APPLICATION OF THE CDIO APPROACH TO THREE LEVEL ENGINEERING PROGRAMS DESIGN
Abstract
Some results of an analysis and evaluation of the CDIO Syllabus topicality for the level engineering programs (BEng, MSc and PhD) design are presented. The analysis is based on a comparison of the CDIO Syllabus v2 intended learning outcomes with the requirements to preparation of the various engineering program graduates to complex, innovative and research activities. The requirements are defined taking into consideration the Russian Federal State Educational Standards and the Association for Engineering Education of Russia criteria, harmonized with the international standards. The results of an examination of the CDIO Syllabus v2 made by trainees of the Russian CDIO Academy are used.
References
1. Rethinking Engineering Education, the CDIO Approach, Second Edition / E. Crawley, J. Malmqvist, S. Ostlund, D. Brodeur, K. Edström. Springer, 2014. 311 p.
2. IEA Graduate Attributes and Professional Competencies. Available at: http://www.ieagreements.org/IEALGradLAttrLProfLCompetencies.pdf (accessed: 05.02.2016).
3. Criteria and Procedures of Professional Accreditation of Engineering Programs. The AEER Accreditation Center. Available at: http://www.acLraee.ru (accessed 05.02.2016). (In Russ.).
4. EURACE Framework Standards and Guidelines. European Network for Accreditation of Engineering Education. Available at: http:// www.enaee.eu/eurLaceLsystem/eurLaceLframeworkLstandards (accessed 05.02.2016).
5. Byrne, J., Jorgensen, T., Loukkola, T. Quality Assurance in Doctoral Education – Results of the ARDE Project. EUA Publications, 2013. 58 p.
6. Chuchalin, A. (2011) [Modernization of Engineering Bachelor Programs Taking into Account International Engineering Education Standards]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 10, pp. 20–29. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
7. Crawley, E., Edstrom, K., Stanko, T. Educating Engineers for ResearchLbased InnovationLcreating the Learning Outcomes Framework. Proc. 9th Intern. CDIO Conf. Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, 2013, June 9–13.
8. Crawley, E.F., Lucas, W.A., Malmqvist, J., & Brodeur, D.R. “The CDIO Syllabus v2.0: An Update Statement of Goals for Engineering Education.” Proc. 7th Int. CDIO Conf. Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, 2011. June 20–23.
9. Chuchalin, A., Myagkov, M., Tayurskaya, M. (2014) [Continuing Professional Development of Instructors in the Application of International CDIO Standards]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 6, pp. 58L67. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
Review
Views:
498
Email this article 