Distance Education: Imbalance between Possibilities and Threats
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2022-31-1-89-97
Abstract
Purpose: To quantify the opportunities and threats arising from the spontaneous expansion of distance learning in the wake of the pandemic and measures to counteract its spread.
Research methods: ex-pert analysis, fuzzy logic, comparative analysis.
Results and conclusions. The analysis of three groups of experts’ opinions: employers, university professors and students showed not-high values of revealed possibilities, connected with distance learning. Among them the average level of assessment reached: the increase of the level of computer literacy and the possibility of learning without disconnecting from the main activity in any geographical location. The latter opportunity is given more importance by employers than by teachers and students. Many threats of distance learning are evaluated as having a very high and high importance. The highest level of threat of reduction of the level of practical knowledge is marked by all expert groups. Almost the same level of significance was assigned by all expert groups to the negative impact of long-term computer use on students’ health. Opinions of expert groups differ with regard to other threats. Employers are the most cautious about them, they single out several other significant threats connected with the learning process – decrease of emotional component of the educational process and teachers’ lack of mastery of computer technologies which does not provide transfer of the necessary amount of information to students. Teachers and students assess these threats as less significant. The threats noted actualize the need to: strengthen the practical orientation of training in both distance and face-to-face format, expanding the competence of teaching staff in the field of computer technology, developing a system to counteract the negative impact of long-term use of computers on the health of students.
About the Authors
D. А. EndovitskyRussian Federation
Dmitry А. Endovitsky – Dr. Sci. (Economics), Full Prof., Rector, Chairman of the Regional Council of University Rectors, Chairman of Association of Higher Education Institutions in Chernozem Region
1, University sq., Voronezh, 394018
I. E. Risin
Russian Federation
Igor E. Risin – Dr. Sci. (Economics), Full Prof., the Department of Economics and Management of Organization
eLibrary AutorID: 420920
1, University sq., Voronezh, 394018
Yu. I. Treshchevsky
Russian Federation
Yuriy I. Treshchevsky – Dr. Sci. (Economics), Full Prof., the Department of Economics and Management of Organization
ResearcherID 2017-12-18
1, University sq., Voronezh, 394018
E. A. Rudnev
Russian Federation
Evgeniy A. Rudnev – PhD student, the Department of Economics and Management
1, University sq., Voronezh, 394018
References
1. Larionova, V.A., Semenova, T.V., Murzakhanova, E.M., Daineko, L.V. (2021). Economic Aspects of Forced Transition to Distance Learning, or What Price Universities Paid for Distance Learning. Voprosy obrazovaniya =Educational Studies Moscow. No. 1, pp. 138-157, doi: 10.17323/1814-9545-2021-1-138-157 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
2. Lazareva, O.P., Moroz, N.A. (2021). Distance Learning in Pandemic Conditions: Opinion of Teachers and Students. Siberian Socium. Vol. 5, no. 1 (15), pp. 50-67, doi: 10.21684/2587-8484-2021-5-1-50-67 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
3. Pcheunova, L.I., Kubanova, M.Y. (2020). Peculiarities of Organizing E-Learning in University under Distance Education. Izvestiya Severo-Kavkazskoi gosudarstvennoi akademii = Proceedings of the North Caucasus State Academy. No. 4 (26), pp. 3-9. Available at: https://ncsa.ru/upload/images/news/doc_2021-03-11_09-12-54.pdf (accessed 09.12.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
4. Bagdasarova, N.A., Chmykhova, E.V., Bogdanov, V.I. (2003). Psychological Aspects of Distance Education. Innovatsii v obrazovanii = Innovations in Education. No 5. Р. 78-91. URL: https://edit.muh.ru/mags_innov/ (accessed 09.12.2021) (In Russ.).
5. Blokhovtsova, G.G., Malikova, T.L., Simonenko, A.A. (2016). Prospects for Distance Learning. Novaya nauka: strategii i vektory razvitiya [New Science: Strategies and Development Vectors: Proc. Int. Conf., Izhevsk, 2016, May 19–21]]. Agency of International Research Publ., pp. 89-92. (In Russ.).
6. Clark, E. (2007). Distance Learning: A Way to Succeed. Novye tekhnologii i formy obucheniya [New Technologies and Forms of Learning]. No. 5 (7), pp. 52-59. (In Russ.).
7. Kuzmina, L.V. (2012). The Advantages and Disadvantages of Distance Learning. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii = Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. No. 1, pp. 8-10. Available at: elibrary_17707952_68453805.pdf (accessed 09.12.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
8. Tantsura, T.A. (2020). Aspects of Distance Learning in Modern Conditions. Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovaniya = World of Science, Culture, Education. No. 2 (81), pp. 355-358, doi: 10.24411/1991-5497-2020-00326 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
9. Shatunovsky, V.L. (2014). Organization of Educational Process of Distance and Distance and Correspondence Form. Vestnik orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, RGU nefti i gaza imeni I. M. Gubkina = Vestnik of Orenburg State University. No. 2 (163), pp. 177-182. Available at: http://vestnik.osu.ru/2014_2/33.pdf (accessed 09.12.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
10. Tabachnikova, M.B. (2017). Upravlenie izmeneniyami sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoi i institutsional’noi sredy regiona. Proektnyi podkhod [Management of Changes in the Socio-Economic and Institutional Environment of the Region. Project Approach]. Voronezh : Voronezh State Pedagogical Univ. Pub., 194 р. (In Russ.).
11. Treshchevskiy, D.Yu., Papin, S.N., Penina, E.O. (2019). [Innovation Risks in the Region – Expert Analysis]. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research. Vol. 85. 2nd International Conference on Economy, Management and Entrepreneurship (ICOEME 2019). Atlantis Press, pp. 311-315.
12. Endovitsky, D.A., Tabachnikova, M.B., Treshchevsky, Yu.I. (2017). Analysis of the Economic Optimism of the Institutional Groups and Socio-Economic Systems. ASERS. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics. Vol. VII, issue 6 (28), pp. 1745-1752, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14505/jarle
13. Risin, I.E., Treshchevsky, Yu.I., Tabachnikova, M.B., Franovskaya, G.N. (2017). Public Authorities and Business on the Possibilities of Region’s Development. In: Popkova, E. (Ed). Overcoming Uncertainty of Institutional Environment as a Tool of Global Crisis Management. Contributions to Economics. Springer, Cham. P. 55-62, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60696-5_8
14. Treshchevsky, Yu.I., Voronin, V.P., Tabachnikova, M.B., Franovskaya, G.N. (2019). Economic and Statistical Analysis in Evaluating the Perspectives of Structural Changes of Regions’ Economy. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Springer International Publishing AG. Cham, Switzerland, pp. 521-529, doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75383-6
15. Konysheva, L.K., Nazarov, D.M. (2011). Osnovy teorii nechetkikh mnozhestv : uchebnoe posobie [Fundamentals of Fuzzy Sets Theory : Tutorial]. St.-Petersburg : Peter Publ., 2011. 192 р. ISBN: 978-5-459-00735-0