“Social Elevator”: Research of Affirmative Action Program
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-10-83-103
Abstract
This work investigates the academic performance of students enrolled in the “Social Elevator” program at Higher School of Economics (HSE University), which operates under the principle of affirmative action and aims to assist those students who have lower chances of admission due to various social reasons in a highly competitive environment. Objective admissions in Russian universities and the high selectivity of the HSE University, discussed in this paper, do not confidently allow the application of conclusions from foreign studies to the Russian experience. The program had not been previously researched. It was assumed that students of the program would show higher performance than their peers admitted on a general basis – this assumption follows from qualitative research that found that students of this program possess a progressive narrative of overcoming inequality. Regression with dummy variables based on administrative data on student performance and survey data on the socio-economic status of students are used for the analysis. According to the regression analysis results, all else being equal, students of the “Social Elevator” program demonstrate lower performance than students admitted on budgetary places on general grounds, although they average grades at the “good” level and therefore have a chance to get a return to education and overcome inequality. Further research on the topic is required to separate the secondary effects of inequality, as well as to assess the actual social mobility of students participating in the program. The results can be useful in designing educational policy in the field of expanding access to higher education.
Supporting agencies: The study was carried out within the framework of HSE Fundamental Research Program
About the Author
E. A. Tarasova
Russian Federation HSE University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena A. Tarasova, Research Intern
National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE); Center for Sociology of Higher Education
101000; 16 Potapovsky lane, bldg. 10; Moscow
Researcher ID: KSM-3697-2024
References
1. Bessudnov, A.R. (2016). [Socio-Economic and Gender Inequalities in Educational Trajectories upon Completion of Lower Secondary Education in Russia]. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies. No. 1, pp. 135-167, doi: 10.17323/1814-9545-2016-1-135-167 (In Russ.).
2. Prakhov, I.A. (2015). [Barriers Limiting Access to Quality Higher Education in the Context of the USE: Family and School as Constraining Factors]. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies. No. 1, pp. 88-117, doi: 10.17323/1814-9545-2015-1-88-117 (In Russ.).
3. Malinovskiy, S.S., Shibanova, E.Y. (2020). [Regional Differentiation of Accessibility of Higher Education in Russia]. Vol. 13, no. 43. Sovremennaya analitika obrazovaniya [Modern Education Analytics]. Мoscow: HSE. Availiable at: https://ioe.hse.ru/pubs/share/direct/439986100.pdf (accessed: 08. 07. 2024). (In Russ.).
4. Malinovskiy, S.S., Shibanova, E.Y. (2022). [Accessibility of Higher Education in Russia: How to Turn Expansion into Equality.] Vol. 7, no. 67. Sovremennaya analitika obrazovaniya [Modern Education Analytics]. Мoscow: HSE. Availiable at: https://publications.hse.ru/pubs/share/direct/810799588.pdf (accessed: 08. 07. 2024) (In Russ.).
5. Malinovskiy, S.S., Shibanova, E.Y. (2023). [Barriers to Accessibility of Higher Education and Social Factors of Differentiation of Educational Trajectories]. Vol. 8, no. 50. Informacionnyj byulleten’ “Monitoring ekonomiki obrazovaniya” = Bulletin of Monitoring of Education Markets and Organizations. Мoscow: HSE. Availiable at: https://www.hse.ru/data/2023/04/21/2029995470/ib_8(50)_2023.pdf (accessed: 08. 07. 2024). (In Russ.).
6. Malinovskiy, S.S., Shibanova, E.Y. (2022). [The Reasons and Drivers behind Higher Education Ceasing to Expand in Russia]. Sotciologicheskiy zhurnal = Sociological Journal. Vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 8-37, doi: 10.19181/socjour.2022.28.3.9149 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
7. Rozhkova, K.V., Roshchin, S.Yu., Solncev, S.A., Travkin, P.V. (2021). [The Return to Master’s Degree in the Russian Labor Market]. Voprosy Ekonomiki [Economic Studies]. № 8, pp. 69-92, doi: 10.32609/0042-8736-2021-8-69-92 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
8. Melianova, E., Parandekar, S., Patrinos, H., Volgin, A. (2021). Returns to Education in the Russian Federation. Vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 403-422, doi: 10.17323/1813-8691-2021-25-3-403-422
9. Kapel’ushnikov, R.I. (2021). [Returns to Education in Russia: Nowhere Below?]. Voprosy Ekonomiki [Economic Studies]. № 8, pp. 37-68, doi: 10.32609/0042-8736-2021-8-37-68 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
10. Chirkina, T.A., Gusejnova, A.G. (2021). [Social Differentiation of Educational Plans for Admission to Universities]. Informacionnyj byulleten’ “Monitoring ekonomiki obrazovaniya” = Bulletin of Monitoring of Education Markets and Organizations. No. 12. Availiable at: https://www.hse.ru/data/2021/12/23/1776895585/ib_12_2021.pdf (accessed: 08. 07. 2024) (In Russ.).
