Russian University Students about Distance Learning: Assessments and Opportunities

The forced shift to remote learning in universities in March 2020 raised the complex issues of organizing lifelong learning for students, conducting academic assessments and maintaining the stability of the educational institution in general for educational systems of all countries of the world. This paper examines peculiarities and general problems of distance learning in the higher education system. It is based on the materials of the sociological survey “Opinions of Russian universities’ students on the forced distance learning”, conducted in May-June 2020. 31,423 university students in all federal subjects of Russia were interviewed. Analysis of research data covers the following areas: organizational problems of transition to distance learning; resources used, organization of lectures and seminars, assessment of the positive and negative aspects of distance learning; perspectives, limitations and trajectories of distance learning implementation in Russian universities.

The article also provides comparative data on the analysis of the issues of distant learning of Russian and foreign researchers. The authors propose future-oriented measures for organizing distance learning in universities in the case of the introduction of quarantine restrictions, consider possible forms of combining distance and full-time education, the prospects for the introduction of digital technologies in the organization of training in universities.

1. Sherry, L. (1995). Issues in Distance Learning. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications. No. 1(4), pp. 337-365. Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Available at: https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/8937/

2. Phipps, R., Merisotis, J. (1999). What’s the Difference? A Review of Contemporary Research on the Effectiveness of Distance Learning in Higher Education. Institute for Higher Education Policy. April 1999. Available at: http://www.ihep.org/research/publications/whats-difference-review-conteilitary-research-effectiveness-distance-learning

3. Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., Zvacek, S. (2011). Teaching and Learning at a Distance: Foundations of Distance Education. American Journal of Distance Education. Vol. 25(3), pp. 201-204. DOI: 10.1080/08923647.2011.589757

4. Bowen, W. (2014). Higher Education in the Digital Age. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. Vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 150-153. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2014.2311873

5. Sergeev, A.G., Jigalov, I.E., Balandina, V.V. (2012). Vvedenie v electronnoe obuchenie [Introduction to E-Learning]. Vladimir: Vladimir State Univ. Publ., 182 p. Available at: http://e.lib.vlsu.ru/bitstream/123456789/2298/1/00838.pdf (In Russ.)

6. Krishnamurthy, S. (2020). The Future of Business Education: A Commentary in the Shadow of the Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Business Research. Vol. 117, pp. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.034

7. Surma, T., Kirschner, P. (2020). Technology Enhanced Distance Learning Should Not Forget How Learning Happens. Computers in Human Behavior. Vol. 110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106390

8. Hattie, J., Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Education Research. Vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

9. Gomez, E., Azadi, J., Magid, D. (2020). Innovation Born in Isolation: Rapid Transformation of an In-Person Medical Student Radiology Elective to a Remote Learning Experience During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Academic radiology. Official journal of the Association of University Radiologists. June. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2020.06.001

10. Qandil, A., Abdel-Halim, H. (2020). Distance e-Learning is Closer than Everybody Thought: A Pharmacy Education Perspective. Health Professions Education. June. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2020.05.004

11. Govindarajan, V., Srivastava, A. (2020). What the Shift to Virtual Learning Could Mean for the Future of Higher Ed. Harvard Business Review. March 31. Available at: https://hbr.org/2020/03/what-the-shift-to-virtual-learning-could-mean-for-the-future-of-higher-ed

12. Uroki stress-testa. Vuzi Rossii v usloviyakh pandemii i posle: Doklad predstaviteley rektorskogo soobshchestva na zasedanii Obshchestvennogo soveta pri Ministerstve nauki i vysshego obrazovaniya RF 3 iyulya 2020 g. [The Lessons of the Stress Test. Russian Universities in the Context of the Pandemic and after It: Report of Representatives of the Rector’s Community at the Meeting of the Public Council under the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation on July 3, 2020]. Available at: https://minobrnauki.gov.ru/ru/press-center/card/?id_4=2777 (In Russ.)

13. Agranovich, M.L. (2020). [Organization of Education in the Pandemic Conditions. Practice of the OECD Countries]. In: Gurevich, V.S., Drobyshevskiy, S.M., Kolesnikov, A.V., Mau, V.A., Sinel’nikov-Murylev, S.G. (Eds.) Monitoring ekonomicheskoy situatsii v Rossii. Tendentsii i vyzovy sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya 2020 [Monitoring of Economic Situation in Russia. Trends and Challenges of Social and Economic Development]. 2020. No. 9 (111), pp. 134-151. URL: https://www.iep.ru/files/text/crisis_monitoring/2020_9-111_April.pdf (In Russ.)

14. Minaev, A.I., Isaeva, O.N., Kiryanova, E.A., Gornov, V.A. (2020). Features of the Organization of University Activities in the Context of a Pandemic. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya = Modern Problems of Science and Education. No. 4. Available at: http://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=29858 (In Russ.)

15. Klyagin, A.V., Makarieva, A.Yu. (2020). Keysy bystrykh reaktsii vuzov v usloviyakh pandemii [Cases of Rapid Reactions of Universities in the Conditions of a Pandemic]. HSE Institute of Education. Available at: https://ioe.hse.ru/sao_universitycases (In Russ.)

16. Melnik, D. (2020). Vysshee obrazovanie v mire: kakie problemy vysvetila pandemiya [Higher Education in the World: What Problems Were Highlighted by the Pandemic]. TASS. 23.04. Available at: https://tass.ru/opinions/8306213 (In Russ.)

17. Kapasia, N., Pintu, P., Roy, A., Saha, J., Zaveri, A., Mallick, R., Barman, B., Das, P., Chouhan, P. (2020). Impact of Lockdown on Learning Status of Undergraduate and Postgraduate Students During COVID-19 Pandemic in West Bengal, India. Children and Youth Services Review. Vol. 116, September. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105194

18. Nguyen, D.V., Pham, G.H., Nguyen, D.N. (2020). Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Perceptions and Behaviors of University Students in Vietnam. Data in Brief. Vol. 31, August. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.105880

19. Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa-deh, R., Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating E-Learning Systems Success: An Empirical Study. Computers in Human Behavior. Vol. 102, pp. 67-86, January. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004

20. Moeller, J., Brackett, M., Ivecevic, Z., Whate, A. (2020). High School Students’ Feelings: Discoveries from a Large National Survey and an Experience Sampling Study. Learning and Instruction. Vol. 66, April. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101301

21. Jansen, R., van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Conijn, R., Kester, L. (2020). Supporting Learners’ SelfRegulated Learning in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & Education. Vol. 146, March. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103771

22. Rusli, R., Rahman, A., Abdullah, H. (2020). Student Perception Data on Online Learning Using Heutagogy Approach in the Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences of Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia. Data in Brief. Vol. 29, April. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.105152

23. Jowsey, T., Foster, G., Cooper-Ioelu, P., Jacobs, S. (2020). Blended Learning via Distance in Pre-Registration Nursing Education: A Scoping Review. Nurse Education in Practice. Vol. 44, March. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102775.