The Technical University Teacher: What Do Students Value?
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-11-60-76
Abstract
At present, according to Presidential Address to the Federal Assembly our country has set the task of reforming higher education based on the synthesis of the best practices of the Soviet educational system and the experience of recent decades. This increases the responsibility of technical university teachers, whose competencies have been determined in recent years on the basis of different scientific approaches. In this regard, the problem of identifying the teachers’ qualities that are significant for students is becoming especially relevant.
In order to solve the problem, the research of students’ essays obtained as a result of the International Essay Contest in English “My University Engineering Teacher I will Never Forget” was undertaken. The contest was organized by Moscow Automobile and Road Construction State Technical University (MADI) in 2021-22. The hypothesis of the research suggested that the personality traits of the technical university teacher are valued by students not lower than their professional competencies.
In order to achieve the goal and verify the hypothesis, four tasks were set and solved during the research: the students’ opinions on the role of the teacher were revealed; the professional competencies of the teacher that are significant for students were determined; the personality traits of the teacher that are significant for students were determined; the significance of the teacher’s professional competencies and personality traits for students was compared. The research methodology provided for qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the students’ essays including their content analysis.
The paper describes the main results of the research, which confirmed the hypothesis, as well as their interpretation. The interpretation of the research results allowed us to draw general conclusions concerning reforming the modern system of engineering education. The main conclusion concerns the necessity of returning engineering education to the traditional for the Soviet higher school integration of education and upbringing and the significance of developing in the educational process not only the competencies relevant for employers, but also the personality of future specialists.
Keywords
About the Author
T. Yu. PolyakovaRussian Federation
Tatiana Yu. Polyakova – Dr. Sci. (Pedagogy), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Foreign Languages
64 Leningradskiy ave., Moscow, 125319
References
1. Сhuchalin, A.I. (2017). Preparation of PhD Students for Pedagogical Activity in Higher Education]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 8/9 (215), pp. 5-21. Available at: https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1132/985 (accessed 10.09.2023). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
2. Shageeva, F.T., Mishchenko, E.S., Chernyshov, N.G., Nurgalieva, K.E., Turekhanova, K.M., Omirzhanov, E.T. (2020). International ENTER Project: A New Pedagogical Training Approach for Engineering Educators. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 65-74, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2020-6-65-74 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
3. Minin, M.G., Belomestnova, E.N., Benson, G.F., Pakanova, V.S. (2014). Lectureres’ Pedagogical Training at Engineering University. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 4, pp. 20- 29. Available at: https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/618/539 (accessed 10.09.2023). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
4. Gazieva, I.A., Burashnikova, A.A. (2023). Competency Functional Profile of the University Teacher: Value Approach. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 26-47, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-3-26-47 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
5. Polyakova, T.Yu., Prikhodko, V.M. (2022). Technical University Teacher Competences in Russia and Abroad. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 61-78, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2022-31-6-61-78 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
6. Shlikova, N.L. (1998). Vospriyatie prepodavatelya studentami [Studetns’ Perception of the Teacher]. Dis. Kand. In Psychology. 132 p.
7. Semenov, O.A., Nikolaev, E.V., Semenova, G.E. (2020) Issledovanie obraza sovremennogo prepodavatelya sredi studentov vuza [Modern Teacher Survey Among University Students]. Sovremennie problem nauki i obrazovaniya = Modern problems of science and education. No. 1, doi: 10.17513/spno.29517
8. Gavronskaya, T.V., Shadrina, E.M. (2016). Imidge prepodavatelya vuza glazami studentov [University Teacher Image with Students’ Eyes]. Mejdunarodniy jurnal prikladnikh I fundamentalnikh issledovaniy = International journal of applied and fundamental studies. No. 4-1, pp. 25-28. Available at: https://applied-research.ru/ru/article/view?id=8782 (accessed 10.09.2023).
9. Agranova, А.О. (2016). Obraz prepodavatelya glazami studentov v svyazi s samootsenkoy I urovnem prityazaniy obuchayuschichcya [Teacher’s Image with Students’ Eyes Related to Learners’ Self-Assessment and Claim Level]. Evraziyskiy soyuz uchenikh = Eurasian union of scientists. Pedagogical sciences. No. 4 (25). Available at: https://euroasia-science.ru/pedagogicheskie-nauki/образ-преподавателя-глазами-студент/ (accessed 23.04.2023).
10. Gritsanov. А.А., Abushenko, V.L., Evelkin, G.M., Sokolova, G.N., Tereschenko, O.V. (2003). Sociology: Encyclopedia. Minsk, Interpresservis, Knijniy Dom. 1312 p. ISBN: 985-428-619-3.
11. Pashinyan, I.A. (2012). Content Analysis as a Method of Research: Advantages and Limitations. Nauchnaya periodika: problem i resheniya = Scientific periodicals: problems and solusions. No. 3 (9), May-June, doi: 10.18334/np2355
12. Vershilovskiy, S.G., Matushkina, M.D. (2006). Kontent-analiz v pedagogicheskov issledovanii. Uchebnoye posobie. Shkola molodogo issledovatelya [Content analysis in pedagogical research. Manual. Young researcher school]. Saint-Petersburg. Available at: https://fileskachat.com/view/93013_3b40d7783c34ff801b95e941b49a1b31.html (accessed 10.09.2023).
13. Tkacheva, Т.М. (2015). Rol’ lichnosti prepodavatelya v obespechenii kachestva professionalnoy podgotovki vipusnikov vuza. [The Role of the Teacher’s Personality in the Quality of Professional Training of University Graduates]. Manual. Moscow. MADI. 76 p. ISBN: 978-5-7962-0186-2.
14. Pereligina, E.V. (2002). Psihologiya imidga [Image Psycology]. Moscow. AspektPress. 223 p. ISBN: 5-7567-0265-2.
15. Danilova, A.G, Mitina, O.V. (2021). Computerized Qualitative Text Analysis. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya = Moscow University Psychology Bulletin. Series 14. Psycology. No. 1, pp. 220-240, doi: 10.11621/vsp.2021.01.091
16. Polyakova, T. (2023). New Generation of Engineering Students: Do We Know How to Teach Them? In: Auer, M.E., Pachatz, W., Rüütmann, T. (eds) Learning in the Age of Digital and Green Transition. ICL 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Springer. Doi: 10.1007/978-3031-26190-9_58