WHAT LECTURERS ARE PAID FOR:AN ANALYSIS OF UNIVERSITIES’ LEGISLATIVE ACTS
Abstract
The article presents the analysis of lecturers’ performance indicators, which were listed in 70 universities’ legislative acts. These universities are subordinated to the Ministry of education and science of Russian Federation. It was shown by foreign researchers that the system of assessment used in education had an impact on the professional activities of teachers and lecturers. Such management decisions as promotion, punishment, control were used after these assessments. We have analyzed lecturers’ performance indicators from the standpoint that these indicators can influence the professional activity of the lecturer. The frequency of lecturers’ performance indicators among 70 universities’ legislative acts wascalculated. Results of research work, administrative positions and previous achievements of lecturers (such as scientific statuses (candidate and doctor of science, academicians and etc.) and awards in research and teaching) are largely rewarded in the universities.
About the Author
Natalia V. Rodina
Center for Institutional Studies, National Research University “Higher School of Economics”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. De Bryujn H. (2005) Upravlenie po rezul’tatam v gosudarstvennom sektore [Performance Management in the Public Sector]. Moscow: Institute for complex strategic studies Publ., 192 p. (In Russ.)
2. Teichler U. (2008) Academic Staff in Germany: Per Aspera Ad Astra? In: The Changing Academic Profession in International Comparative and Quantitative Perspectives, International Seminar Reports 12, edited by Research Institute for Higher Education, Hiroshima University. pp. 131-152.
3. Levitt S., Dubner S. (2011) Frikonomika [Freakonomics]. Moscow: Harper Perennial Publ., 266 p. (In Russ.)
4. Bowman J.S. (2010) The Success of Failure: The Paradox of Performance Pay. Review of Public Personnel Administration. Vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 70-88.
5. Kuzminov Y.I., Yudkevich M.M. (ed.) (2011) Akademicheskoe soobshchestvo i akademicheskie kontrakty: vyzovy i otvety poslednego vremeni [Academic Community and Academic Contracts: Challenges and Responses in the Last Time]. Kontrakty v akademicheskom mire [Contracts in the Academic World]. Moscow: Higher School of Economics Publ., pp. 13-31. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
6. Kurbatova M.V., Levin S.N. (2013) [Effective Contract in Higher Education of the Russian Federation: Theoretical Approaches and Features of Institutional Design]. Zhurnal institutsional’nykh issledovanii [Journal of Institutional Studies]. Vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 55-80. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
7. Borovskaya M.A., Masych M.A., Shevchenko I.K. (2013) [Principles and Applications of Effective Incentive Contract in Research and Teaching Staff in Higher School]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 5, pp. 13-20. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
8. Vasilyeva O.G. (2013) [Effective Contract for Higher School]. Sovet rektorov [Council of Rectors]. No. 5, pp. 20-24. (In Russ.)
9. Galkowski A.G. (2013) [Effective Contract System and its Importance for the Modernization of Higher Education]. Sovet rektorov [Council of Rectors]. No. 10, pp. 12-18. (In Russ.)
10. Mikhalkina E.V., Aleshin V.A. (2013) [Effective Contract as an Institute of the Social and Labor Relations in Higher Education]. Terra Economicus [Terra Economicus]. Vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 89-99. (In Russ.)
11. Postnikov S.N., Andrienko A.V. (2015) [Effective Contract in Higher School: the Implementation Practice]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 5, pp. 37-45. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
12. Senashenko V.S., Khalin V.G. (2015) [On the Effective Contract in Higher School of Russia]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 5, pp. 27-37. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
13. Alaverdov A.R. (2015) [Evolution of Strategic Approaches to Motivation of the University Teaching Staff]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 5, pp. 45-53. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
14. Stulov V.I. (2009) [On the Formation of Stimulating Procedure and Evaluation of the Effective Functioning of Institutions within the Jurisdiction of the Federal Agency on Education]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz [University Management: Practice and Analysis]. No. 4, pp. 28-41. (In Russ.)
15. Koz’mina Ya.Ya. (2014) [Preferences of Professors about Research and Teaching]. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Educational Studies]. No. 3, pp. 135-151. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
Review
Views:
257
Email this article 