Postdocs in Russia: Peculiarities of Employment and Incentives

The article presents the results of the author’s research aimed at identifying the peculiarities of employment of postdocs, a relatively new labor category for the Russian academic labor market. Due to several difficulties associated with forming a sample of postdocs (difficulty in identifying key persons responsible for the development of postdoctoral programs; direct, but not always justified, refusals to provide data, difficulties in identifying potential respondents due to their occupation of various scientific positions in Russian universities), the “snowball” method was used. As a result, the empirical basis of the study was formed based on the results of an online survey of 44 postdocs. As part of the study, tasks related to compiling a socio-economic portrait of a postdoc based on economic, socio-demographic characteristics and indicators of research efficiency, identifying the characteristics of the employment and placement experience of postdocs, objective factors and individual motives for making decisions in the field of choosing postdoctoral programs were solved, as well as diagnostics of tools and channels for young researchers to search for vacancies. The authors distinguish between types of academic mobility (educational and labor) and consider postdoctoral studies as a promising form of external labor academic mobility aimed at attracting and retaining high-potential young researchers planning a long-term career in the academic labor market.

Shifting the emphasis from the inbreeding model of university development (internal labor mobility) to the model of external labor academic mobility of young specialists allows those universities that can effectively manage the flow of academic human capital to receive additional socio-economic preferences and return on investment. There are very few similar empirical studies that analyze the features of the development of postdoctoral institutions in Russia and abroad and are based on quantitative and qualitative data from surveys of direct participants in external labor academic mobility – postdocs, which determines the scientific novelty and practical value of the proposed results.

1. Vlasova, V., Gokhberg, L., Ditkovsky K. et al. (2023). Russian Science in Numbers: 2023. Moscow: Higher School of Economics. Pp. 1-48. DOI: 10.17323/978-5-7598-2768-9 (In Russ.).

2. Morano-Foadi, S. (2005). Scientific Mobility, Career Progression, and Excellence in the European Research Area. International migration. Vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 133-162, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2435.2005.00344.x

3. Balter, M. (1999). Europeans Who Do Postdocs Abroad Face Re-Entry Problems. Science. Vol. 285, no. 5433, pp. 1449-1536. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2898057 (accessed 23.06.2023).

4. Nefedova, A., Volkova, G., Dyachenko, E., Kotsemir, M., Spirina, M. (2021). International Mobility and Publication Activity of Early-Career-Researchers: What Do Statistics, Bibliometrics and Scientists Themselves Say? Journal of the New Economic Association. Vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 98-121, doi: 10.31737/2221-2264-2021-524-4 (In Russ.).

5. Volkova, G., Nikishin, E. (2019). Interregional Mobility of Russian Researchers: Moving For A Promising Job. Higher School of Economics Research Paper. No. WP BRP 103/STI/2019, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3486105

6. Moed, H.F., Halevi, G. (2014). A Bibliometric Approach to Tracking International Scientific Migration. Scientometrics. Vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 1987-2001, doi: 10.1007/s1119 2-014-1307-6

7. Trippl, M. (2013). Scientific Mobility and Knowledge Transfer at the Interregional and Intraregional Level. Regional Studies. Vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 1653-1667, doi: 10.1080/00343404.2010.549119

8. Fernandez-Zubieta, A., Geuna, A., Lawson, C. (2015). What Do We Know of the Mobility of Research Scientists and of its Impact on Scientific Production. SSRN Electronic Journal. P. 1-33, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2611203

9. Selmer, J., Lauring, J. (2013). Cognitive and Affective Reasons to Expatriate and Work Adjustment of Expatriate Academics. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management. Vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 175-191, doi: 10.1177/1470595813485382

10. Lee, J.T., Kuzhabekova, A. (2018). Reverse Flow in Academic Mobility from Core to Periphery: Motivations of International Faculty Working in Kazakhstan. Higher Education. Vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 369-386, doi: 10.1007/s10734-017-0213-2

11. Musselin, C. (2004). Towards a European Academic Labour Market? Some Lessons Drawn from Empirical Studies on Academic Mobility. Higher Education. Vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 55-78, doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2127-3

12. Shmatko, N., Markova, Y., Katchanov, Y. (2016). Synchronous International Scientific Mobility In The Space Of Affiliations: Evidence From Russia. Springer Plus. Vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-19, doi:10.1186/s40064-016-2127-3

13. Mendoza, C., Staniscia, B., Ortiz, A. (2020). “Knowledge Migrants” or “Economic Migrants”? Patterns of Academic Mobility and Migration from Southern Europe to Mexico. Population, Space and Place. Vol. 26, no. 2. doi: 10.1002/psp.2282

14. Ackers, L. (2005). Moving People and Knowledge: Scientific Mobility in the European Union. International Migration. Vol. 43, no. 5. pp. 99-131, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2435.2005.00343.x

15. Murakami, Y. (2014). Influences of Return Migration on International Collaborative Research Networks: Cases of Japanese Scientists Returning from the US. The Journal of Technology Transfer. Vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 616-634, doi: 10.1007/s10961-013-9316-9

16. Baruffaldi, S., Landoni, P. (2012). Return Mobility and Scientific Productivity of Researchers Working Abroad: The Role of Home Country Linkages. Research Policy. Vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 1655-1665, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.005

17. De Filippo, D., Casado, E.S., Gуmez, I. (2009). Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches to the Study of Mobility and Scientific Performance: A Case Study of a Spanish University. Research Evaluation. Vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 191-200, doi: 10.3152/095820209X451032

