Institutional Traps of Digitalization of Russian Higher Education

In 2016-2018 the state in Russia adopted a package of program documents, which implies the transfer of education to the large-scale introduction of digital technologies. This phenomenon has been called “digitalization of education”. In scientific literature, electronization and digitalization are increasingly called one of the institutional traps for the development of Russian universities, since the corresponding institutional environment has not yet been formed due to the forced nature of innovations. As a result, the processes of introducing new technologies into education are still not regulated. Within the framework of the purpose of the study, the manifestations of the trap of electronization and digitalization of Russian higher education were analyzed on the basis of sociological data, and the theoretical modeling of the process of adaptation of educational agents to the institution of digitalization was carried out.

In the course of the study, the approaches were summarized that have been developed in discussions on educational digitalization. The article presents the author’s vision of the studied phenomenon as an institutional trap; as well as understanding of the institutional features and characteristics of electronization and digitalization in education.

The research method is the analysis of estimates obtained in the course of an expert survey which was conducted by the Vologda Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences among the representatives of the teaching staff of state universities in the Vologda region. In the course of this analysis, the indicators of educational digitalization as an effective innovation were clarified such as an increased accessibility of educational resources; simplification of communication and the process of transferring knowledge from teacher to student; increased opportunities for training specialists for the new (digital) economy; improving the quality of education in universities, etc. Based on the results of the empirical study, it has been determined that the conditions for the development of digitalization in Russian universities are currently ambiguous, which is closely related to the level of competitiveness of the educational organization.

The scientific novelty of the research consists in the presentation of an original matrix describing the process of university employees adaptation to the conditions of digital transformation of education. The matrix is proposed on the basis of a sociological analysis of the impact of the trap of electronization and digitalization on the activities of educational agents. The matrix can be taken into account in the practice of higher education management.

1. Mannakov, T.V. (2013). Contradictions between Formal and Informal Institutions of Small Business in the Russian Economy. Intellekt. Innovatsii. Investitsii = Intellect. Innovation. Investments. No. 3, pp. 48-52. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

2. Berezhnaya, I.F. (2014). The Question of Designing a Nonlinear Educational Process in Higher Education. Vestnik VGTU = Bulletin of Voronezh State Technical University. No. 5-2, pp. 1620. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

3. Liebowitz, S.J., Margolis, S.E. (1995). Path Dependence, Lock-In, and History. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization. No. 11 (1), pp. 205-226, doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jleo.a036867

4. Vardy, F. (2010). Institutional Traps. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publica-tion/238732739_Institutional_Traps (accessed 14.02.2021).

5. Balatsky, E.V. (2012). Institutional and Technological Traps: Analysis of Ideas. Zhurnal ekono-micheskoy teorii = Journal of Economic Theory. No. 2, pp. 48-63. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

6. Sukharev, O.S. (2010). Institutional Changes and Hierarchical Structures - III. Kapital strany = Capital of the Country. Aug 11. Available at: http://www.kapital-rus.ru/articles/article/178191 (accessed 14.02.2021). (In Russ.)

7. Mampaey, J. (2018). Are Higher Education Institutions Trapped in Conformity? A Translation Perspective. Studies in Higher Education. No. 43, pp. 1241-1253, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2016.1242566

8. Veretennikova, N.V. (2009). Institutional Traps of the Russian System of Higher Education. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika = Tomsk State University Journal of Economics. No. 1 (5), pp. 5-13. Available at: http://journals.tsu.ru/economy/&journal_page=archive&id=727&article_id=26677 (accessed 14.02.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

9. Zhuk, A.A., Fursa, E.V. (2019). Narrative Analysis of Institutional Traps in the Sphere of Education and Science in Russia. Zhurnal institutsional’nykh issledovaniy = Journal of Institutional Studies. No. 11 (1), pp. 176-193, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2019.11.1.176-193 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

10. Volchik, V.V. (2019). Institutional Traps in Education and Science Sector under Conditions of Optimization. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoy teorii = Russian Journal of Economic Theory. No. 16 (4), pp. 783-795, doi 10.31063/2073-6517/2019.16-4.14 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

11. Volchik, V.V., Maslyukova, E.V. (2019). Reforms, Tacit Knowledge and Institutional Traps in Education and Science. Terra Economicus. Vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 146-162, doi: 10.23683/20736606-2019-17-2-146-162 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

12. Murphy, M., Costa, C. (2019). Digital Scholarship, Higher Education and the Future of the Public Intellectual. Futures. No. 111, pp. 205-212, doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2018.04.011

13. Kalantzis, M., Cope, B. (2010). The Teacher as Designer: Pedagogy in the New Media Age. E-Learning and Digital Media. Vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 200-222, doi: 10.2304/elea.2010.7.3.200

14. Goulao, M., Fambona, J. (2012). Digital Literacy and Adults Learners’ Perception: The Case of a Second Chance University. Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, No. 46, pp. 350-355, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.121

15. Goh, P., Sandars, J. (2019). Digital Scholarship - Rethinking Educational Scholarship in the Digital World. MedEdPublish. Vol. 8, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.15694/mep.2019.000085.1

16. Pearce, N. Weller, M., Scanlon, E., Kinsley, S. (2010). Digital Scholarship Considered: How New Technologies Could Transform Academic Work. In education. Vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 33-44. Available at: https://ineducation.ca/ineducation/article/view/44 (accessed 14.02.2021).

17. Meikle, G., Young, S. (2012). Media Convergence: Networked Digital Media in Everyday Life. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 242 p.

18. Ellahi, A., Zaka, B., Sultan, F. (2017). A Study of Supplementing Conventional Business Education with Digital Games. Journal of Educational Technology & Society. Vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 195-206. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26196130 (accessed 14.02.2021).

