Game-based Methods for Competence “Teamwork and Leadership” Development: The Case of Engineering Students

The competence “teamwork and leadership” is one of the key and the most required in the modern professional environment. The article presents the experience of the Department of sociology, psychology and social management of Moscow Aviation Institute in the development of teamwork skills among students majoring in engineering.

Teamwork in the article is understood as an effective joint activity to achieve goals. Teamwork as a professional competence includes certain skills and abilities that are being formed gradually on the basis of interpersonal and intergroup communication. For the formation of team qualities, gamebased learning methods are used, which increase the effectiveness of pedagogical efforts. Game methods in comparison with traditional lectures and seminars involve more active communication, emotional colouring and visual demonstration of the results. The main task of a teacher is not to broadcast information and check its assimilation, but to stimulate the activity of students themselves. Game-based methods are both a diagnostic and corrective tool, they allow to identify already existing skills, activate the behaviour of students in the desired direction and consolidate the result. The article analyses the experience of using active training methods for the development of the competence “teamwork and leadership”. Trainings are conducted in several stages, on each of them certain tasks are being solved: the current level of competence development is evaluated, tasks are performed together, results are discussed, and an exercise is given to reinforce the skill. After the trainings, change in the participants’ attitude to teamwork and increase in the level of cohesion, trust, and involvement were revealed. The experience of organising of trainings turned out to be successful and useful not only for building competence, but also for identifying difficulties that prevent students from creating effective teams.

The materials of the article may be of interest to University teachers working on the development of students’ competence “teamwork” and using learning technologies.

1. Berkovich, M.I., Kofanova, T.A., Tikhonova, S.S. (2018). Soft Bachelor’s Skills: Evaluation of the Current Situation and Methods of Developing. Vestnik Voronezhskogo Gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: ekonomika i upravlenie = Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Economics and management. No. 4, pp. 63-68. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

2. Varlamova, D., Sudakov, D. (Eds). (2020). Atlas novykh professiy 3.0. [Atlas of New Professions 3.0]. Moscow: Intellectualnaya Literatura Publ., 470 p. (In Russ.)

3. Yakovleva, I.V., Kosenko, T.S. (2020). Competence and Knowledge Approaches: Philosophical and Educational Problems of Understanding and Application. Professionalnoe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire = Professional Education in the Modern World. Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 3474-3480.

4. Vasilyev, M.V. (2016). Problems of Team Functioning as Special Type of Social Group. Istoricheskaya i sotsialno-obrazovatelnaya mysl = Historical and Social-Educational Ideas. Vol. 8, no. 4/1, pp. 95-98. DOI: 10.17748/2075-9908-2016-8-4/1-95-98 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

5. Ryskulova, M.N. (2019). Group, Team, Command. Correlation of Concepts. Sovremennoe pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie = Modern Pedagogical Education. No. 10, pp. 191-194. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

6. Tannenbaum, S., Beard, R., Salas, E. (1992). Team Building and its Influence on Team Effectiveness: an Examination of Conceptual and Empirical Developments. In: K. Kelley (Ed.). Issues, Theory, and Research in Industrial Organizational Psychology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, pp. 117-153. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62601-1

7. Lewin, K. (1951). Field Theory in Social Science. New York: Harper, 346 p. (Russian translation by Surpina E.A. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proekt Publ., 2019, 313 p.)

8. Moreno, J.L. (1951). Sociometry, Experimental Method and the Science of Society. New York: Beacon house, 220 p. (Russian translation by A. Bokovikov. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proekt Publ., 2004, 383 p.)

9. Tuckman, B.W. (1965). Developmental Sequence in Small Groups. Psychological Bulletin. Vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 384-399. DOI:10.1037/h0022100

10. Woodcock, M., Francis, D. (1986). The Unblocked Manager: A Practical Guide to Self-Development. UK: Wildwood House Ltd. 235 p. (Russian translation by A.V. Vernikov. Moscow: Delo Publ., 1991. 320 p.)

11. Adizes, I.K. (2004). The Ideal Executive: Why You Cannot Be One and What to Do About It. Adizes Institute Publiсations. Santa Barbara, CA. (Russian translation by T.M. Gutman. Moscow: Alpina Pablisher, 2016. 360 p.)

12. Zinkevich-Evstigneeva, T.D. (2003). Effektivnaya komanda: shagi k sozdaniyu [Effective Team: Steps to Create]. St. Petersburg: Speech Publ., 128 p. (In Russ.)

13. Vilenskiy, M.Ya., Obraztsov, P.I., Uman, A.I. (2004). Tekhnologii professionalno-orientirovannogo obucheniya v vysshey shkole [Technologies of Professional-Oriented Training in Higher Education]. Moscow: Pedagogical society of Russia Publ., 192 p. (In Russ.)

14. Kolb, D. (2014). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Pearson FT Press Publ., 416 p.

15. Evtikhov, O.V. (2007). Trening liderstva [Leadership Training]. St. Petersburg: Rech’ Publ., 256 p. (In Russ.)

16. Vasiliev, N.N. (2008). Trening preodoleniya konfliktov [Conflict Resolution Training]. St. Petersburg: Rech’ Publ., 174 p. (In Russ.)

17. Belchikov, Ya.M., Birshtein, M.M. (1989). Delovye igry [Business Games]. Riga: Avots Publ., 303 p. (In Russ.)

18. Vinnik, V.K., Gonova, N.V. (2015). Gaming Simulation as a Means of Improving the Educational-Cognitive Activity in the Educational Process. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya = Modern Problems of Science and Education. No. 2 (part 1). URL: http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=20407 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

19. Granovskaya, R.M. (2003). Elementy prakticheskoy psikhologii [Elements of Practical Psychology]. St. Petersburg: Rech’ Publ., 655 p. (In Russ.)

20. Gladkaya, E.F. (2018). Game as a Way to Enhance Students’ Cognitive Activity. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 161-167. https://doi.org/10.31992/08693617-2018-27-10-161-167 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

21. Dilts, B., Epstein, T. (1995). Dynamic Learning. Cupertino, CA: Meta Publications Publ., 426 p. (Russian translation by A.A. Runikhin. Voronezh: NPO «MODEK» Publ., 2001, 416 p.)

22. Bordovskaya, N.V. (Ed). (2013). Sovremennye obrazovatelnye tekhnologii [Modern Educational Technologies]. Moscow: KNORUS Publ., 2013, 432 p. (In Russ.)