University Technological Entrepreneurship Projects: Factors of Success

   The paper presents the results of an empirical analysis of the success factors in university technological entrepreneurial projects, based on a unique empirical dataset created with the support of the project office and the office for promoting the federal project «University Technological Entrepreneurship Platform». The dataset includes a ranking of over 1,000 university projects from 2023, each of which contains information on approximately 35 characteristics, both financial and non-financial. The success indicators selected for analysis are the «final ranking position» and «investment attractiveness of the project». Statistical methods, implemented through Python libraries, were used to examine the relationships between different forms of project support and the aforementioned characteristics. The results highlight the critical role of the university environment in supporting entrepreneurial projects, while also revealing that specific support measures can exhibit varying degrees of association with project success. Two key findings are noteworthy. First, there is no positive correlation between the project’s strong embeddedness in the university environment (e.g., a team assembled within the university or a project initially started as an academic exercise) and the project’s success. Second, among the support measures implemented within the current federal project «University Technological Entrepreneurship Platform», the strongest association with the success of entrepreneurial initiatives is found in participation in startup studios. Considering contemporary discussions on the need to seek new solutions to enhance the educational and life experiences of modern students, bringing them closer to the realities of a dynamically changing labor market, the university startup studio model may serve as a source for developing new models of university organization.

1. Lafuente, E., Szerb, L., & Acs, Z.J. (2016). Country level efficiency and national systems of entrepreneurship: a data envelopment analysis approach. The Journal of Technology Transfer. Vol. 41, pp. 1260-1283, doi: 10.1007/S10961-015-9440-9

2. Acs, Z., Еstebro, T., Audretsch, D., & Robinson, D.T. (2016). Public policy to promote entrepreneurship: a call to arms. Small Business Economics. Vol. 47, pp. 35-51, doi: 10.1007/s11187-016-9712-2

3. Bedő, Z., Erdős, K., & Pittaway, L. (2020). University-centred entrepreneurial ecosystems in resource-constrained contexts. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. Vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 1149-1166, doi: 10.1108/jsbed-02-2020-0060

4. Janeska-Iliev A., Debarliev, S., & Drakulevski, L. (2020). Building up the base for entrepreneurship: the meaning of university in the entrepreneurial ecosystem. Management Research & Practice. Vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 5-14, doi: 10.47063/EBTSF.2020.0031

5. Hahn, D., Minola, T., Bosio, G., & Cassia, L. (2019). The impact of entrepreneurship education on university students’ entrepreneurial skills: a family embeddedness perspective. Small Business Economics. Vol. 55, pp. 257-282, doi: 10.1007/s11187-019-00143-y

6. Bergmann, H., Geissler, M., Hundt, C., & Grave, B. (2018). The climate for entrepreneurship at higher education institutions. Research Policy. Vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 700-716, doi: 10.1016/J.RESPOL.2018.01.018

7. Wright, M., Siegel, D., & Mustar, P. (2017). An emerging ecosystem for student start-ups. The Journal of Technology Transfer. Vol. 42, pp. 909-922, doi: 10.1007/S10961-017-9558-Z

8. Belas, J., Dvorsky, J., Tyll, L., & Zvarнková, K. (2017). Entrepreneurship of university students: Important factors and the propensity for entrepreneurship. Administratie si Management Public. Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 173-192, doi: 10.24136/OC.2019.009

9. Arroyo-Vázquez, M., Sijde, P., & Sáez, F. (2010). Innovative and creative entrepreneurship support services at universities. Service Business. No. 4, pp. 63-76, doi: 10.1007/s11628-009-0084-4

10. Hassan, A., Saleem, I., Anwar, I., & Abid, S. (2020). Entrepreneurial intention of Indian university students: The role of opportunity recognition and entrepreneurship education. Education and Training. Vol. 62, pp. 843-861, doi: 10.1108/ET-02-2020-0033

11. Sorokin, P.S., & Chernenko, S.E. (2022). Skills as declared learning outcomes of entrepreneurship training in higher education institutions across the globe: Classification and analysis with a focus on thinking skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity. Vol. 46: 101177, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101177

12. Zobnina M., Korotkov A., Rozhkov A. (2019). Structure, Challenges and Opportunities for Development of Entrepreneurial Education in Russian Universities. Forsait = Foresight. Vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 69-81, doi: 10.17323/2500-2597.2019.4.69.81 (In Eng.).