11. Arcidiacono, P., Lovenheim, M., Zhu, M. (2015). Affirmative Action in Undergraduate Education. Annual Review of Economics. Vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 487-518, doi: 10.1146/annurev-economics-080614-115445
12. Herbaut, E., Geven, K. (2020). What Works to Reduce Inequalities in Higher Education? A Systematic Review of the (Quasi-) Experimental Literature on Outreach and Financial Aid. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility. Vol. 65, article no. 100442. DOI: 10.1016/j.rssm.2019.100442
13. Prakhov, I.A. (2009). [Overview of the Main School – University Transition Models in Western European Countries and the USA]. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies. No. 2., pp. 108-121. Availiable at: https://publications.hse.ru/pubs/share/folder/gubf2hy4bb/74576073.pdf (accessed: 08. 08. 2024).
14. Bugakova, P.O., Prahov, I.A.(2021). [The Characteristics of the University Admission System and Their Influence on the Accessibility of Higher Education]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis. Vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 37-54, doi: 10.15826/umpa.2021.04.035 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
15. Alon, S., Tienda, M. (2005). Assessing the “Mismatch” Hypothesis: Differences in College Graduation Rates by Institutional Selectivity. Sociology of Education. Vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 294-315, doi: 10.1177/003804070507800402
16. Gruzdev, I.A., Gorbunova, E.V., Frumin, I.D. (2013) [Student Attritionin Russian Universities: Stating the Problem]. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies. No. 2, pp. 067-081. Availiable at: https://publications.hse.ru/pubs/share/folder/vbxlixzpdk/87451572.pdf (accessed: 08. 07. 2024). (In Russ.).
17. Boatman, A., Long, B.T. (2016). Does Financial Aid Impact College Student Engagement? Evidence from the Gates Millennium Scholars Program. Research in Higher Education. Vol. 57, pp. 653-681, doi: 10.1007/s11162-015-9402-y
18. Cappelli, P., Won, S. (2016). How You Pay Affects How You Do: Financial Aid Type and Student Performance in College. National Bureau of Economic Research. Article no. 22604, doi: 10.3386/w22604
19. Pascarella, E.T., Terenzini, P.T. (2005). How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research. Volume 2. Jossey-Bass, An Imprint of Wiley. 848 p. ISBN: 978-0-787-91044-0.
20. Mayhew, M.J., Rockenbach, A.N., Bowman, N.A., Seifert, T.A.D., Wolniak, G.C. et al. (2016). How College Affects Students: 21<sup>st</sup> Century Evidence That Higher Education Works. John Wiley & Sons. Vol. 1. 784 p. ISBN: 978-1-118-46268-3.
21. Tinto, V. (2012). Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition. University of Chicago press. ISBN: 0226804461.
22. Becker, G.S. (2009). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. University of Chicago press. ISBN: 0-226-04119-0.
23. Kurakin, D., Kusimova, T. (2024) [Narrative Structures of “Escape”: Progressive Narrative and Cultural Structures of Upward Mobility at an Elite Russian University]. Laboratorium : Russian Review of Social Research. Pp. 102-140, doi: 10.25285/2078-1938-2023-15-3-102-140 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
24. Kurakin, D. (2020). [Tragedy of Inequality: Dehumanizing “L’Homme Total”]. Sociologicheskoe obozrenie = Russian Sociological Review. Vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 167-231, doi: 10.17323/1728-192x-2020-3-167-231 (In Russ.).
25. Bourdieu, P., Passron, Z.K. (2007). Reproduction: Elements of the Theory of the Education System. Мoscow: Prosveshchenie. 267 p. ISBN: 5-09-014104-5.
26. Bourdieu, P. (1998). [Structure, Habitus, Practice]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii = The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology. Vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 44-59. Availiable at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_17084983_48067300.pdf. (accessed: 08. 08. 2024). (In Russ.).
27. Boudon, R. (1974). Education, Opportunity, and Social Inequality: Changing Prospects in Western Society. 220 p. ISBN: 9780471091059.
28. Khavenson, T.E., Chirkina, T.A. (2019). [Educational Choices for Students after 9<sup>th</sup> and 11<sup>th</sup> Grades: Comparison of Primary and Secondary Effects of the Socio-Economic Status of the Family]. Zhurnal issledovaniy social’noy politiki = The Journal of Social Policy Studies. Vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 539-554, doi: 10.17323/727-0634-2019-17-4-539-554 (In Russ.).
