema, J.G. (2009). Towards The Third Generation University: Managing the University in Transition. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing. 252 p.
17. Pawlowski, K. (2009). The ‘Fourth Generation University’ as a Creator of the Local and Regional Development. Higher Education in Europe. vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/03797720902747017
18. Lukovics, M., Zuti, b. (2015). New Functions of Universities in the XXI. Century: “Fourth Generation” Universities. Transition Studies Review. vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 33–48. https://doi.org/10.14665/1614-4007-22-2-003
19. Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Research Policy. vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 109–123. doi: 10.1016/S00487333(99)00055-4
20. Etzkowitz H. (2002). The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government. Implications for Policy and Evaluation. Science Policy Institute, Stockholm. Available at: http://www.sister.nu/pdf/wp_11.pdf
21. Petkovics, I., Tumbas, P., Matković, P., baracskai, Z. (2014). Cloud Computing Support to University business Processes in External Collaboration. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica. vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 181–200. doi: 10.12700/APH.11.03.2014.03.12
22. Calvani, A., Fini, A., Ranieri, M. (2009). Assessing Digital Competence in Secondary Education. Issues, Models and Instruments. In: M. Leaning (Ed.). Issues in Information and Media Literacy: Education, Practice and Pedagogy. Santa Rosa, CA: Informing Science Press. Pp. 153–172.
23. Davey, L. (1991). The Application of Case Study Evaluations. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation. vol. 2, pp. 1–3. Available at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1031&context=pare
24. Merriam, S.b. (1988). Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-bass. 226 p.
25. Yin, R.K. (2003). Case Study Research Design and Methods (3rd ed.). Applied Social Research Methods Series (vol. 5). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 181 p.
26. Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 536 p.
27. URAP. (2019). 2019–2020 URAP World Ranking Press Release. Available at: http://tr.urapcenter.org/2019/2019-2020-URAP-Dunya-Siralamasi-Raporu.pdf
28. URAP. (2019). Status of Our Universities in 11 World General Ranking in 2018. Available at: http://tr.urapcenter.org/2018/2018-yILINDA-%C3%9CN%C4%b0vERS%C4%b0TELER%C4%b0M%C4%b0Z%C4%b0N-11-%C3%9CNyA-GENEL-SIRALAMASINDAK%C4%b0-DURUMU-26%20%C5%9EUbAT-2019.pdf
29. Corbin, J., Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 3 rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 379 p.
30. Best, J.W., Khan, J.v. (1993). Research in Education. 7 th ed. boston: Allyn and bacon. 435 p.
31. Coffey, A., Atkinson, P. (1996). Making Sense of Qualitative Data: Complementary Research Strategies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. 216 p.
32. Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. 6 th ed. London and New york, Ny: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. 638 p.
33. Yıldırım, A., Şimşek, H. (2008). Qualitative Research Methods in The Social Sciences. Ankara: Seçkin Publication. 366 p.
34. Stake, R. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. 192 p.
35. Miles, M.b., Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 352 p.
36. Lugosi, P., Jameson, S. (2017). Challenges in Hospitality Management Education: Pespectives from the United Kingdom. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management. vol. 31, pp. 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2016.12.001
37. Duderstadt, J.J. (2001). The Future of the University in the Digital Age. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. vol. 145, no. 1, pp. 54–72. Available at: www.jstor.org/stable/1558325
38. Kurt, A.A., Günüç, S., Ersoy, M. (2013). The Current State of Digitalization: Digital Native, Digital Immigrant and Digital Settler. Ankara University, Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences. vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 1–22. Available at: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/508712
39. Balula, A., Moreira, G., Moreira, A., Katenholz, E., Eusebio, C., breda, Z. (2019). Digital Transformation in Tourism Education. In: Z. Zadel, D.S. Jurdana (Eds). Tourism in Southern and Eastern Europe 2019 Conference Proceedings (5). Opatija-Croatia: University of Rijeka. 16–18 May 2019. Pp. 61–72.
40. Morellato, M. (2014). Digital Competence in Tourism Education: Cooperative-Experiential Learning. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism. vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 184–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313220.2014.907959
41. (2016). The 2018 Digital University. Staying Relevant in the Digital Age. Available at: https://www.pwc.co.uk/assets/pdf/the-2018-digital-university-staying-relevant-in-the-digital-age.pdf
42. Altbach, P.G. (2011). The Past, Present, and Future of the Research University. In: P.G. Altbach, J. Salmi (Eds.). The Road to Academic Excellence the Making of World-Class Research Universities. Washington DC: The World bank. Pp. 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8805-1
43. Lukovics, M., Zuti, b. (2013). Successful Universities towards the Improvement of Regional Competitiveness: “Fourth Generation” Universities. 53rd ERSA Congress: Regional Integration: Europe, the Mediterranean and the World Economy Conference Paper. Palermo, Italy: European Regional Science Association (ERSA). 27–31 August 2013. Pp. 1–17.
Review
Views:
3446
Email this article 