LABORATORY OF SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS: RUSSIAN PERSPECTIVE
Abstract
The development of academic writing competence is an institutional responsibility of universities. To achieve this goal, most prestigious North American and European universities established writing centers where tutors, who have excellent academic writing skills and have been specially trained, help their fellow students improve their writing assignments. However, writing centers in Russian universities have proved to be true laboratories for scholarly communications as tasks they have to solve are conceptually different from those of overseas universities and the aims they attempt to reach are by far more challenging. One of such aims is to provide university researchers with expert help in order to develop their professional competencies so that they could significantly improve their publication outcomes and, as a consequence, succeed in the global academic community.
About the Author
Elena M. Bazanova
National University of Science and Technology “MISiS”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Carino P. (2003) Power and Authority in Peer Tutoring. In: Pemberton M.A., Kinkead J. (eds). The Center Will Hold: Critical Perspectives on Writing Center Scholarship. Utah State University Press, Logan. pp. 96116.
2. CarterTod S. (1995) The Role of the Writing Center in the Writing Practices of L2 Students, PhD thesis Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, USA.
3. Corbett S.J. (2013) Negotiating Pedagogical Authority: The Rhetoric of Writing Center Tutoring Styles and Methods. Rhetor. Rev. 32 (1). pp. 8198.
4. Williams J. (2005) Writing Center Interaction: Institutional Discourse and the Role of Peer Tutors. In: BardoviHarlig K., Hartford D. (eds) Interlanguage Pragmatics: Exploring Institutional Talk. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Inc., Mahwah, New Jersey. pp. 3763.
5. Korotkina I.B. (2013) [Academic Writing: on the Way to Conceptual Unity]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 3, pp. 136142 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
6. Ostrovskaya E.S., Vyshegorodtseva O.V. (2013) [Academic Writing: Concept and Practice of Academic Writing in English]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 7, pp. 104113. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
7. Bruce I. (2011) Theory and Concepts of English for Academic Purposes. Palgrave Macmillan. 227 p.
8. Pavlova I.P., Bazanova Е.М. (2013) [On Problems of Lexical Competence Acquisition and Computerassisted Tools for Solving Them]. Vestnik MGLU [Bulletin of Moscow State Linguistic University]. No. 12 (672), pp. 5974. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
9. Nuzha I.V., Shchemeleva I.Yu. (2013) [ReadingToWrite Approach in English for Academic Purposes]. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta [Bulletin of Northern (Arctic) Federal University]. No. 5, pp. 113122. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) 10. Graves D., Hansen J. (1983) The Author’s Chair. Language Arts. Vol. 60 (2), pp. 176183.
10. Flower L. (1987) The Role of Task Representation in ReadingtoWrite Reading to Write: Exploring a Cognitive and Social Process. N.Y., pp. 538.
11. Savitskaya N.S., Danilenko M.D. (2011) [Using Authentic Video Materials to Develop Foreign Language Speaking Skills in Classroom Setting]. Filologicheskie nauki: voprosy teorii i praktiki [Philological Sciences: Issues of Theory and Practice]. No. 2 (9), pp. 15253. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
12. Grishenkova G.A. (1995) Metodika ispolzovaniya delovykh igr pri obuchenii menedzherov inostrannomu yazyku (intensivniy kurs, nemetskii yazyk) [Methodology of Using Business Cases Used to Teach Managers a Foreign Language (Intensive Course, German): PhD thesis]. Moscow, 25 p.
Review
Views:
531
Email this article 