Implementation of Individual Educational Trajectories in University

The significance of the study is determined by the fact that education receives a new round in its development. It is specified by modern trends in the digital world economy, which makes special demands on the human capital development, where higher education institutions play a leading role. The education models using individual educational trajectories are considered one of the most promising at the present stage of society formation, as evidenced by the message of the President of the Russian Federation V.V. Putin and the introduction of a number of amendments to the law on education of the Russian Federation.

The purpose of the study presented by the authors is to describe, analyze and summarize pedagogical  experience  of  IET  implementation  in  higher  educational  institutions.  The  authors  chose  general and  scientific  methods  as  a  methodological  basis:  phenomenological,  sociometric  methods  included pedagogical observation, retrospective and statistical analysis and synthesis. Empirical data are based on the survey result of the 1st, 2nd and 3rd years students (n=117). In spite of the fact that individual educational trajectories are a pedagogical phenomenon, the study can be classified as interdisciplinary, it involves such sciences as psychology, philosophy, and sociology. The IET realization has a number of advantages, at the same time IET is not free from some disadvantages. The problems identified in the course of the study in the implementation of IOT can be minimized, taking into account the recommendations proposed by the authors of the article, which will rationalize and humanize the education-al process. The scientific novelty and practical significance lies in the theoretical and practical significance of the conducted research, which helps understand the IET content and essence in pedagogical practice. The generalized empirical experience can serve a basis for the development of special courses, textbooks, teaching materials and recommendations on the organization of IET in higher education.

1. Komensky, Ya.A. (1982). Selected Pedagogical Works. Vol. 2. Moskow: Pedagogika. 576 p. Available at: http://pedagogic.ru/books/item/f00/s00/z0000054/index.shtml?ysclid=lg52jmwcmy705750791 (accessed: 30.03.2023.) (In Russ.).

2. Schleiermacher, F. (2022). Speeches about Religion to Educated People Who Despise It. Monologues. X History LLC; Moscow; 2015. ISBN: 978-5-9906462-8-5. (In Russ.).

3. Bruner, J.S. (1977). The Process of Education. 97 p. Available at: https://mde.biologia.gr/amigi/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2016/03/The-Process-of-Education-Bruner.pdf (accessed: 30.01.2023).

4. Maslow, A. (1999). Motivation and Personality. St. Petersburg: Eurasia. 479 p. Available at: https://cpp-p.ru/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/motiv.pdf?ysclid=lg52l37vky962731116 (accessed: 05.04.2023). (In Russ.).

5. Rogers, K. (2002). Freedom to Learn. Moskow: Sense; 527 p. ISBN: 5-89357-099-5. (In Russ.).

6. Vasilyeva, Z.I., Sedova, N.V. (2021). History of Education and Pedagogical Thought Abroad and in Russia. St. Petersburg; 400 p. Available from: https://readli.net/istoriya-obrazovaniya-i-pedagogicheskoy-myisli-za-rubezhom-i-v-rossii/?ysclid=lg5330bm30546132029 (accessed: 14.02.2023). (In Russ.).

7. Petrovsky, A.V. (2012). The Need to “Be a Person”. Vestnik prakticheskoj psihologii obrazovanija – Bulletin of Practical Psychology of Education. Vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 87-91. Available at: https://psyjournals.ru/vestnik_psyobr/2012/n4/Petrovsky.shtml (accessed: 25.11.2023). (In Russ.).

8. Asmolov, A.G. (2014). Additional Personal Education in the Era of Change: Collaboration, Co-Creation, Self-Creation. Obrazovatel’naja politika = Educational Policy. No. 2 (64). Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_23126487_13475472.pdf (accessed: 25.11.2023). (In Russ.).

9. Mazhar, E.N., Vasilyeva, E.V. (2022). Individualization of Higher Education by Means of the System of Additional Education. Perspektivy nauki = Prospects of science. No. 12 (159), pp. 299-301. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_50378449_83671243.pdf (accessed: 01.25.2024). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

10. Bubnova, Yu.V. (2018). Features of Designing Individual Trajectories of Studentsof Non-Linguistic Directions of Universities. Nauka i shkola = Science and School. No. 4, pp. 184-188. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_35653124_15292336.pdf (accessed: 18.03.2023). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

11. Kabanova, L.A., Shkunova, A.A. (2018). Designing Individual Educational Trajectories in Higher Education. Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovanija = Problems of modern pedagogical education. No. 59-3, pp. 339-343. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_35196956_56535012.pdf (accessed: 21.03.2023). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

12. Sysoev, P.V. (2013). Training on Individual Educational Trajectories. Voprosy metodiki prepodavanija v vuze = Questions of teaching methods at the university. No. 2 (16), pp. 13-23. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21300981 (accessed: 21.03.2023). (In Russ.).

13. Bondarevskaya, E.V. (2001). Meanings and Strategies of Personality-Oriented Education. Pedagogika = Pedagogy. No. 1, pp. 17-24 Available at: https://portalus.ru/modules/shkola/rus_readme.php?subaction=showfull&id=1191932059&archive=1196815450&start_from=&ucat=&&ysclid=lg533shdqw151286491 (accessed: 14.02.2023). (In Russ.).

14. Yakimanskaya, I.S. (1995). Development of Technology of Personality-Oriented Learning. Voprosy psihologii = Questions of Psychology. No. 2, pp. 31-42. Available at: https://koi.tspu.ru/koi_books/nikolskaya2/rtloo.htm (accessed: 25.11.2023). (In Russ.).

15. Koli, H., Kylämä, M. (2000). Oppilaitoksen tietoja viestint ätekniikan opetusk äyt ön strategiaty övälineitä kehitt ämistyöhön. Opetushallitus. Networking in Finnish Schools 1996-1999. National Board of Education. Available at: https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/8743/ (accessed: 12.02.2023).

