THE CONCEPTION OF POINT-RATING SYSTEM FOR ASSESSMENT OF STUDENTS' EDUCATIONAL RESULTS
Abstract
About the Authors
Marina U. PrakhovaRussian Federation
Svetlana V. Svetlakova
Russian Federation
Nadezhda V. Zaichenko
Russian Federation
Elena A. Khoroshavina
Russian Federation
Andrey N. Krasnov
Russian Federation
References
1. Shehonin, A.A., Tarlykov, V.A. (2011). [Point and Rating System for Assessment of Educational Results]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 6, pp. 22+30. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
2. Sazonov, B.A. (2012). [Grade Point Average System as a Fair Measure for the Estimation of Knowledge and the Quality of Educational Process]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 6, pp. 28+40. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
3. Prasad Anju. Are Examinations the Best Way to Evaluate Students? [Online]. Available at: http://articles.cbseguess.com/continuing+education/are+examinations+the+best+way+to+evaluate+students#sthash.Xxw2B7Qi.dpuf
4. Bachniskaya, O. N. (2013). The Problems of Point+Rating System Realization in Higher School. Discussion. No.7 (37). Available at: http://journal+discussion.ru/en/publication.php?id=80 (In Russ.)
5. Kruzhalin, V.I. (2008). [Ratings and Quality of Education]. Akkreditatsiya v obrazovanii [Accreditation in Education]. No. 4, pp 26+29. (In Russ.)
6. [The Clause of Point+Rating System for Estimation of Quality of Learning Outcomes of the Main Education Programs of State University of Management]. Available at: https://guu.ru/files/norm/2014/brs_guu.pdf (In Russ.)
7. Zvonnikov, V.I., Chelyshkova, M.B. (2007). [Contemporary Ways of Study Results’ Assessment]. Moscow: Publishing center “Academia”, 224 p. (In Russ.)
8. Anisimova, M.A., Blyakherov, I.S., Maslennikov, A.V., Morzhov, A.V. (2013). [To the Question of Designing of Estimation Means for Students’ Professional Competences]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 4, pp. 106+112. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
9. Prakhova, M.Yu., Svetlakova, S.V. (2015). [Point+Rating System of Academic Achievement Assessment is the Key to Success]. Electroprivod, electrotehnologii I electrooborudovanie predpriyatii: sb. nauch. tr. II mezhdunarodnoi (V Vseros.) nauch.!tehn. konf.: Problemi avtomatizacii tehnologicheskih processov dobichi, transporta i pererabotki nefti. [Electro drive, electrotechnics and electrical facility of factories: collection of research papers of 2nd Int. (Fifth All+Russian) Sci+Tech. Conf.: Problems of Automation of Technological Processes of Oil Production, Transport and Refining. Ufa: Ufa State Petroleum Technological University Publ., pp. 85+90. (In Russ.)
10. Rachel Quenemoen, Sandra Thompson, Martha Thurlow. (2013) Measuring Academic Achieve+ ment of Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities: Building Understanding of Alternate Assessment Scoring Criteria. National Center on Educational Outcomes. [Online] Available at: http://www.cehd.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Synthesis50.html
11. Prakhova, M.Yu., Pavlova, Z.Kh. (2014). [Experience of Working Curricula Optimization]. Uchebnyi protses v vuze v sovremennykh usloviyakh: sb. nauch. tr. III nauch.!metod. konf.: Perspektivi vnedreniya innovatzionnih tekhnologyi v uchebnyi protzess [Prospects for the Introduction of Innovative Technologies in Educational Process. 3rd Sci+Tech. Conf.]. Ufa, pp. 4+6. (In Russ.)