The Role of Higher Education in Reproduction of Social Inequality in the Labor Market of Kazakhstan

The author analyzes how the modern education system contributes to the formation of socio-economically determined choice of higher education, where the latter includes a decision on continue studying, choosing a university and specialty.

The functioning of the higher education system is analyzed in the context of the interconnections of education, the labor market and family resources, which reflect the movement of human capital and current trends in social mobility in Central Asia, as exemplified by Kazakhstan.

The article presents data from a study conducted among young professionals aged 21 to 29 years with a different level of education. The sample represents the Republic of Kazakhstan and amounts to 1000 respondents. The survey was conducted using the technique of personal formalized interviews at the respondents’ work place.

The data obtained indicate that the expansion of accessibility of higher education in Kazakhstan is accompanied by its stratification, which is projected in the inequality in the labor market for young people with a different «background» of family capital. This trend is hidden. The family’s resource capital affects the range of choice of educational trajectory (level of education, university, specialty), in the future, the level of education and prestige of a young specialist’s university determine career opportunities.

1. Shnarbekova, M.K. (2018). The Effects of Family Capital on Kazakh Youth Strategies in the Choice of Higher Education. Integratsi-ya obrazovaniya = Integration of Education. Vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 712-727, doi: 10.15507/1991-9468.093.022.201804.712-727 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

2. Zborovsky, G.E., Ambarova, P.A. (2020). The Formation and Development of Foreign Sociology of Higher Education: A Review. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 33-50. doi: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-11-33-50 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

3. Bathmaker, A.-M. (2015). Thinking with Bour-dieu: Thinking after Bourdieu. Using ‘Field’ to Consider Inequalities in the Changing Field of English Higher Education. Cambridge Journal of Education. Vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 61-80, doi: 10.1080/0305764X.2014.988683

4. Jackson, M., Erikson, R., Goldthorpe, H.J., Yaish, M. (2007). Primary and Secondary Effects in Class Differentials in Educational Attainment: The Transition to A-Level Courses in England and Wales. Acta Sociologica. Vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 211-229. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20459999 (accessed 21.02.2021).

5. Breen, R., Goldthorpe, J.H. (1997). Explaining Educational Differentials: Towards a Formal Rational Action Theory. Rationality and Society. Vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 275-305, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/104346397009003002

6. Сорокин П.А. Социальная стратификация и мобильность // Сорокин П.А. Человек. Цивилизация. Общество / Общ. ред., сост. и предисл. А.Ю. Согомонов: Пер. с англ. М. : Политиздат, 1992. 543 с. [Sorokin, P.A. Social mobility. N.Y.; L. : Harper & Brothers, 1927].

7. Loveday, V. (2015). Working-Class Participation, Middle-Class Aspiration? Value, Upward Mobility and Symbolic Indebtedness in Higher Education. The Sociological Review. Vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 570-588, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12167

8. Mok, K.H. (2016). Massification of Higher Education, Graduate Employment and Social Mobility in the Greater China Region. British Journal of Sociology of Education. Vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 51-71, doi: 10.1080/01425692.2015.1111751

9. Denice, P. (2015). Does It Pay to Attend a For-Profit College? Vertical and Horizontal Stratification in Higher Education. Social Science Research. Vol. 52, pp. 161-178, doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.02.002

10. Gerber, T.P., Cheung, S.Y. (2008). Horizontal Stratification in Postsecondary Education: Forms, Explanations, and Implications. Annual Review of Sociology. Vol. 34, pp. 299-318, doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/an-nurev.soc.34.040507.134604

11. Robertson, S.L., Dale, R. (2013). The Social Justice Implications of Privatisation in Education Governance Frameworks: A Relational Account. Oxford Review of Education. Vol. 39, Review 4, pp. 426-445, doi:10.1080/03054985.2013.820465

12. Mok, K.H., Wu, A.M. (2016). Higher Education, Changing Labour Market and Social Mobility in the Era of Massification in China. Journal of Education and Work. Vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 77-97, doi:10.1080/13639080.2015.1049028