16. Koschmann, T., Kelson, T.A., Feltovich, F.I. (1996). Computer-supported Problem based Learning: A Principled Approach to the Use of Computer in Collaborative Learning. Lawrence Elbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. Pp. 1-23. Available at: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=9897ad331b1c4004de4632ecb85b6c70de253fc1 (accessed: 12.02.2023).

17. Martinková P., Hladká A., Potu žníková E. (2019). Is Academic Tracking Related to Improving Academic Competence? Using Propensity Score Comparison and Differential Analysis of the Functioning of Element Changes to Better Understand the Effects of Tracking. Conference: ECER. Doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101286

18. Membrive, A., Silva, N., Rocher, M.J., Rubio, I.M. (2023). Promotion of the Conceptualization of Learning Trajectories: A Review of Learning in Different Contexts. Learning, Culture and social Interaction. Vol. 37. Article no. 100658, doi: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2022.100658

19. Cuevas-Vallejo, A., Orozco-Santiago, J., Paz-Rodríguez, S. (2023). A Learning Trajectory for University Students Regarding the Concept of Vector. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior. Vol. 70. Article no. 101044, doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2023.101044

20. Akdeniz, D.G., Arg ün, Z. (2021). Learning Trajectory of a Student with Learning Disabilities for the Concept of Length: A Teaching Experiment. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior. Vol. 64, doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2021.100915

21. Kozhakhmetova, R.N., Kolyeva, N.S. (2022). [Development of an Algorithm for Constructing an Individual Educational Trajectory]. Bulletin of the M. Kozybayev SKU. No. 3 (55), pp. 159-166. (In Kazakh.).

22. Bentley, T., Miller, R. (2004). Personalised learning: creating the ingredients for system and society wide change . IARTV Occasional paper No. 87. Melbourne, Australia: Incorporated Association of Registered Teachers of Victoria. Pp. 157-160. Available at: https://silo.tips/download/personalised-learning-an-overview (accessed: 13.02.2023).

23. Nabizadeh, A.H., Leal, J., Rafsanjani, H., Shah, R. (2020). Learning Path Personalization and Recommendation Methods: A Survey of the State-Of-The-Art. Expert Systems with Applications. Article no. 113596, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113596

24. Brown, A.L. (1997). Transforming Schools into Communities of Thinking and Learning about Serious Matters. American Psychologyst . Pp. 399-413, doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.52.4.399

25. Kirillov, P.N. Koryakina, N.I. (2019). School of Possibilities: Individual Development Trajectories. Obrazovatel’naja politika = Educational Policy. No. 3 (79). Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_43142692_36383340.pdf (accessed: 26.11.2023). (In Russ.).

26. Klyapysheva E. V. (2018). Individual educational route as a means of implementing an individual educational trajectory. Interaktivnaja nauka = Interactive Science. No. 12(34). Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_36605518_77137124.pdf (accessed: 21.03.2023). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

27. Speranskaya, N.I., Yatsevich, O.E. (2016). Self-Projecting an Individual Educational Route of a Student: Myth and Reality. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Orenburg State University . No. 2 (190), pp. 56-61. Available at: http://vestnik.osu.ru/2016_2/10.pdf (accessed: 21.03.2023). (In Russ.).

28. Omelaenko, N.V. (2022). Teaching Students on the Basis of an Individual Educational Trajectory. Gumanitarnye i social’nye nauki = Humanities and Social Sciences. No. 1, pp. 178-182. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_48168831_67529580.pdf (accessed: 21.03.2023). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

29. Zeer, E.F., Simanyuk, E.E. (2014). Individual Educational Trajectory in the System of Continuing Education. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii = Pedagogical educationin Russia. No. 3, pp. 74-82. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_21805090_85310952.pdf (accessed: 16.05.2023). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

30. Arzhanik, M.B. (2022). Analysis of the Practices of Individualization of Training in Educational Programs of Medical Education in the Russian Federation and Abroad . Tomsk: SibSMU Publishing House, 46 p. Available at: https://medinrus.ru/upload/iblock/62c/ybm1z211mz085m-wzxs76u0f2ovlt2pce.pdf (accessed: 10.05.2023). (In Russ.).

31. Manukhin, A.A., Volodina, N.N. (2015). Humanities at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (mit). Gumanitarnyj vestni = Humanitarian Bulletin. No. 5 (31), pp. 1-7, doi: 10.18698/2306-8477-2015-5-244 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

32. Pogodaeva, T.V., Volosnikova, L.M., Ogorodnova, O.V. (2019). Individual Educational Trajectories as a Factor of Increasing the Competitiveness of Youth. In: Strategies and practices for the development of inclusive culture in the region. Materials of the forum with international participation. Pp. 214-220. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_39225454_58627908.pdf (accessed: 21.03.2023). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

33. Graf, S. (2005). Improving the Adaptability of E-Learning Platforms: A Meta-Model Supporting Adaptive Courses. In: Conference “Cognition and Research Learning in the Digital Age” . CELDA. December 14-16. Porto, Portugal, Materials. Pp. 440-443. Available at: https://sgraf.athabascau.ca/publications/graf_CELDA05.pdf (accessed: 21.03.2023).

34. Zakharova, I.G., Vorobyova, M.S., Bagnyuk, Yu.V. (2022). Support of Individual Educational Trajectories Based on the Concept of Explicable Artificial Intelligence. Obrazovanie i nauka = Education and Science. Vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 163-190, doi: 10.17853/1994-5639-2022-1-163-190 (In Russ.).