18. Jöns, H. (2007). Transnational Mobility and the Spaces of Knowledge Production: A Comparison of Global Patterns, Motivations and Collaborations in Different Academic Fields. Social Geography. Vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 97-114, doi: 10.5194/sg-2-97-2007

19. Mahroum, S. (2000). Scientific mobility. An Agent of Scientific Expansion and Institutional Empowerment. Science Communication. Vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 367-378, doi: 10.1177/1075547000021004003

20. Chepurenko, A. (2015). The Role of Foreign Scientific Foundations’ Role in the Cross-border Mobility of Russian Academics. International Journal of Manpower. Vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 562-584, doi: 10.1108/IJM11-2013-0256

21. Saint-Blancat C. (2018). Making Sense of Scientific Mobility: How Italian Scientists Look Back on Their Trajectories of Mobility in the EU. Higher Education Policy. Vol. 31, no. 1. pp. 37-54, doi: 10.1057/s41307017-0042-z

22. Payumo, J.G., Lan, G., Arasu, P. (2018). Researcher Mobility at a US Research-Intensive University: Implications for Research and Internationalization Strategies. Research Evaluation. Vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 28-35, doi: 10.1093/resev al/rvx038

23. Van Bouwel, L.A.C. (2010). International Mobility Patterns of Researchers and Their Determinants. Paper presented at the Opening Up Innovation: Strategy, Organization and Technology, London, UK, 2010, June. P. 16–18.

24. Jonkers K., Tijssen R. (2008). Chinese Researchers Returning Home: Impacts of International Mobility on Research Collaboration and Scientific Productivity. Scientometrics. Vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 309-333, doi: 10.1007/s11192-007-1971-x

25. Deville P., Wang D., Sinatra R., Song C., Blondel V.D., Barabási A.-L. (2014). Career on the Move: Geography, Stratification, and Scientific Impact. Scientific Reports. Vol. 4, no. 4770, doi: 10.1038/srep04770

26. Cruz-Castro L., Sanz-Menéndez L. (2010). Mobility versus Job Stability: Assessing Tenure and Productivity Outcomes. Research Policy. Vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 27-38, doi: 10.1016/J.RESPOL.2009.11.008

27. Horta, H. (2013). Deepening Our Understanding of Academic Inbreeding Effects on Research Information Exchange and Scientific Output: New Insights for Academic Based Research. Higher Education. Vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 487-510, doi: 10.1007/s10734-012-9559-7

28. Sivak, E., Yudkevich, M. (2012). University Inbreeding: An Impact on Values, Strategies and Individual Productivity of Faculty Members. SSRN Electronic Journal. Doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1996417

29. Lovakov, A., Yudkevich, M., Alipova, O. (2019). Inbereds and Non-Inbreds among Russian Academics: Short-Term Similarity and Long-Term Differences in Productivity. Higher Education Quarterly. Vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 445-455, doi: 10.1111/hequ.12226

30. Bäker A. (2015). Non-Tenured Post-Doctoral Researchers’ Job Mobility and Research Output: An Analysis of the Role of Research Discipline, Department Size, and Coauthors. Research Policy. Vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 634-650, doi: 10.15496/publikation-6408

31. Brechelmacher, A., Park, E., Ates, G., Campbell, D.F.J. (2015). The Rocky Road to Tenure – Career Paths in Academia. In: Fumasoli, T., Goastellec, G., Kehm, B. (eds) Academic Work and Careers in Europe: Trends, Challenges, Perspectives. The Changing Academy – The Changing Academic Profession in International Comparative Perspective. Springer, Cham. Vol. 12, pp. 13-40, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-10720-2_2

32. Yudkevich M., Altbach P.G., Rumbley L.E. (eds). (2015). Academic Inbreeding and Mobility in Higher Education Global Perspectives. Palgrave Studies in Global Higher Education (PSGHE). Pp. 1-16. ISBN-10: 1137461241, ISBN-13: 978-1137461247.

33. Slepykh, V., Lovakov, A., Yudkevich, M. (2022). Research Career after Thesis Defence: The Case of Four Fields of Study in Russia. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. No. 4, pp. 260-297, doi: 10.17323/1814-9545-2022-4-260-297

34. Alipova, O., Lovakov, A. (2018). Academic Inbreeding and Publication Activities of Russian Faculty. Tertiary Education and Management. Vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 66-82, doi: 10.1080/13583883.2017.1395905

35. Aghion P., Dewatripont M., Hoxby C., Mas-Colell A., Sapir A. (2008). Higher Aspirations: An Agenda for Reforming European Universities. Bruegel: IPM S.A. 59 p. ISBN: 978-9-078910-07-7. Available at: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bre:bluprt:1 (accessed 05.06.2023).

36. Dezhina, I. (2016). Intersectotal Mobility of Researchers in Russiaand the World. Bulletin of the Russian Foundation for Humanities. Vol. 1, no. 82, pp. 96-110 Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_26126275_44190499.pdf (accessed 23.06.2023). (In Russ.).

37. Dyachenko, E.L., Nefedova, A.I., Streltsova, E.A. (2017). Recruitment of Foreign Scientists in Russian Research Organizations and Universities: Opportunities and Barriers. University Management: Practice and Analysis. Vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 132-143, doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2478-8 (In Russ.).

38. Netrebin, Yu. (2019). Foreign Experience of Postdoctoral Training of Researchers. Management of Science and Scientometrics. Vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 204-223, doi: 10.33873/2686-6706.2019.14-2.204-223