STUDENT AS “AN EDUCATION CONSUMER”: CONTENT OF THE CONCEPT
Abstract
The purpose of this article is justification of students’ status as consumers of educational products and users of education results. They are also characterized as competent agents to assess the quality of higher education. The subject of discussion is also a conceptual model of the main working concepts in the context of the problem. Sociological exchange theory is a methodological basis for the interpretation of the studied phenomena.The article deals with such concepts as education quality, students’ assessment of education quality, educational product and its main consumers. The students’ opinion is presented as a competent position to account for their views for designing educational politics of the University. The dynamics of the post!industrial shift of the main target groups of education consumers is shown in the article. This fact requires to change formulations of objectives of the University and to correct contents and modes of interaction between University and students. The arguments for individualization processes and learning outcomes for students are offered here. Thereby its importance to the strategic management of University is highlighted.
About the Authors
Olga K. Krokinskaya
Herzen State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergey Yu. Trapitsin
Herzen State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Molodin V.V., Gorin S.G. (2014) [Educational reform and students’ subjectivity prospects]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia]. No. 10, pp. 158-162. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
2. Rybakova S.B. (2013) [Formation and realization of students’ subjectivity in learning activities]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia]. No. 11, pp. 142-145. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
3. Merkulova O.P. (2012) [Problems of educational process evaluation by students]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [The Higher education in Russia]. No. 2, pp. 18-24. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
4. Vvedenskii V.N. (2012) [Social control of teacher’s activity at higher school]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia]. No. 4, pp. 120-127. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
5. Kolesnikov A.K., Lebedeva I.P. (2012) [Modelling customers’ satisfaction with educational services provided by higher education institutions]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia]. No. 12, pp. 37-45. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
6. Kir’yakova A.V., Mosienko L.V., Ol’khovaya T.A. (2013) [Development of student’s subjectivity in University axiosphere]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia]. No. 12, pp. 119-123. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
7. Maloshonok N.G. (2014) [Student engagement in learning in Russian universities]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia]. No. 1, pp. 37-44. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
8. Zelenev I.A., Tumanov S.B. (2012) [Teaching quality assessment in higher education institution within the context of students’ perceptions of teachers (sociological study experience)]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia]. No. 11, pp. 99-105. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
9. Collins R. (2009) Chetyre sotsiologicheskie traditsii [Four Sociological Traditions]. Moscow: “The Future territory” Publ., pp.134-192 (In Russ.)
10. Salmy J., Frumin I.D. (2013) [How the States achieve international competitiveness of the universities: Lessons for Russia]. Voprosy obrazovaniya [The Educational Questions], No. 1, pp. 25-68. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
11. Bordovsky G.A., Granichina O.A., Trapitsin S.Yu. (2009) Modeli i metody vnutrennego i vneshnego otsenivaniya kachestva obrazovaniya v vuzakh [Models and methods of internal and external evaluation of the quality of education in universities]. S.!Petersburg.: Knizhnyi Dom Publ. (In Russ.)
12. Bavina P.A., Vasilenko N.V., Lin’kov A.Ya., Trapitsin S.Yu. et al. (2009) Chelovek v organizatsionno-upravlencheskikh sistemakh: gumanitarnye tekhnologii i gumanizatsiya upravleniya [The man in the organization and management systems: the humanitarian and humanizing technology management]. S.!Petersburg: Knizhnyi Dom Publ. (In Russ.)
13. Mansurov V.A., Yurchenko O.V. (2009) [Sociology of professions (history, methodology, research practices)]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies]. No. 8, pp. 36-46. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
14. Krokinskaya O. (2007) [Methodological bases for modeling professional competence of experts who owns humanitarian technologies] Kompetentnostnyi podhod v podgotovke kadrov v oblasti gumanitarnykh tekhnologii [Competence approach to training in the field of humanitarian technologies]. S.!Petersburg: Herzen University Publ. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
15. Krokinskaya O.K. (2012) [Education for teachers: pressing problems through the eyes of participants of educational process]. Sotsiologiya obrazovaniya [Sociology of Education]. No. 1, pp. 79-94. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
Review
Views:
404
Email this article 