PECULIARITIES OF UNIVERSITY PARTNERSHIP NETWORKS PRESENTATIONS
Abstract
The article tests out the criteria for comparing data on activity of partnership networks of higher education institutions presented on their websites. The authors give a comparative analysis of self-presentations provided by the three world's top universities - Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge University and Imperial College London. Considerable attention is focused on peculiarities of presentation of network partners, interactions with and between partners, and also prospects for development of partnership networks. The proposed criteria have proved effective in identifying common features and differences in the way higher education institutions supply information about their partnership networks.
About the Authors
Semen E. Il'in
Novosibirsk State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ekaterina V. Filatova
Novosibirsk State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Nikolaeva, A.D., Alekseeva, I.S. (2014). [SelfExamination as a Key Direction of the State Accreditation of Higher Education Institution]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya [Modern Problems of Science and Education]. No. 6. Available at: www.scienceeducation.ru/12016686 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
2. Shkrebko, A.N., Ivanova, I.V. (2014). [System Approach to Internal Quality Education Control]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 89, pp. 98106. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
3. Bol’shova, N.N., Kharkevich, M.V. (2013). [University Competitiveness on the Internet]. Vestnik MGIMOUniversiteta [MGIMO University Science Journal]. No. 2, pp. 277279. (In Russ.)
4. Zayakina, R.A., Il’in, S.E. (2015). [Peculiarities of Universities’ SelfPresentations Oriented Toward Actual and Potential Network Partners (A Case Study of Novosibirsk Universities)]. Nauka o cheloveke: gumanitarnye issledovaniya [The Science Journal About the Person: Researches in the Humanities]. No. 1(19), pp. 8795. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
5. Karpenko, O.M., Bershadskaya, M.D. (2014). [WEBOMETRICS International University Ranking: Dynamics of Webactivity of Russian Higher Education Institutions (2007–2013)]. In: Sheregi, F.E., Aref’ev, A.L. (Eds.) Izmerenie reitingov universitetov: mezhdunarodnyi i rossiiskii opyt [University Rankings: International and Russian Experience]. Moscow: Centre for Sociological Survey Publ., 504 p.
6. Il’in, S.E. (2015). [Criteria for Comparing SelfPresentations of Higher Education Institutions from Network Perspective]. Global’nyi nauchnyi potentsial [Global Scientific Potential]. No. 9(54), pp. 2428. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
7. Fedorov, M.V., Peshina, E.V., Gredina, O.V., Avdeev, P.A. (2012). [Pentahelix as a Concept of Knowledge Production in Innovative Economy]. Upravlenets [Journal of a Manager]. No. 3 4(3132), pp. 412. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
Review
Views:
256
Email this article 