13. Bucos, T.O. (2021). A conceptual approach to the role of universities in the entrepreneurial ecosystem. Economica. Vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 81-90, doi: 10.53486/econ.2021.117.081

14. Matt, M., & Schaeffer, V. (2018). Building entrepreneurial ecosystems conducive to student entrepreneurship: New challenges for universities. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management. No. 1, pp. 9-32, doi: 10.3917/JIE.025.0009

15. Heaton, S., Siegel, D.S., & Teece, D.J. (2019). Universities and innovation ecosystems: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Industrial and Corporate Change. Vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 921-939, doi: 10.1093/ICC/DTZ038

16. Chepurenko A., Kristalova M., Wyrvich M. (2019) Historical and Institutional Determinants of Universities’ Role in Fostering Entrepreneurship. Forsait = Foresight and STI Governance, vol. 13, no 4, pp. 48-59, doi: 10.17323/2500-2597.2019.4.48.59. (In Eng.).

17. Shirokova, G.V., Bogatireva K.A., Belyaeva T.V., Laskovaya A.K, Karpinskaya E.O. (2019). Global’noe issledovanie predprinimatel’skogo duha studentov. Nacional’nyj otchet [The Global University Entrepreneurial Spirit Students’ Survey. National Report]. Moscow: 53 p. Available at: https://gsom.spbu.ru/files/folder_11/GUESSS_report_2019_RUS.pdf (accessed 28. 06. 2024). (In Russ.).

18. Sorokin, P.S., Chernenko, S.E. Vyatskaya J.A. (2024). Skills as a Result of Entrepreneurship Training in Russia: Supply and Demand Obrazovanie i samorazvitie = Education and Self Development. Vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 159-174, doi: 10.26907/esd.19.1.12. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

19. Rubin, Yu.B., Nikolsky, V.S., Sorokin, P.S., Morozova, E.B. et al. Entrepreneurship Education as a Subject of Research. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 38-53, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-6-38-53 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

20. Sorokin, P., Froumin, I., & Chernenko, S. (2022). Entrepreneurship Education in Post-Soviet Higher Education Systems: Moving into or Resisting Global Entrepreneurial Culture. In: Entrepreneurialism and Society: Consequences and Meanings. Vol. 82, pp. 161-215, doi: 10.1108/S0733-558X20220000082008

21. Sorokin, P.S., Morozova, E.V. Pavlyuk, D., Redko, T.D. (2022). How to Evaluate Students’ Entrepreneurial Projects? International Experience and Recommendations for Application in Russia. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 122-140, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2022-31-11-122-140 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

22. Ko, C.R., & An, J.I. (2019). Success Factors of Student Startups in Korea: From Employment Measures to Market Success. Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy. Vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 97-121, doi: 10.7545/ajip.2019.8.1.097

23. Olugbola, S.A. (2017). Exploring entrepreneurial readiness of youth and startup success components: Entrepreneurship training as a moderator. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. No. 2(3). pp. 155-171, doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2016.12.004

24. Bouwma-Gearhart, J., et al. (2021). Inclusively recognizing faculty innovation and entrepreneurship impact within promotion and tenure considerations. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. Vol. 7, no. 3, p. 182, doi: 10.3390/joitmc7030182

25. Sorokin P., Povalko A., Vyatskaya Yu. (2021). Informal Entrepreneurship Education: Overview of the Russian Field. Forsait = Foresight. Vol. 15, no. 4. pp. 22-31, doi: 10.17323/2500-2597.2021.4.22.31 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

26. Sorokin, P.S., & Froumin, I. (2022). «Utility» of education and the role of transformative agency: Policy challenges and agendas. Policy Futures in Education. Vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 201-214, doi: 10.1177/14782103211032080

27. Sorokin P.S., Froumin I.D. (2022). Education as a Source for Transformative Agency: Theoretical and Practical Issues. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies. No. 1, pp. 116-137, doi: 10.17323/1814-9545-2022-1-116-137 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

28. Klemenčič, M. (2017). From Student Engagement to Student Agency: Conceptual Considerations of European Policies on Student-Centered Learning in Higher Education. High Educ Policy. Vol. 30, pp. 69-85, doi: 10.1057/s41307-016-0034-4

29. Pauwels, C., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Van Hove, J. (2016). Understanding a new generation incubation model: The accelerator. Technovation. Vol. 50, pp. 13-24, doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.003