Models for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Corporate Training Programs for Managers on the Principle of Cross-Functionality
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-3-97-107
Abstract
The article focuses on the analysis of models for efficiency evaluation of corporate training programs for managers based on the principle of cross-functionality taking into account the type of educational organization. According to the authors, the expected results of corporate re-training of managers on the basis of cross-functionality, first of all, is the formation of diverse, additional competences. The emergence of new types of employees with diverse competencies who follow certain rules of relations between employees contributes to the consistent increment of innovative knowledge among employees, which fully corresponds to the changing needs of production and the digital economy. The work was carried out on the basis of study of Russian and foreign scientific publications, practical experience of authors and the survey of developers of corporate training programs and specialists on the basis of the principle of cross-functionality. The 7 most commonly used assessment models have been identified. The results are of interest to corporate training and continuing education professionals during the planning and development phase of educational programs.
About the Authors
M. I. Inozemtsev
MGIMO University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Maxim I. Inozemtsev – Cand. Sci. (Law), Assoc. Prof., Department of Private International and Civil Law, Head of Dissertation Council Department
76, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454
M. K. Marushina
MGIMO University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Margarita K. Marushina – Ph.D. student, Department of Pedagogy and Psychology
76, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454
A. M. Mirzoyeva
MGIMO University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Angelica M. Mirzoyeva – Director of the MGIMO School of Business and International Proficiency
76, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454
References
1. Imai, M. (1986). Kaizen: The Key to Japan’s Competitive Success. business & Economics, 260 p. (Russian translation by T. Gutman. Moscow: Alpina Publisher, 2019. 564 p.)
2. Romanenko, N.M. (2019). The Formation of Research Abilities in Students Qualified in International Relations on the Example of Active Forms and Methods of Scientific Activity. Astra Salvensis. Supplement no. 1, August, pp. 289-311.
3. Roshchin, S. Yu., Solntsev, S.A. (2006). Rynok truda top-menedzherov v Rossii [Labour Market of Top-managers in Russia]. Moscow: HSE Publ., 251 p. (In Russ.)
4. Rysaev, I.Sh. (2008). Rukovoditel’ vysshego zvena: ucheb.-metod. kompleks dlya studentov [Senior Manager: Tutorial]. Ufa: RIO bAGSU Publ., 49 p. (In Russ.)
5. Gladilina, I., Belogurov, A., Zavrazhin, A., Shubina, I. and Bryukhanov, D. (2017). Modern Approaches to Assessing the Learners’ Achievements in Training Programs in Economics. European Research Studies Journal. vol. 20, no. 4A, pp. 531-541.
6. Dolzhenko, R.A. Podkhody k otsenke effektivnosti korporativnogo obucheniya [Approaches to Evaluate the Efficiency of Corporate Training]. Available at: http://econ.asu.ru/assets/files/edu-materials/menedzhment-konf/dolzhenko-statya.pdf (In Russ.)
7. Pesha, A.V., Koropets, O.A. (2017). [Analysis of Models Assessing the Effectiveness of Corporate Training and Staff Development]. Sovremennoe obrazovanie = Modern Education. No. 3, pp. 83-95. DOI: 10.25136/2409-8736.2017.3.24000 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
8. Udovidchenko, R.S., Kireev, V.S. (2016). [Model for Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Training of the Corporate Personnel]. Fundamental`ny`e issledovaniya = Fundamental Research. No. 5-2, pp. 284-288. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
9. Chulanova O.L., Timchenko Ya.A. (2016). Corporate Training and Methods of Evaluation: Approaches, Tools, Challenges and Ways to Overcome Them. Naukovedenie [Science Studies]. vol. 8, no. 1. Available at: http://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/13EvN116.pdf (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
10. Barney, M. (2002). Measuring ROI in Corporate Universities. In: Allen, M. (Ed). The Corporate University Handbook. N.Y: AMACOM, pp. 197-218.
