Systematic Approach to Teaching Academic Writing: Practical Experience
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-7-105-116
Abstract
The article describes the practical implementation of an experimental model for teaching academic writing to non-linguistic students of humanities at three levels of higher education. Improving the quality of domestic scientific publications submitted to high-ranking journals requires new effective pedagogical technologies. Theory and methodology analysis, as well as empirical observations show that the problems faced by Russian-speaking authors of academic texts can be divided into two categories: strong Russian accent that creates the language barrier and hinders understanding, and flawed academic style that leads to the cross-cultural academic barrier. The described ten-year study involved 25 students of Petrozavodsk State University, aged 17 to 28, who subsequently completed bachelor’s, master’s and postgraduate programs. At each of the three stages, the participants completed a set of tasks aimed at consistent and systematic formation of academic writing competence through writing abstracts (bachelors), conference proceedings (master’s students) and full-text academic articles (postgraduate students). To collect and process the data, the researchers used an open-ended questionnaire, the observation method, expert assessment, and descriptive statistics. The study results showed that the systematic approach helps to effectively eliminate structural and stylistic writing problems over the course of studies. However, the difficulties associated with the manifestation of the Russian accent in written English-language academic discourse are more resistant. The authors make the conclusion that the systematic development of academic writing skills in English will help to overcome obstacles for the internationalization of Russian science.
About the Authors
I. E. AbramovaRussian Federation
Irina E. Abramova – Dr. Sci. (Philology), Assoc. Prof.
33, Prospect Lenina, Petrozavodsk, 185910
A. V. Ananyina
Russian Federation
Anastasia V. Ananyina – Senior Lecturer
33, Prospect Lenina, Petrozavodsk, 185910
References
1. Dobrynina, O.L. (2015). Propaedeutics of Errors in Abstracts of Papers Written in Russian. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 7, pp. 42-50. Available at: https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/241/191 (accessed 06.05.2021) (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
2. Dugartsyrenova, V.А. (2016). Issues and Challenges in Teaching Academic Writing to Non-Native English Speakers: The Case of HSE. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 6, pp. 106-112. Available at: https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/456/406 (accessed: 17.01.2021) (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
3. Shimanovskaya, L.А. (2013). Analysis of Typical Errors in Abstracts Written in the English Language Abstracts of Research Papers on Engineering Ecology. Vestnik Kazanskogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta = Bulletin of Kazan Technological University. Vol. 16, no. 24, pp. 240-244. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
4. Bolsunovskaya, L.M., Rymanova, I.Е. (2020). Academic Writing: Difficulties and Possible Solutions for Engineering Students. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 77-85, doi: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-10-77-85 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
5. Eremina, V.M. (2016). Some Features of Teaching Writing Abstracts in English. Uchenye zapiski Zabaikal’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Professional’noe obrazovanie, teoriya i metodika obucheniya = Scholarly Notes of Transbaikal State University. Series: Professional Education, Theory and Methodology of Education. Vol. 11, no 6, pp. 86-92, doi: 10.21209/2308-8796-2016-11-6-86-92 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
6. Chuikova, E.S. (2016). Academic Writing: Relevant Content for Russia. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 12 (207), pp. 59-67. Available at: https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/903/824 (accessed 06.05.2021) (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
7. Matsuda, P.K. (2003). Process and Post-Process: A Discursive History. Journal of Second Language Writing. Vol. 12, issue 1, pp. 65-83, doi: 10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00127-3
8. Cheng, An. (2019). Examining the “Applied Aspirations” in the ESP Genre Analysis of Published Journal Articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. Vol. 38, pp. 36-47, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.12.005
9. Ivanič, R. (2004). Discourses of Writing and Learning to Write. Language and Education. Vol. 4, issue 3, pp. 220-245, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780408666877
10. Obdalova, O.А. (2018). Cognitive-Discursive Technology in Teaching Foreign Language Intercultural Communication. Yazyk i Kul’tura = Language and Culture. No. 44, pp. 279-305, doi: 10.17223/19996195/44/18 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
11. Korotkina, I.B. (2018). English for Research Publication Purposes as a New Field of Educational Studies. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya pedagogika = Russian and Foreign Pedagogics. Vol. 1, no. 4 (52), pp. 115-130. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
12. Weier, Ye. (2018). Overview of Academic Writing in China: A Response to Wesley O’Morrow’s Materials Review, “Texts in Context: Textbook Choice in an Evolving ELT Environment”. NYS TESOL Journal. Vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 66-73. Available at: http://journal.nystesol.org/january2018/8WeierYe.pdf (accessed 06.05.2021).
13. Holliday, A., Aboshiha, P., Swan, A. (Eds.). (2015). (En)Countering Native-speakerism: Global Perspectives. Series: Palgrave Advances in Language and Linguistics. London : Palgrave Macmillan, 226 p., doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137463500
14. Chovanec, J. (2012). Written Academic Discourse in English: From Local Traditions to Global Outreach. Brno Studies in English. No. 38(2), pp. 5-16, doi: 10.5817/BSE2012-2-1
15. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines. Journal of Business Research. Vol. 104, pp. 333-339, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
16. Moradi, M., Karimpour, Z. (2012). The Effect of Online Peer Feedback on the Academic Writing Ability of Iranian EFL Learners. International Education Studies. Vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 113-117, doi: 10.5539/ies.v5n2p113
17. Tonogbanua, J.R. (2018). Exploring Collaborative E-Portfolio Project for Teaching and Learning Academic Writing. Asian EFL Journal. Vol. 20, issue 12, pp. 173-193. Available at: https://www.elejournals.com/asian-efl-journal/the-asian-efl-journal-quarterly-volume-20-issue-12-3-december-2018/ (accessed 06.05.2021).