International ENTER Project: A New Pedagogical Training Approach for Engineering Educators
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-6-65-74
Abstract
The formation of a modern generation of engineers capable to drive changes that meet the requirements of the future necessitates a new approach in pedagogical training of engineering teachers. The international ENTER (EngineeriNg educaTors pEdagogical tRaining) project is being developed as part of EU Erasmus program focused on addressing the actual education needs from the standpoint of human and social capitals development both in Europe and in other countries. The ENTER project is aimed at the creation and development of an international platform for multilevel vocational training/retraining of technical universities teachers on the basis of the Eurasian interaction network. Surveys among employers, teachers, and engineering university students, as well as scientific periodicals analysis allowed us to determine the complex of universal and specific engineering and pedagogical competencies that educators should master not only for today, but also for the future needs. Based on the competency analysis, a three-level modular teacher training/retraining program (iPET program) has been developed and its international accreditation is planned.
About the Authors
F. T. ShageevaRussian Federation
Farida T. Shageeva – Dr. Sci. (Education), Full Prof., Department of Engineering Pedagogy and Psychology
Address: 68, Karl Marx str., Kazan, 420015
E. S. Mishchenko
Russian Federation
Elena S. Mishchenko – Dr. Sci. (Economics), Prof., Vice-Rector for International Activities
Address: 106, Sovetskaya str., Tambov, 392000
N. G. Chernyshov
Russian Federation
Nikolay G. Chernyshov – Cand. Sci. (Engineering), Assoc. Prof.
Address: 106, Sovetskaya str., Tambov, 392000
K. E. Nurgalieva
Kazakhstan
Kuralay E. Nurgalieva – Cand. Sci. (Phys. and Math.), Senior teacher, Department of Plasma Physics, Nanotechnology and Computer Physics
K. M. Turekhanova
Kazakhstan
Kunduz M.Turekhanova – Cand. Sci. (Phys. and Math.), Senior teacher
Address: 71, al-Farabi Ave., Almaty, 050040
Y. T. Omirzhanov
Kazakhstan
Yesbol T. Omirzhanov – Cand. Sci. (Law), Prof., Law Department, Director of International cooperation Department
Address: 8, Abai Ave., Medeu district, Almaty, 050010
References
1. Ivanov, V.G., Shageeva, F.T., Galikhanov, M.F. (2017). Continuous Training of Engineers for Innovative Economy in the Research University. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 26, no. 5 (212), pp. 68-78. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
2. Rumler, N. Staude, S., Friese, N. (2017). Development of an Innovative Learning Environment for Engineering Education. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Springer. Vol. 544, pp. 254-264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50337-0_22
3. Shitov, S.B. (2017). Outrunning Engineering Education in Modern Conditions (Social and Philosophical view). Alma mater (Vestnik vysshej shkoly) = Alma mater (Higher School Herald). No. 1, pp. 109-113. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
4. Yushko, S.V., Galikhanov, M.F., Kondratyev, V.V. (2019). Integrative Training of Future Engineers to Innovative Activities in Conditions of Postindustrial Economy. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 65-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2018-27-12-65-75 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
5. Zhurakovskiy, V.M., Vorov, A.B. (2016). [System Innovations in Engineering Education Models]. Professional’noe obrazovanie. Stolitsa [Professional Education. The Capital]. No. 8, pp. 17-24. (In Russ.)
6. Turekhanova, K.M., Akimkhanova, zh.E., Karwasz, G.P. (2019). Implementing EU Interactive Teaching Methods at Al-Farabi Kazakh National University. In: GIREP-ICPE-EPEC-MPTL 2019 Conference, Budapest, Hungary, p. 780.
7. Shageeva, F.T., Nazmieva, L.R. (2012). Module Technologies in Training Chemical-Process Engineers. In: 15th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning, ICL, Article no. 6402189.
8. Gourie, L.I. (2008). Poslediplomnoe obrasovaniye prepodavateley vusov v usloviyakh innovatsionnykh protsessov [Postdegree Education of Teachers of Higher Education Institutions in the Conditions of Innovative Processes]. Kazan: Shkola Publ., 243 p. (In Russ.)
9. Senashenko, V.S., Verbitskiy, A.A., Ibragimov, G.I., Osipov, P.N. et al. (2017). Engineering Pedagogy: Methodological Issues. Round Table Discussion. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 11 (217), pp. 137-157. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.); Teaching Staff Training, Higher School Pedagogy, and Engineering Pedagogy: Round Table Discussion. (2016). Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 6, pp. 62-86; No. 7, pp. 67-87. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
10. Ivanov, V.G., Sazonova, z.S., Sapunov, M.B. (2017). Engineering Pedagogy: Facing Typology Challenges. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 8-9, pp. 32-42. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
11. Kubrushko, P.F., Eprikyan, D.O. (2018). Engineering Pedagogy in Vocational Education: Methodological Aspect. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 83-87. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
12. Prikhodko, V.M., Polyakova, T.Yu. (2015). IGIP. Mezhdunarodnoe obshchestvo po inzhenernoi pedagogike: proshloe, nastoyashchee, budushchee [IGIP. International Society for Engineering Education: Past, Present, Future]. Moscow: Tekhpoligraftsentr Publ., 143 p. (In Russ.)
13. Melezinek, A., Auer, M. (2011). IGIP and the Trends in Engineering Education. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 12, pp. 35-39.
14. Solovyev, A.N., Prikhodko, V.M., Polyakova T.Yu., Sazonova, z.S. (2018). Russian Engineering Teachers as an Important Part of IGIP. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 38-45.
15. Terentev, E., Bekova, S., Maloshonok, N. (2018). The Crisis of Postgraduate Studies in Russia: What Bears Problems and How to Overcome Them. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis. Vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 54-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2018.05.049 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
16. Bednyi, B.I., Sapunov, M.B. et al. (2019). A New Model of Russian Doctoral Education: Problems and Prospects (round table). Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 130-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-1-130-146 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
17. Maloshonok, N.G., Terentev, E.A. (2019). Towards the Model of Doctoral Education: The Experience of Enhancing Doctoral Programs in Russian Universities. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. No. 3, pp. 8-42. DOI: 17323/1814-9545-2019-3-8-42 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
18. Chuchalin, A.I. (2014). Modernization of Engineering Education Based on CDIO International Standards. Inzhenernoe obrazovanie = Engineering Education. No. 16, pp. 14-29. URL: http://www.ac-raee.ru/filesen/io/m16/art_2.pdf
19. Galikhanov, M.F., Khasanova, G.F. (2019). Faculty Training for Online Teaching: Roles, Competences, Contents. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 51-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-2-51-62 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
20. Nurgalıeva K.E., Igenbaeva Á.S., Slámova Á.N. (2017). Guidelines for Laboratory Works on Simulation of Analog Electronic Devices in Multisim. Sovremennoe obrazovanэe v shkole, kolledje ı výze = The Modern Education in Schools, Colleges and HEIs. No. 2(37), pp. 18–19. (In Kazakh)