TECHNOSCIENCE AS NEW STAGE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF MODERN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Abstract
The article considers a new phenomenon of the modern science and technology- technoscience. Technoscience is a combination of the natural scientific theory and engineering theory. This is also a new way of the communication between science and society and between science and politics. The article analyzesinterdisciplinarity of technoscience and the role of the theoretical investigation in technoscience. Representative example of technoscience is nanotechnoscience.
Keywords
технонаука,
междисциплинарные исследования,
естественно-научная теория,
техническая теория,
техника эксперимента,
социотехнические системы,
нанотехнонаука,
technoscience,
interdisciplinary research,
natural scientific theory,
engineering theory,
experimental technology,
socio-technical systems,
nanotechnoscience
About the Author
Vitalii G. Gorokhov
Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Nordmann A. (2006) Collapse of Distance: Epistemic Strategies of Science and Technoscience. (A revised version of a plenary lecture at the annual meeting of the Danish Philosophical Association Copenhagen, March 2006). Available at: http://www.uni-bielefeld.de/ZIF/FG/2006Application/PDF/Nordmann_essay2.pdf
2. Ahmed H. (1991) Nanostructure Fabrication, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 79, no. 8, 1145 p.
3. Gorokhov V.G., Sidorenko A.S. (2009) [The role of theoretical research in the development of novel technologies]. Vestnik RAN [Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. Vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 437-444. (In Russ.)]; Gorokhov V., Lenk H. (2009) NanoTechnoScience as a Cluster of the Different Natural and Engineering Theories and Nanoethics, Silicon vs Carbon: Environmental and Biological Risks of Nanobiotechnology, Nanobionics and Hybrid Organic-Silicon Nanodevices. Freiburg/München: Springer, pp. 190-213.
4. Gorokhov V.G., Pipiya L.K. (ed.) (2009) [Nanoethics as a combination of scientific, technological and economic ethics]. Obshchestvennye i gumanitarnye nauki: tendentsii razvitiya i perspektivy sotrudnichestva [The Social Sciences and Humanities: research trends and collaborative perspectives]. Moscow: ISS RAS Publ., pp. 188-204. (In Russ.); Gorokhov V., Stepin V. (2009) Nanotechnology: Perspective for Future and Nanorisks, Silicon vs Carbon: Environmental and Biological Risks of Nanobiotechnology, Nanobionics and Hybrid Organic-Silicon Nanodevices. Freiburg/München: Springer, pp. 242-261.
5. Gorokhov V.G. (2013) [Technoscience of Galileo Galilei: reflexion about a book of MatteoValleriani “GALILEO – Engineer”]. Voprosy filosofii [Issues of Philosophy]. No 1, pp.105-116. (In Russ.)
6. Bogolyubov A.N. (1974) [Robert Hooke (1635–1703)]. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)
7. Böhme G. (1992) Am Ende des Beconschen Zeitalters, Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft [Science and Society]. Nо. 3, 129 p.
8. Gorokhov V.G. (2012) Tekhnicheskie nauki: istoriya i teoriya (istoriya nauki s filosofskoi tochki zreniya) [Engineering sciences: history and theory (history of science from the philosophical point of view)]. Moscow: Logos Publ., 512 p. (In Russ.)
9. Hentschel K. (ed.) (2012) Zur Geschichte von Forschungstechnologien: Generizität – Interstitiatät – Transfer. Diepholz, Berlin, Stuttgart: GNT-Verlag.
10. Latour B. (2003) [When things strike back: a possible contribution of «science studies» to the social science]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta [The Moscow University Herald]. Vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 20-39. Available at: http://philosophy.ru/library/latour/whenthings.html (In Russ.)
11. Gorokhov V., Grünwald A. (2011) [Each innovation has a social dimension (Technology Assessment as an applied philosophy of technology)]. Vyssheeo brasovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia]. No. 5, pp. 135-145. (In Russ.)
12. Pestre D. (2005) The Technoscience between Markets, Social Worries and the Political: How to Imagine a Better Future? In: H. Nowotny, D. Pestre, E. Schmidt-Außmann, H. Schulze-Fielitz, H.-H. Trute. The Public Nature of Science under Assault. Politics, Markets, Science and the Law. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
13. Belyi Ju.A. (1982) [Tycho de Brahe]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., pp. 167-168. (In Russ.)
14. Valleriani M., Divarci L., Siebold A. (Eng. translation) (2013) Metallurgy, Ballistics and Epistemic Instruments. The “Nova scientia” of Nicolò Tartaglia. Berlin: Edition Open Access, pр. 43-44. 1 5 . H e n t sc h e l K . ( e d .) ( 2 0 1 2 ) Zur Geschichte der Forschungstechnologien. Diepholz-Berlin-Stuttgart: Verlag für Geschichte der Naturwissenschaft und der Technik.
15. Bechmann G., Gorokhov V. (2012) [Social, philosophical and methodological problems of the technological risks in the modern society (debate about technological risks in the modern foreign literature)]. Voprosy filosofii [Issues of Philosophy]. No. 7, pp. 121-132; No 8, pp. 127-136. (In Russ.)
Review
Views:
663
Email this article 