Quality of Education According to the Assessment of University’s Key Partners
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-8-9-129-141
Abstract
The article addresses the problems of the quality of education in general, including from the perspective of employers. The authors believe that the mechanism for assessing the quality of education should be implemented through the active participation of the University’s key partners and employers in the educational process.
The article presents the results of a study of the level of satisfaction with the quality of education of graduates estimated by enterprises that are the key partners of Orenburg State University (2020). The first set of questions involved an analysis of the degree of participation of employer organizations in the educational process and assessment of the level of training of university graduates. The second block included an assessment of personnel needs and demands on graduates when applying for a job, as well as an analysis of the prospects for developing forms of cooperation between employers in the region and the University.
In conclusion, we offer a list of recommendations for improving the effectiveness of internal independent assessment of the quality of education with the involvement of representatives of employers. The list includes recommendations aimed at enhancing their participation in improving the system of training for the region’s economy.
About the Authors
Zh. A. ErmakovaRussian Federation
Zhanna A. Ermakova – Dr. Sci. (Economics), Prof., rector
Yu. N. Nikulina
Russian Federation
Yulia N. Nikulina – Cand. Sci. (Economics), Assoc. Prof
References
1. Ermakova, Zh.A., Nikulina, Yu.N. The Quality of Education from the Viewpoint of Consumers of Educational Services at the University. Kreativnaya ekonomika = Creative Economy. Vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 725-734. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
2. Sapunov, M.B., Polonnikov, A.A. (2018). Academic Subject Problem: Epistemological Crisis and Its Overcoming. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 144-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2018-27-12-144-157 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
3. Baidenko, V.I., Selezneva, N.A. (2017). Quality Assurance in Higher Education: Up-to-Date Experience (Paper 2). Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 11 (217), рр. 122-136. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
4. Baidenko, V.I., Selezneva, N.A. (2017). Optics of Looking to the Future (Paper 3). Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 12 (218), pp. 120-132. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
5. Guba, K.S. (2019). Assessment of the Quality of Higher Education: Review of International Experience. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis. Vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 94-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2019.03.022 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
6. Motova, G.N., Navodnov, V.G., Kuklin, V.Zh., Saveliev, B.A. (1998). Sistemy akkreditatsii za rubezhom [Accreditation Systems Abroad]. Moscow, 180 p. (In Russ.)
7. Motova, G.N., Pykkö, R. (2012). Russian Higher Education and European Standards of Quality Assurance. European Journal of Education. Special Issue: Russian Higher Education and the Post-Soviet Transition. Vol. 47, issue 1, March, pp. 25-36.
8. Borovskaya, M.A., Shevchenko, I.K., Razvadovskaya, Yu.V., Marchenko, A.A. (2016). Economic Aspects of Managing Quality Parameters of the Educational Program in Higher School. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis. No. 104 (4), pp. 40-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/umj.2016.104.026 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
9. Nikitina, N.S., Nikolaeva, N.V. (2008). Approximate Methodology for Monitoring and Evaluating the Quality of Training in Higher Education. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis. No. 6, pp. 79-84. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
10. Erofeeva, O.V. (2014). Higher Education Quality: Students’ Role in Perfecting the University Educational Process. Vestnik PGGPU. Seriya: Psikhologicheskie i Pedagogicheskie Nauki = Bulletin of Perm State Humanitarian and Pedagogical University. Series: Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences. No. 2-2, pp. 49-52. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
11. Ignatiev, V.P., Varlamova, L.F., Stepanov, P.A. (2016). Students’ Involvement to Assess of Education Quality. Naukoemkie tekhnologii = Modern High Technologies. No. 12 (part 1), pp. 141-145. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
12. Gallyamov, R.R., Kuznetsova, Yu.A. (2017). Evolution of Leading Trends in the Quality of Higher Education as an Indicator of Socialization of the Economy in the Russian Region. Sotsiodinamika = Sociodynamics. No. 10, pp. 9-24. (In Russ.)
13. Kuznetsova, T.A., Repp, P.V. (2016). Coordination of Professional and Educational Standards as a Mechanism for Effective Management of Higher Education Quality. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis. No. 103(3), pp. 62-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/umj.2016.103.017 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
14. Drondin, A.L. (2020). Independent Assessment of the Quality of Russian Higher Education: What is the Point and What Can Be Improved. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii =Higher Education in Russia Vol. 29, no. 2 (29), pp. 41-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-2-41-49 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
15. Pospelov, V.K., Komissarova, N.N. (2011). Problems of Transition to a Level System of Training. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii =Higher Education in Russia. No. 10, pp. 3-11 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
16. Bolotov, V.A., Motova, G.N., Navodnov, V.G., Ryzhakova, O.E. (2016). On a New Conceptual Approach to Choosing the Best Educational Programs. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 11(206), pp. 5-16. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
17. Nikulina, Yu.N. (2019). Implementation of the Principles of Practice-Oriented Education in the Training System for the Economy of the Region. Upravlenie personalom i intellektual’nymi resursami v Rossii = Management of the Personnel and Intellectual Resources in Russia. No. 4 (43), pp. 38-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/article_5d7b9104863904.86143087 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)