11. Topno, H. (2012). Evaluation of Training and Development: An Analysis of various Models. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM). vol. 5, issue 2, pp. 16-22.
12. Sutton, B. (2006). Adopting a Holistic Approach to the valuation of Learning Programmes Deployed in Corporate Environments: A Project Submitted to Middlesex University in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Professional Studies. National Centre for Work based Learning Partnerships Middlesex University, April 2006. 198 p. Available at: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/2667/1/Sutton-D.Prof.pdf
13. Kocharyan, G. (2008). [Once More about Investing in Staff Development: Is the “Efficiency Formula” Possible?]. UBO.RU. Business education in Russia and Abroad. Available at: https://ubo.ru/articles/?cat=119&pub=2292 (In Russ.)
14. Sukhinina, Zh.E. [Evaluation of the Efficiency of External Education in Organization]. Proactive: Site of Training Agency. Available at: http://www.new.trening27.ru/articles/otsenkaeffektivnosti-vneshnego-obucheniya-v-organizatsii (In Russ.)
15. Shishlova, E.E., Kuritsyn, I.A. (2017). Sociocultural Dimension of a Professional Language Curriculum. Integratsiya obrazovaniya = Integration of Education. vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 709-722. DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.089.021.201704.709-722
16. Barnett, K., Mattox, J.R. (2010). Measuring Success and ROI in Corporate Training. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network. vol. 14, Issue 2, pp. 28-44.
17. Packard, T., Jones, L. (2015). An Outcomes Evaluation of a Leadership Development Initiative. Journal of Management Development. vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 153-168.
18. Black, A.M., Earnest, G.W. (2009). Measuring the Outcomes of Leadership Development Programs. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies. vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 184-196.
19. Watkins, K.E., Lysø, I.H., de Marrais, K. (2011). Evaluating Executive Leadership Programs: A Theory of Change Approach. Advances in Developing Human Resources. vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 208-239.
20. Udovidchenko, R.S., Kireev, V.S. (2014). Comparative Analysis of Models of the Evaluation of Learning Efficiency of the Personnel. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya = Modern Problems of Science and Education. No. 6. Available at: http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=16909 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
21. Solov’eva, I.A., Zakir’yanov, R.I. (2015). Complex Model of an Assessment of System Effectiveness of Development of Human Resources of the Organization. Neftegazovoe delo = Oil and Gas Business. No. 2, pp. 370-384. http://dx.doi.org/10.17122/ogbus-2015-2-370-384 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
22. Solov’eva, I.A., Zakir’yanov, R.I. (2016). Development of Complex Multicriteria Model of Estimation of the System of Training and Development of Human Resources of Organization. Naukovedenie [Science Studies]. vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1-17. DOI: 10.15862/63EvN216 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
23. Solov’eva I.A. (2016). [Improvement of the Efficiency Evaluation System for Teaching Personnel in Russian Organizations]. Innovatsionnaya nauka [Innovative Science]. No. 5-1 (17), pp. 173-176. (In Russ.)
24. Solov’eva, I.A., Gerasimova, M.v., Musina, D.R. (2017). Forming of Multicriteria Model of an Efficiency Evaluation of a System of Training and Development of the Organization. Naukovedenie [Science Studies]. vol. 9, no. 2. Available at: http://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/73EvN217.pdf (In Russ.)
25. Kucherov, D., Manokhina, D. (2017). Evaluation of Training Programs in Russian Manufacturing Companies. European Journal of Training and Development. vol. 41, issue 2, pp. 119-143. DOI: 10.1108/EJTD-10-2015-0084
26. Avdeeva, T., Kulik, A., Kosareva, L., Zhilkina, T., Belogurov, A. (2017). Problems and Prospects of Higher Education System Development in Modern Society. European Research Studies Journal. vol. 20, no. 4b, pp. 112-114.
Review
Views:
895
Email this article 