WHAT IS IMPORTANT FOR POSTGRADUATES TO KNOW ABOUT THE ACADEMIC TEXTS?
Abstract
This paper is a continuation of a series of articles to assist graduate and postgraduate students of different specialties in writing their own scientific texts of different genres (abstract, article, dissertation, etc). The article considers invariant properties and main category features of scientific texts on the humanities and engineering science. The reasoning about the importance of acquiring the knowledge for a successful presentation of the scientific findings is given.
References
1. Kolesnikova N.I. (2010) [What is Important to Know about the Language and Register of Scientific Texts?]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 3, pp. 130-137. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
2. Kolesnikova N.I. (2010) [What is Important to Know about the Language and Register of Scientific Texts? (The Second Article)]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 6, pp. 144-148. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
3. Galperin I.R. (2004) Tekst kak ob’ekt lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya [Text as an Object of Linguistic Study]. Moscow: Editorial URSS Publ., 144 p. (In Russ.)
4. Kotyurova M.P. (2007) Kul’tura nauchnoi rechi: Tekst i ego redaktirovanie [The Culture of Scientific Speech: Text and Its Editing: Learning Guide]. Perm’: Perm State University, West+Ural Institute of Economics and Law Publ., 282 p. (In Russ.)
5. Kolesnikova N.I. (2009) Lingvodidakticheskaya kontseptsiya formirovaniya zhanrovoi kompetentsii uchashchikhsya v sisteme nepreryvnogo yazykovogo obrazovaniya [Linguistic and Didactic Concept of Forming Genre Competence of Learners in the System of Continuing Linguistic Education: Monograph]. Novosibirsk: NSTU Publ.; Moscow: Flinta; Nauka Publ., 408 p. (In Russ.)
6. Trosheva T.B. (1999) Funktsionirovanie rassuzhdeniya v protsesse razvitiya nauchnogo stilya russkogo literaturnogo yazyka XVIII–XX vv. (sopostavitel’no s drugimi funktsional’nymi raznovidnostyami) [Functioning of Argumentation in the Development of Scientific Style of the Russian Literary Language in XVIII–XX (Compared with Other Functional Varieties)]. Perm: Perm University Publ., 208 p. (In Russ.)
7. Kolesnikova N.I. (2015) Ot konspekta k dissertatsii: ucheb.posobie po razvitiyu navykov pis’mennoi rechi [From Abstract to Dissertation: Learning Guide on Developing Writing Skills]. Moscow: Flinta; Nauka Publ., 288 p. (In Russ.)
8. Danilevskaya N.V. (2005) Rol’ otsenki v mekhanizme razvertyvaniya nauchnogo teksta [The Role of Assessment in the Mechanism of Explicating a Scientific Text]. Perm’: Perm University Publ., 360 p. (In Russ.)
9. Bazhenova E.A. (1999) [Intertextuality of a Scientific Text]. Tekst. Uzory kovra: sb. statei nauch.- metod. seminara «TEXTUS» [Text. Carpet Patterns. Proc. Sci. and Method. Seminar “TEXTUS”]. St+Petersburg, Stavropol: Stavropol University Publ., No. 4, part 1: General problems of text study, pp. 83-90. (In Russ.)
10. Tret’yakova K.A., Korzhuev A.V., Sadykova A.R. (2014) [Pedagogic Research in the Context of a Dialogue between Author (Researcher) and Scientific Community]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 10, pp. 100-106. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.), Pp. 100-106
11. Chukaev O.V. (2001) Organizatsiya issledovatel’skoi raboty po pedagogike studentov pedvuzov [Organization of Research Work on Pedagogy of Students of Pedagogical Higher Educational Institutions: Teaching Manual on Special Course]. Tula: Tula State Pedagogical University Publ., 132 p. (In Russ.)
Review
Views:
369
Email this article 