Preview

Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia

Advanced search

The University as a Being-historical Object: the Experience of M. Heidegger

https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-7-157-166

Abstract

The article is based on the historical and philosophical analysis of fragments of Martin Heidegger’s concept called “Seinsgeschichte”, in which the philosopher considered the phenomenon of the university and the current situation of sciences. Their condition, accord- ing to the philosopher, is a direct consequence of the comprehensive extinction of the tradi- tion of European thinking, originating in the era of Platonism. The main signs of the era of the “decline of metaphysics” are the primacy of form over content, the “factory” production of university personnel and products of scientific activity, the rejection of comprehension as an urgent necessity and the total domination of the utilitarian approach to knowledge. Heidegger has no formed positive project to overcome the current state of affairs. Firstly, because he had an unsuccessful experience of rectorship, including a fruitless attempt to put into practice his philosophical ideas, to which part of this article is devoted. Secondly, since the rejection of uni- versal methods, ready-made answers and unshakable truths becomes an integral part of his late philosophy, since they lull thinking and lead a person away from fruitful doubt. A deep analysis of the origins of the crisis of the European University allows us to take a different look at the side effects of industrialization and digitalization of modern society and outline possible ways to resolve it in the future.

About the Author

M. B. Mitlyanskaya
Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Master of Philosophy, doctoral student, Department of History of Foreign Philosophy of MSU



References

1. Mitlyanskaya, M. B. (2019). Understanding of truth in M. Heidegger’s Seynsgeschichte. Finikoviy Compot = Date Compote. No. 14, pp. 116-124, doi: 10.24411/2587-9308-2019-00017 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

2. Nietzsche, F. (1990). Essays in 2 vols. Vol. 2. / Comp., ed. and author’s note to A. Svasyan; Trans. from German. Moscow: Thought, 831 p. ISBN: 5-244-00173-6. (In Russ.).

3. Letunovsky, V.V. (2002). Comparative Analysis of Methodological Bases of Existential Analysis Options by L. Binswanger and M. Boss. Understanding as a Factor of Personal Development. Kemerovo: Graphics. Available at: http://hpsy.ru/public/x026.htm (accessed 12.06.2023). (In Russ.).

4. Mitlyanskaya, M.B. (2020). Martin Heidegger’s Rectorship: Historical and Philosophical Analysis. Idei i idealy = Ideas and Ideals. Vol. 12, no. 3, part 1, pp. 121–133, doi: 10.17212/20750862-2020-12.3.1-121-133 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

5. Ryklin, M. (2001). Metamorphoses of the Great Dwarfs / Heidegger M., Jaspers K. Correspondence 1920-1963, Moscow: Ad Marginem, 416 p. ISBN: 5-93321-022-6. (In Russ.).

6. Heidegger, M. (2016). Reflections II-VI (Black Notebooks 1931-1938). Vol. 1. Moscow: Publishing House of the Gaidar Institute, 584 p. ISBN: 978-5-93255-465-4. (In Russ.).

7. Mironov, V.V., Mironova, D.V. (2016). The Philosopher and Power: the Heidegger case. Voprosy Filosofii = Questions of Philosophy. No. 7, pp. 21-38. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_26421776_48861062.pdf (accessed 12.06.2023). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

8. Cotten, J.P. (2006). Heidegger and Politics. Filosofiya i obchestvo = Philosophy and Society. No. 4 (45), pp. 164-175. (In Russ.).

9. Heidegger, M. (2014). Gesamtausgabe. Bd. 94: Überlegungen II-VI (Schwarze Hefte 1931-1938). Fr. a/M.: Vittorio Klostermann, 536 s. ISBN: 3465038150. (In Germ.)

10. Heidegger, M. (1993). Time and Being: Articles and Speeches. Moscow: Respublica, 447 p. ISBN: 5250014968. (In Russ.).

11. Safransky, R. (2005). Heidegger: The German Master and His Time. Moscow: Molodaya gvardiya, 614 p. ISBN: 5-235-02849-Х. (In Russ.).

12. Heidegger, М. (1989). Gesamtausgabe. Bd. 65: Beiträge zur Philosophie (vom Ereignis). Fr. a/M.: Vittorio Klostermann, 513 s. ISBN: 3465018605. (In Germ.)

13. Zha, B. (2022). What Science Cannot Do: The Question Concerning Science and Heidegger. Open Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 69-85, doi: 10.4236/ojpp.2022.121005


Review

Views: 556


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0869-3617 (Print)
ISSN 2072-0459 (Online)