STUDENT AS “AN EDUCATION CONSUMER”: CONTENT OF THE CONCEPT
Abstract
About the Authors
Olga K. KrokinskayaRussian Federation
Sergey Yu. Trapitsin
Russian Federation
References
1. Molodin V.V., Gorin S.G. (2014) [Educational reform and students’ subjectivity prospects]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia]. No. 10, pp. 158-162. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
2. Rybakova S.B. (2013) [Formation and realization of students’ subjectivity in learning activities]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia]. No. 11, pp. 142-145. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
3. Merkulova O.P. (2012) [Problems of educational process evaluation by students]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [The Higher education in Russia]. No. 2, pp. 18-24. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
4. Vvedenskii V.N. (2012) [Social control of teacher’s activity at higher school]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia]. No. 4, pp. 120-127. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
5. Kolesnikov A.K., Lebedeva I.P. (2012) [Modelling customers’ satisfaction with educational services provided by higher education institutions]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia]. No. 12, pp. 37-45. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
6. Kir’yakova A.V., Mosienko L.V., Ol’khovaya T.A. (2013) [Development of student’s subjectivity in University axiosphere]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia]. No. 12, pp. 119-123. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
7. Maloshonok N.G. (2014) [Student engagement in learning in Russian universities]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia]. No. 1, pp. 37-44. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
8. Zelenev I.A., Tumanov S.B. (2012) [Teaching quality assessment in higher education institution within the context of students’ perceptions of teachers (sociological study experience)]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia]. No. 11, pp. 99-105. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
9. Collins R. (2009) Chetyre sotsiologicheskie traditsii [Four Sociological Traditions]. Moscow: “The Future territory” Publ., pp.134-192 (In Russ.)
10. Salmy J., Frumin I.D. (2013) [How the States achieve international competitiveness of the universities: Lessons for Russia]. Voprosy obrazovaniya [The Educational Questions], No. 1, pp. 25-68. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
11. Bordovsky G.A., Granichina O.A., Trapitsin S.Yu. (2009) Modeli i metody vnutrennego i vneshnego otsenivaniya kachestva obrazovaniya v vuzakh [Models and methods of internal and external evaluation of the quality of education in universities]. S.!Petersburg.: Knizhnyi Dom Publ. (In Russ.)
12. Bavina P.A., Vasilenko N.V., Lin’kov A.Ya., Trapitsin S.Yu. et al. (2009) Chelovek v organizatsionno-upravlencheskikh sistemakh: gumanitarnye tekhnologii i gumanizatsiya upravleniya [The man in the organization and management systems: the humanitarian and humanizing technology management]. S.!Petersburg: Knizhnyi Dom Publ. (In Russ.)
13. Mansurov V.A., Yurchenko O.V. (2009) [Sociology of professions (history, methodology, research practices)]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies]. No. 8, pp. 36-46. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
14. Krokinskaya O. (2007) [Methodological bases for modeling professional competence of experts who owns humanitarian technologies] Kompetentnostnyi podhod v podgotovke kadrov v oblasti gumanitarnykh tekhnologii [Competence approach to training in the field of humanitarian technologies]. S.!Petersburg: Herzen University Publ. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
15. Krokinskaya O.K. (2012) [Education for teachers: pressing problems through the eyes of participants of educational process]. Sotsiologiya obrazovaniya [Sociology of Education]. No. 1, pp. 79-94. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)