Preview

Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia

Advanced search

Social-Ecologic Oriented Curricula in Engineering Education: “Leonardo’s Oath” as an Answer to Janus-Headedness in Engineering Work

https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-1-115-124

Abstract

Any engineering activity is characterized by contradictions: social – between engineering problems and technical solutions and technological – between laws of nature and artificial engineering objects. This leads to the ethical dilemma of engineering work: when creating something new, social and environmental problems usually arise. This explains the “Janus-headedness” of the engineering profession: although the original intention is to do good, however, there are negative consequences that must be mitigated through new technical solutions that have the effect of creating improvements. “Leonardo’s oath” not only highlights this need, but also serves as a reference point for developing the engineering training programs which should be prepared specifically for this task. As a starting approach, the article suggests using the “sustainability triangle” – a model of social transformational effects in relation to the definition of the variables “social”, “economy” and “ecology” and their corresponding interdependence. It is shown that digitalization changes the “economy” setting in the sustainability triangle, which inevitably leads to consequences for the currently dependent variables “social “ and “ecology”. Digitalization requires, first, an economic approach, not environmental. It does not solve the fundamental problem: participation in the formation of a society to achieve socio-ecological balance is faced with the duality between the ethical necessity of forming and lack of real balance.

About the Authors

R. Dreher
University of Siegen
Germany

Ralph Dreher - PhD, Prof., Chair for Didactics of Technical Vocational Education

11, Breite Strasse, Siegen, 57076



V. V. Kondratyev
Kazan National Research Technological University, Tatarstan
Russian Federation

Vladimir V. Kondratyev - Dr. Sci. (Education), Prof., Director of the Centre for Professional Training and Advanced Retraining for Educators, Head of the Department of Methodology of Engineering Activity

68, K. Marx str., Kazan, 420015



M. N. Kuznetsova
Kazan National Research Technological University, Tatarstan
Russian Federation

Maria N. Kuznetsova - Cand. Sci. (Education), Assoc. Prof., the Department of Foreign Languages in Professional Communication

68, K. Marx str., Kazan, 420015



References

1. FEANI position paper on Code of Conduct: Ethics and Conduct of Professional Engineers, approved by the FEANI GENERAL Assembly on 29 September 2006. Available at: https://www.feani.org/sites/default/files/Position%20Paper%20Code%20of%20Conduct%20Ethics.pdf (accessed 10.12.2020)

2. Dreher, R. (2015). A Benchmark for Curricula in Engineering Education: The Leonardic Oath. In: 2015 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL). Florence, pp. 713-715, doi: 10.1109/ICL.2015.7318117

3. Crawley, E.F., Malmquist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D. R., Edström, K. (2014). Rethinking Engineering Education. The CDIO-Approach. Springer International Publishing, 311 p., doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-05561-9

4. Dreher, R. (2016). Der Leonardische Eid als Paradigma Ingenieurwissenschaftlicher Curricula: In: Kammasch, G; Dreher, R. Wie viel (Grundlagen) Wissen braucht technische Bildung? Wege zur technischen Bildung. Siegen, pp. 78-85, ISBN 978-3-9818728-0-4

5. Dreher, R., Gornov, A.O., Kondratyev, V.V. (2019). Concept of the Natural Structure of Engineering Education and the Code of Professional Ethics of an Engineer. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii= Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 76-85.

6. Vgl. hierzu die Auffassung von Kath, dass die Basisaktivität Leben-Gestalten vor allem technisch dominiert ist; Kath, F.M. (2002). Noch einmal Prüfen und Werten beim “Arbeiten mit Projekten”. In: Dreher, R., Spöttl, G. (Eds.). Arbeiten mit Projekten. Ein Ansatz für mehr Selbständigkeit beim Lernen. Bremen, pp. 121-129, ISBN 3-934836-57-7

7. Rademacher, F.-J. (2006). Leuchtturm in schwerer See. In: Politische Ökologie. Re-Vision. Nachdenken über ökologische Vordenker. Wien, pp. 46-49

8. Rauner, F., Heinemann, L. (2011). Begründungsrahmen für ein Kompetenzmodell beruflicher Bildung. In: Rauner, F. et.al. (Eds.). Messen beruflicher Kompetnezen. Band III: Drei Jahre KOMET-Testerfahrtung. Münster, pp. 17-50. ISBN: 978-3-643-11238-5

9. Quadrado, J.C., Zaitseva, K.K. (2019). New Pedagogical Approaches to Induce Sustainable Development Goals. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii =Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 50-56.

10. von Glasersfeld, E. (1991). Fiktion und Realität aus der Perspektive des radikalen Konstruktivismus. In: Rötzer, F., Weibel, P. Straegien des Scheins: Kunst, Computer, Medien. München, pp. 161-175. ISBN-10: 3924963533

11. Prikhodko, V., Sazonova, Z., Chechetkina, N. (2005): “Yin” and “Yan” of Engineering Creativity. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii=Higher Education in Russia. No. 11, pp. 21-26.

12. Quadrado, J.C., Zaitseva, K.K. Engineering Education: Interdisciplinarity in Global Teams [Electronic resources]. In: 45th SEFI Annual Conference 2017: Education Excellence for Sustainability: Proceedings, pp. 954-961. Available at: https://www.sefi.be/wp-content/uploads/SEFI_2017_PROCEEDINGS.pdf (accessed 10.12.2020)

13. Code of Ethics for Engineers. National Society of Professional Engineers. Available at: https://www.nspe.org/sites/default/files/resources/pdfs/Ethics/CodeofEthics/NSPECodeofEthicsforEngineers.pdf (accessed 10.12.2020)


Review

Views: 714


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0869-3617 (Print)
ISSN 2072-0459 (Online)