Digital Avatar as a Mediator of the Educational Process: Opportunities, Limitations, and Prospects
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-11-31-53
Abstract
This article examines the functions, affordances, and limitations of digital avatars as mediators of educational interaction and formulates the conditions for their successful integration into teaching practices. In this study, a digital avatar is defined as a visual virtual agent representing a human or artificial intelligence, capable of communication and interaction within the digital educational environment. The work is grounded in a sociotechnical approach and considers the digital avatar not only as a technological solution but also as a new actor in educational interaction. Drawing on a thematic literature review (2020–2025), analysis of EdTech company cases, and a reflexive author experiment, the study identifies key functions and constraints of avatars in education and proposes a four‑level model that integrates the technical, psycho‑pedagogical, sociocultural, and ethical dimensions of avatars’ mediating role. The findings reveal the complex sociotechnical nature of digital avatars, their pedagogical potential, and the social challenges of implementation in educational practice. The study demonstrates the potential of digital avatars to enhance short‑term learner engagement and motivation, facilitate multilingual content delivery, and reduce time spent on preparing instructional videos. It concludes that avatars should be viewed not as replacements for teachers but as powerful auxiliary tools that complement and extend their capabilities, with effectiveness contingent on the education system’s readiness for change – from thoughtful strategy design and teacher professional development to clear ethical frameworks. The conclusion outlines principles for designing and implementing digital avatars as mediators of educational interaction and suggests key directions for further research and practice.
About the Author
D. A. IvanchenkoRussian Federation
Dmitry A. Ivanchenko – Ph.D. (Sociology Sciences), Head of the Laboratory of Digital Practices in Education
10B Volkova str., Noginsk, Moscow Region, 142401
References
1. Vellaichamy K. Artificial Intelligence and its Significance in Education: A Theoretical Perspectives // Shanlax International Journal of English. 2023. Vol. 12. No. S1-Dec. P. 452–456. DOI: 10.34293/rtdh.v12iS1-Dec.118
2. Kabudi T., Pappas I., Olsen D.H. AI-enabled adaptive learning systems: A systematic mapping of the literature // Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 2021. Vol. 2. Article no. 100017. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100017
3. Drugova, E., Zhuravleva, I., Zakharova, U., Sotnikova, V., Yakovleva, K. (2022). Artificial Intelligence for Learning Analytics and Instruction-al Design Steps: An Overview of Solutions. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. No. 4, pp. 107-153, doi: 10.17323/1814-9545-2022-4-107-153 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
4. Herbert C., Dołżycka J.D. Teaching online with an artificial pedagogical agent as a teacher and visual avatars for self-other representation of the learners. Effects on the learning performance and the perception and satisfaction of the learners with online learning: previous and new findings // Frontiers in Education. 2024. Vol. 9. Article no. 1416033. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1416033
5. Lindberg S., Jönsson A. Preservice Teachers Training with Avatars: A Systematic Literature Review of ‘Human-in-the-Loop’ Simulations in Teacher Education and Special Education // Education Sciences. 2023. Vol. 13. No. 8. Article no. 817. DOI: 10.3390/educsci13080817
6. Nikolskiy, V.S. (2025). Communicative Artificial Intelligence: Conceptualizing a New Reality in Education. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 152-168, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-6-152-168 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
7. Alam T.M., Stoica G.A., Sharma K., Özgöbek Ö. Digital technologies in the classrooms in the last decade (2014–2023): a bibliometric analysis // Frontiers in Education. 2025. Vol. 10. Article no. 1533588. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1533588
8. Fink M.C., Robinson S.A., Ertl B. AI-based avatars are changing the way we learn and teach: benefits and challenges // Frontiers in Education. 2024. Vol. 9. Article no. 1416307. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1416307
9. Zhang Y., Lucas M., Bem-Haja P., Pedro L. AI versus human-generated voices and avatars: rethinking user engagement and cognitive load // Education and Information Technologies. 2025. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-025-13654-x
10. Jasanoff S., Kim S.-H. Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. University of Chicago Press, 2015. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226276663.001.0001
11. Yin R.K. Case study research and applications: design and methods. 6th edition. Los Angeles; London; New Delhi; Singapore; Washington DC; Melbourne: SAGE, 2018. 453 p. URL: https://ebooks.umu.ac.ug/librarian/books-file/Case%20Study%20Research%20and%20Applications.pdf (дата обращения: 14.08.2025).