13. Mok, K.H., Neubauer, D. (2016). Higher Education Governance in Crisis: A Critical Reflection on the Massiflcation of Higher Education, Graduate Employment and Social Mobility. Journal of Education and Work.. Vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1-12, doi: 10.1080/13639080.2015.1049023

14. Chung, A.S. (2012). Choice of For-Profit College. Economics of Education Review. Vol. 31, pp. 1084-1101, doi: 10.1016/j.econ-edurev.2012.07.004

15. Brand, J.E., Xie, Yu. (2010). Who Benefits Most from College? Evidence for Negative Selection in Heterogeneous Economic Returns to Higher Education. American Sociological Review. Vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 273-302, doi: https://doi. org/10.1177/0003122410363567

16. Darolia, R., Koedel, C., Martorell, P., Wilson, K., Perez-Arce, F. (2015). Do Employers Prefer Workers Who Attend For-Profit Colleges? Evidence from a Field Experiment. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. Vol. 34, no. 4, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21863

17. Hagelskamp, C., Schleifer, D., DiStasi, Ch. (2014). Profiting Higher Education? What Students, Alumni, and Employers Think about For-Profit Colleges. New York, NY : Public Agenda. 50 p. Available at: https://www.publicagenda.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/ProfitingHigherEduca-tion_PublicAgenda_2014.pdf (accessed 21.02.2021).

18. Lee, S. (2016). Massiflcation without Equalisation: The Politics of Higher Education, Graduate Employment and Social Mobility in Hong Kong. Journal of Education and Work. Vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 13-31, doi: 10.1080/13639080.2015.1049024

19. Borjesson, M., Broady, D. (2016). Elite Strategies in a Unified System of Higher Education. The case of Sweden. L’Annefe Sociologique. Vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 115-146. Available at: https://www.cairn.info/revue-l-annee-sociologique-2016-1-page-115.htm (accessed 21.02.2021).

20. Sheng, X. (2017). Cultural Capital, Family Background and Education: Choosing University Subjects in China. British Journal of Sociology of Education. Vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 721-737, doi: 10.1080/01425692.2016.1158638

21. Binder, A.J., Davis, D.B., Bloom, N. (2016). Career Funneling: How Elite Students Learn to Deflne and Desire “Prestigious” Jobs. Sociology of Education. Vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 20-39, doi: 10.1177/0038040715610883

22. Shnarbekova, M. (2018). The Motivations Behind Educational and Professional Choices of Kazakhstani Youth (Based on the Results of Sociological Studies). Russian Education & Society. Vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 370-380, doi: 10.1080/10609393.2018.1473700

23. Shiner, M., Noden, Ph. (2015). ‘Why Are You Applying There?’: ‘Race’, Class and the Construction of Higher Education ‘Choice’ in the United Kingdom. British Journal of Sociology of Education. Vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 1170-1191, doi: 10.1080/01425692.2014.902299

24. Twomey, C., Boyd, J. (2016). Class, Social Equity and Higher Education in Postwar Australia. Australian Historical Studies. Vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 8-24, doi: 10.1080/1031461X.2015.1122071

25. Anthony, A.J. (2016). (No) Harm in Asking: Class, Acquired Cultural Capital, and Academic Engagement at an Elite University. Sociology of Education. Vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 1-19, doi: 10.1177/0038040715614913

26. Jerrim, J., Chmielewski, A.K., Parker, P. (2015). Socioeconomic Inequality in Access to High-status Colleges: A Cross-Country Comparison. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility. Vol. 42, pp. 20-32, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2015.06.003

27. Crompton, R. (1998). Class and Stratification. An Introduction to Current Debates. Cambridge : Polity Press, 272 p.

28. Shavit Y., Arum R., Gamoran, A., Menachem, G. (2007). Stratification in Higher Education: A Comparative Study. Palo Alto : Stanford University Press, 504 p.