TECHNOSCIENCE AS NEW STAGE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF MODERN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Abstract
Keywords
About the Author
Vitalii G. GorokhovRussian Federation
References
1. Nordmann A. (2006) Collapse of Distance: Epistemic Strategies of Science and Technoscience. (A revised version of a plenary lecture at the annual meeting of the Danish Philosophical Association Copenhagen, March 2006). Available at: http://www.uni-bielefeld.de/ZIF/FG/2006Application/PDF/Nordmann_essay2.pdf
2. Ahmed H. (1991) Nanostructure Fabrication, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 79, no. 8, 1145 p.
3. Gorokhov V.G., Sidorenko A.S. (2009) [The role of theoretical research in the development of novel technologies]. Vestnik RAN [Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. Vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 437-444. (In Russ.)]; Gorokhov V., Lenk H. (2009) NanoTechnoScience as a Cluster of the Different Natural and Engineering Theories and Nanoethics, Silicon vs Carbon: Environmental and Biological Risks of Nanobiotechnology, Nanobionics and Hybrid Organic-Silicon Nanodevices. Freiburg/München: Springer, pp. 190-213.
4. Gorokhov V.G., Pipiya L.K. (ed.) (2009) [Nanoethics as a combination of scientific, technological and economic ethics]. Obshchestvennye i gumanitarnye nauki: tendentsii razvitiya i perspektivy sotrudnichestva [The Social Sciences and Humanities: research trends and collaborative perspectives]. Moscow: ISS RAS Publ., pp. 188-204. (In Russ.); Gorokhov V., Stepin V. (2009) Nanotechnology: Perspective for Future and Nanorisks, Silicon vs Carbon: Environmental and Biological Risks of Nanobiotechnology, Nanobionics and Hybrid Organic-Silicon Nanodevices. Freiburg/München: Springer, pp. 242-261.
5. Gorokhov V.G. (2013) [Technoscience of Galileo Galilei: reflexion about a book of MatteoValleriani “GALILEO – Engineer”]. Voprosy filosofii [Issues of Philosophy]. No 1, pp.105-116. (In Russ.)
6. Bogolyubov A.N. (1974) [Robert Hooke (1635–1703)]. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)
7. Böhme G. (1992) Am Ende des Beconschen Zeitalters, Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft [Science and Society]. Nо. 3, 129 p.
8. Gorokhov V.G. (2012) Tekhnicheskie nauki: istoriya i teoriya (istoriya nauki s filosofskoi tochki zreniya) [Engineering sciences: history and theory (history of science from the philosophical point of view)]. Moscow: Logos Publ., 512 p. (In Russ.)
9. Hentschel K. (ed.) (2012) Zur Geschichte von Forschungstechnologien: Generizität – Interstitiatät – Transfer. Diepholz, Berlin, Stuttgart: GNT-Verlag.
10. Latour B. (2003) [When things strike back: a possible contribution of «science studies» to the social science]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta [The Moscow University Herald]. Vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 20-39. Available at: http://philosophy.ru/library/latour/whenthings.html (In Russ.)
11. Gorokhov V., Grünwald A. (2011) [Each innovation has a social dimension (Technology Assessment as an applied philosophy of technology)]. Vyssheeo brasovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia]. No. 5, pp. 135-145. (In Russ.)
12. Pestre D. (2005) The Technoscience between Markets, Social Worries and the Political: How to Imagine a Better Future? In: H. Nowotny, D. Pestre, E. Schmidt-Außmann, H. Schulze-Fielitz, H.-H. Trute. The Public Nature of Science under Assault. Politics, Markets, Science and the Law. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
13. Belyi Ju.A. (1982) [Tycho de Brahe]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., pp. 167-168. (In Russ.)
14. Valleriani M., Divarci L., Siebold A. (Eng. translation) (2013) Metallurgy, Ballistics and Epistemic Instruments. The “Nova scientia” of Nicolò Tartaglia. Berlin: Edition Open Access, pр. 43-44. 1 5 . H e n t sc h e l K . ( e d .) ( 2 0 1 2 ) Zur Geschichte der Forschungstechnologien. Diepholz-Berlin-Stuttgart: Verlag für Geschichte der Naturwissenschaft und der Technik.
15. Bechmann G., Gorokhov V. (2012) [Social, philosophical and methodological problems of the technological risks in the modern society (debate about technological risks in the modern foreign literature)]. Voprosy filosofii [Issues of Philosophy]. No. 7, pp. 121-132; No 8, pp. 127-136. (In Russ.)