29. Jerrim, J., Chmielewski, A.K., Parker, P. (2015). Socioeconomic Inequality in Access to High-Status Colleges: A Cross-Country Comparison. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, No. 42, pp. 20-32, doi: 10.1016/j.rssm.2015.06.003
30. Simonová, N., Soukup, P. (2015). Impact of Primary and Secondary Social Origin Factors on the Transition to University in the Czech Republic. British Journal of Sociology of Education, Vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 707-728, doi: 10.1080/01425692.2013.854690
31. Sowell, T. (2004). Affirmative Action around the World: An Empirical Study. Yale University Press. 256 p. ISBN: 0300107757.
32. Glazer, N. (1987). Affirmative Discrimination: Ethnic Inequality and Public Policy. Harvard University Press. 248 p. ISBN: 9780674007307.
33. Steele, C.M., Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype Threat and the Intellectual Test Performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 797-811, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797
34. Bowen, W.G., Bok, D. (1998). The Shape of The River: Long-Term Consequences of Considering Race in College and University Admissions. Princeton University Press. 544 p. ISBN: 0691182485.
35. Fischer, M.J., Massey, D.S. (2007). The Effects of Affirmative Action in Higher Education. Social Science Research, Vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 531-549, doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.04.004
36. Velez, E.D. (2013). What Do Stafford Loans Actually Buy You: The Effect of Stafford Loan Access on Community College Students. CALDER Working Paper. No. 94. Availiable at: https://caldercenter.org/sites/default/files/erinWP.pdf (accessed: 08. 07. 2024).
37. Alon, S. (2007). The Influence of Financial Aid in Leveling Group Differences in Graduating From Elite Institutions. Economics of Education Review. Vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 296-311, doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2006.01.003
38. Dynarski, S. (2000). Hope for Whom? Financial Aid for the Middle Class and Its Impact on College Attendance. National tax journal. Vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 629-661, doi: 10.17310/ntj.2000.3S.02
39. Choy, S.P. (2004). Paying for College: Changes Between 1990 and 2000 for Full-Time Dependent Undergraduates. Findings from The Condition of Education. US Department of Education. Availiable at: https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2004/2004075.pdf (accessed: 08. 07. 2024).
40. Kane, T.J. (2003). A Quasi-Experimental Estimate of the Impact of Financial Aid on College-Going. Article no. 9703, doi: 10.3386/w9703
41. Alon, S. (2011). Who Benefits Most From Financial Aid? The Heterogeneous Effect of Need Based Grants on Students’ College Persistence. Social Science Quarterly. Vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 807-829, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00793.x
42. Cohodes, S.R., Goodman, J.S. (2014). Merit Aid, College Quality, and College Completion: Massachusetts’ Adams Scholarship as an In-Kind Subsidy. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics. Vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 251-285, doi: 10.1257/app.6.4.251
43. Kondratjeva, O., Gorbunova, E.V., Hawley, J.D. (2017). Academic Momentum and Undergraduate Student Attrition: Comparative Analysis in US and Russian Universities. Comparative Education Review. Vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 607-633, doi: 10.1086/692608
44. Maloshonok, N.G., Vilkova, K.A. (2022). [Measuring Student Academic Engagement as a Tool for Assessing the Quality of Russian Higher Education].Vol. 7, no. 24. Informacionnyj byulleten’ “Monitoring ekonomiki obrazovaniya” = Bulletin of Monitoring of Education Markets and Organizations. Availiable at: https://www.hse.ru/data/2022/05/31/1870885809/ib_7(24)_2022.pdf (accessed: 08. 07. 2024). (In Russ.).
45. Chernenko, S.E., Romanenko, K.R. (2022). “Doomed to Success”: Promoting School Power, Role of the Family, and Inequality on the Way of the Olympiads Winners to University. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies. No. 3, pp. 213-238, doi: 10.17323/1814-9545-2022-3-213-238
46. Porokhov, I.A., Yudkevich, M.M. (2012). Effect of Family Income on USE Performance and the Choice of University. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies. No. 1, pp. 126-147, doi: 10.17323/1814-9545-2012-1-126-147
47. Collier, P.J., Morgan, D.L. (2008). “Is That Paper Really Due Today?”: Differences in First-Generation and Traditional College Students’ Understandings of Faculty Expectations. Higher Education. No. 55, pp. 425-446, doi: 10.1007/s10734-007-9065-5
48. Davis, J. (2010). The First Generation Student Experience: Implications for Campus Practice, and Strategies for Improving Persistence and Success. Routledge. 214 p., doi: 10.4324/9781003447801
49. Perna, L.W., Thomas, S.L. (2008). Theoretical Perspectives on Student Success: Understanding the Contributions of the Disciplines. ASHE Higher Education Report, Vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 1-87. ISBN-10: 0470410787. ISBN-13: 978-0470410783.
Review
Views:
324
Email this article 