19. Bowen, W.G. (2015). Higher Education in a Digital Age. Princeton University Press, 232 p.

20. Kasatkin, P.I., Kovalchuk, Yu.A., Stepnov, I.M. (2019). The Role of Modern Universities in the Formation of a Digital Upward Wave of Kondratyev’s Long Cycles. Voprosy ekonomiki [Issues of Economics]. No. 12, pp. 123-140, doi: 10.32609/0042-8736-2019-12-123-140 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

21. Efimov, V.S., Lapteva, A.V. (2018). Digitalization in the System of Development Priorities of Russian Universities: An Expert View. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz = University Mana,gement: Pmctice and Analysis. Vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 52-67, doi: 10.15826/umpa.2018.04.040 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

22. Surnina, N.M. (2019). Paradoxes of the Formation of Digital Generations. Awareness of Culture Is a Guarantee of Society Renewal. In: Osoznaniye kul’tury - zalog obnovleniya obshchestva. Perspektivy razvitiya sovremennogo obshchestva,: Materialy XX Vseros. nauch. prakt. konf. (Sevastopol’, 12-13 aprelya 2019) [Comprehension of Culture is the Key to the Renewal of Society. Prospects for the Development of Modern Society (Sevastopol, 12-13 Apr 2019): Collection of articles]. Sevastopol: Ribest Publ., pp. 110-114. (In Russ.).

23. Selwyn, N. (2016). Minding Our Language: Why Education and Technology Is Full of Bullshit ... and What Might Be Done about It. Learning, Media and Technology. No. 41, no. 3, pp. 437-443, doi: 10.1080/17439884.2015.1012523

24. Sladek, P., Valek, J. (2018). (Pseudo) Digitization in Education. EDULEARN18 Proceedings, pp. 9212-9218, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2018.2162

25. Starkey, L. (2011). Evaluating Learning in the 21st Century: A Digital Age Learning Matrix. Technology, Peda,gogy and Education. Vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 19-39, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2011.554021

26. Mertala, P. (2019). Paradoxes of Participation in the Digitalization of Education: A Narrative Account. Learning, Media & Technology, pp. 1-14, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.202 0.1696362

27. Harari, Y.N. (2015). Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. NY: Harper, 464 p.

28. Klyachko, T.L. [Digitalization of Education - Hopes and Risks]. Vesti obrazovaniya [News of education]. Available at: https://vogazeta.ru/articles/2018/2/26/blog/2148-tsifrovizatsiya_obrazovaniyanadezhdy_i_riski (accessed 14.02.2021). (In Russ.).

29. Trubnikov, S., Trubnikov, A. (2018). [Digitalization of the Russian School]. Kmsnaya vesna,. 9 June. Available at: https://rossaprimavera.ru/article/336d883e?gazeta=/gazeta/281 (accessed 14.02.2021). (In Russ.).

30. Chetverikova, O.N. (2019). Tsifrovoy totalitarizm. Kak eto delayetsya v Rossii [Digital Totalitarianism. How It is Done in Russia]. Moscow: Knizhnyi mir, 320 p. (In Russ.).

31. Evzrezov, D.V., Mayer, B.O. (2014). “Education 2030” - Challenge to the Education System. 1. Foresight of Education - A Plan to Create “People of One Button”? Vestnik NGPU [Bulletin of NGPU]. No. 2 (18), pp. 118-132, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1402.11 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

32. Betelin, V. B. (2019). Problems and Prospects of Education in the Post-Industrial Information Society. Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii nauk = Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 582-592, doi: https://doi.org/l0.31857/S0869-5873896582-592 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

33. Zhukova, G.K. (2016). [Foresight Saga or Idols of Global Education in Russian Education]. Iz-brannye analiticheskiye materialy SPb RIATS Rossiyskogo tsentra strategicheskikh issledo-vaniy = Selected Analytical Materials of the St. Petersburg RIAC Russian Center for Strategic Studies. SPb.: Youth Discussion Club SPb RIAC RISS, pp. 33-66. (In Russ.)

34. Melnik, P.B. (2017). Methodology for the Formation of Expert Pools and Groups for Conduction of Expert-Analytical Researches. Innovatika i ekspertiza = Innovatics and Expert Examination. No. 1 (19), pp. 39-54. Available at: http://inno-exp.ru/archive/19/innov_2017-1_39-54. pdf (accessed: 14.02.2021).

35. Golovchin, M.A. (2019). [Education in the Institutional Dimension: Landscape and Traps]. Human Progress. Vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1-16, doi: 10.34709/IM.156.4 (In Russ.).

36. Ansoff, I., Edward, J.M. (1988). The New Corporate Strategy. Wiley, 258 p.

37. Dzhurinsky, A.N. (2019). Digital Education in Western Europe and the USA: Hopes and Reality. Sibirskiy peda,gogicheskiy zhurnal = Siberian Pedagogical Journal. No. 3, pp. 162-168, doi: 10.15293/1813-4718.1903.16 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

38. Sukharev, A.V. (2019). “Digitalization” of Education - Philosophical and Ethnofunctional Psychological Aspects. Tsifrovoy uchenyy: laboratoriya filosofa = Digital Scientist: Laboratory of a Philosopher. Vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 36-42, doi: 10.5840/dspl20192448 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

39. Romm, M.V. (2002). Adaptatsiya lichnosti v sotsiume: Teoretiko-metodologicheskiy aspect [Personal Adaptation in Society: Theoretical and Methodological Aspect]. Novosibirsk: Siberian Publishing Company RAS, 275 p. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

40. Sukharev, O.S. (2018). Adaptation of Agents and Systems as a Characteristic of Management. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya = International Journal of Management Theory and Practice. No. 4, pp. 22-36. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).