Preview

Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia

Advanced search

From Flipped Classroom to Flipped Learning: Evolution of the Concept and Its Philosophical Foundations

https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-3-86-95

Abstract

Flipped learning is actually considered as one of the most discussed educational concepts. The Russian researchers mainly focus on the technology of the flipped learning method and analyze the recent practice of its application at all levels of national education system. The purpose of the present article is to explore the theoretical backgrounds of the flipped learning. based on groundwork literature on flipped learning and related concepts and using a descriptive method of study the paper explores the fundamental features of the flipped learning, outlines the main steps in the development of this educational technology and shows its evolution from the basic “flipped classroom” model to the modern “flipped learning” concept. Today we still can see a simplified understanding of the “flipped classroom” technology, which reduces it to a simple inversion of homework and classroom work. The paper shows that while using the inversion of homework and classroom work as the base principle, the flipped learning implies more conceptual changes in the learning process, namely, a radical rethinking of the role of the teacher, the student and the content of their face-to-face time. Flipped learning can be considered as a kind of educational meta-strategy that creates optimal conditions for the application of a personalized approach to learning, as well as of all the basic tactics of active learning. The relevance of the work is due to the need to adapt the learning process in higher education to the changes in the national education system, as well as to global socio-economic changes. The article contributes to the positive attitude to the current transformation process in national education, and provides Russian practitioners with a theoretical basis and explanation of some of the critical issues of flipped learning.

About the Author

I. I. Gnutova
Kostroma State Agricultural Academy
Russian Federation

Irina I . Gnutova – Cand. Sci. (Philology), Assoc. Prof., the Department of Foreign Languages

34, Karavaevo Campus, Karavaevo, Kostroma region, 156530



References

1. Talbert, R. (2012). Inverted Classroom, Colleagues: vol. 9, issue 1, article 7. Available at: http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/colleagues/vol9/iss1/7

2. Kvashnina, O.S., Azhel’, yu.P. (2016). Analysis of Pedagogical Model of “Flipped Classroom” in Training English as Foreign One at Technical University. Alma Mater (Vestnik vysshei shkoly) = Alma Mater (Higher School Herald). No. 6, pp. 108-112. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

3. Volchenkova, K.N. (2019). Flipped Classroom for Doctoral Students: Evaluating the Effectiveness. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 94-103.

4. Tikhonova, N.v. (2018). The “Flipped Classroom” Method in Higher Education: Opportunities and Problems of Implementation. Kazanskii pedagogicheskii zhurnal = Kazan Pedagogical Journal. No. 2, pp. 74-78. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

5. Antonova, N.L., Merenkov, A.v. (2018). “Flipped Classroom” Model in the Higher Education System: Problems and Contradictions. Integratsiya obrazovaniya = Integration of Education. vol. 22, no. 2. pp. 237-247. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

6. Borzova, T.A. (2018). Principles of Organizing Self-Directed Learning of First-year Students within the Flipped Classroom Technology. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. vol. 27, no. 8-9, pp. 80-88. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2018-27-8-9-80-88 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

7. King, A. (1993). From Sage on the Stage to Guide on the Side. College Teaching. No. 41 (1), pp. 30-35. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27558571

8. Mazur, E. (1997). Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual Series in Educational Innovation. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 247 p.

9. Baker, J.W. (2000). The “Classroom Flip”: Using Web Course Management Tools to become the Guide by the Side. In: J.A. Chambers (Ed.), Selected Papers from the 11 th International Conference on College Teaching and Learning. Jacksonville, FL: Florida Community College at Jacksonville, pp. 9-17. Available at: http://www.classroomflip.com/files/classroom_flip_baker_2000.pdf

10. Lage, M., Platt, G., Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning Environment. Journal of Economic Education. No. 31 (1), pp. 30-43. DOI: 10.2307/1183338

11. Bergman, J., Sams, A. (2012). Flip your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. International Society for Technology in Education. 122 p. Available at: http://i-lib.imu.edu.my/NewPortal/images/NewPortal/CompE-books/Flip-your-Classroom.pdf

12. Bergmann, J., Sams, A. (2014). Flipped Learning: Gateway to Student Engagement. International Society for Technology in Education. 169 p.

13. Bloom, b. (1968). Learning for Mastery. Evaluation Comment (UCLA-CSIEP). No. 1(2), pp. 1-12.

14. Kant, I. (1999). Critique of Pure Reason. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant, 785 p. (Russian translation: Мoscow: Nauka Publ., 1999. 654 p.)

15. Rockmore, T. (2005). Kant on Representationism and Constructivism. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki = Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 35-46. (In Russ.)

16. Glasersfeld, E. von. (2015). Radical Constructivism and Teaching. In: Polonnikov, A.A., Korbut, A.M., Korchalova, N.D. Teoreticheskie voprosy obrazovaniya: khrestomatiya [Theoretical Issues of Education: Anthology. Part 2. Social Constructivism: Diversity of Educational Projects]. Minsk: bSU Publ., pp. 106-122. (In Russ.)

17. Gergen, K.J., Wortham, S. (2013). Social Construction and Pedagogical Practice. In: Gusakovsky M.A., Polonnikov, A.A., Korbut, A.M. Teoreticheskie voprosy obrazovaniya: khrestomatiya [Theoretical Issues of Education: Anthology]. Minsk: bSU Publ., pp. 172-200. (In Russ.)

18. Gergen, K.J. (2001). Social Construction in Context. London: SAGE Publication. 240 p. (Russian translation: Kharkiv, Humanitarian Centre, 2016, 328 p.)

19. Flipped Learning 3.0. The Next Generation. In: Flipped Learning Global Initiative. Available at: https://flglobal.org/flipped-learning-3-0/

20. Sazonov b.A. (2011). Individual Oriented Administration of Educational Process as a Condition of Modernization of Russian Universities. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 4, pp. 10-24. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

21. Barr, R.b., Tag, J. (2013). From Teaching to Learning – A New Paradigm for Undergraduate Education. In: Gusakovsky M.A., Polonnikov, A.A., Korbut, A.M. Teoreticheskie voprosy obrazovaniya: khrestomatiya [Theoretical Issues of Education: Anthology]. Minsk: bSU Publ., pp. 334-359.


Review

Views: 2589


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0869-3617 (Print)
ISSN 2072-0459 (Online)