12. Braun V., Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology // Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006. Vol. 3. No. 2. P. 77–101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
13. Stephenson N. Snow Crash. Bantam Books, 1992. 541 p. URL: https://www.nothuman.net/images/files/discussion/4/04ca4ae88a63721aa7144430117ab4ca.pdf (дата обращения: 24.08.2025).
14. Yee N., Bailenson J. The Proteus Effect: The Effect of Transformed Self-Representation on Behavior // Human Communication Research. 2007. Vol. 33. No. 3. P. 271–290. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00299.x
15. Takano M., Taka F. Fancy avatar identification and behaviors in the virtual world: Preceding avatar customization and succeeding communication // Computers in Human Behavior Reports. 2022. Vol. 6. Article no. 100176. DOI: 10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100176
16. Yang F.-C., Acevedo P., Guo S., Choi M., Mousas C. Embodied Conversational Agents in Extended Reality: A Systematic Review // IEEE Access. 2025. Vol. 13. P. 79805–79824. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3566698
17. Zhang Y., Pan W. A scoping review of embodied conversational agents in education: trends and innovations from 2014 to 2024 // Interactive Learning Environments. 2025. Vol. 33. No. 7. P. 1–22. DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2025.2468972
18. Gibson D., Kovanovic V., Ifenthaler D., Dexter S., Feng S. Learning theories for artificial intelligence promoting learning processes // British Journal of Educational Technology. 2023. Vol. 54. No. 5. P. 1125–1146. DOI: 10.1111/bjet.13341
19. Karagozlu D., Gezer F. Avatars and Artificial Intelligence in education: A bibliometric analysis // Proceedings of the International Conference on Virtual Learning – Virtual Learning – Virtual Reality (20th edition). The National Institute for Research & Development in Informatics – ICI Bucharest (ICI Publishing House), 2025. P. 396–406. DOI: 10.58503/icvl-v20y202533
20. Zhang R., Wu Q. Impact of using virtual avatars in educational videos on user experience // Scientific Reports. 2024. Vol. 14. No. 1. Article no. 6592. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-56716-9
21. Netland T., Von Dzengelevski O., Tesch K., Kwasnitschka D. Comparing human-made and AI-generated teaching videos: An experimental study on learning effects // Computers & Education. 2025. Vol. 224. Article no. 105164. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105164
22. Garcia M.B. Teachers in the metaverse: the influence of avatar appearance and behavioral realism on perceptions of instructor credibility and teaching effectiveness // Interactive Learning Environments. 2025. P. 1–17. DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2025.2462144
23. Islam M.Z., Wang G. Avatars in the educational metaverse // Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art. 2025. Vol. 8. No. 1. Article no. 15. DOI: 10.1186/s42492-025-00196-9
24. Hu Y.-H., Yu H.-Y., Tzeng J.-W., Zhong K.-C. Using an avatar-based digital collaboration platform to foster ethical education for university students // Computers & Education. 2023. Vol. 196. Article no. 104728. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104728
25. Ananin, D.P., Suvirova, A.Yu. (2024). Immersive Technologies in the Educational Practice of Russian Universities. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 112-135, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-5-112-135 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
26. Hutson J., Hutson P. Immersive Technologies // Inclusive Smart Museums. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024. P. 153–228. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-43615-4_5
27. Zhang C., Mo L. The Effectiveness of Virtual Digital Human Pedagogical Agents in Virtual Reality Learning Environments: A Meta-Analysis of 36 Empirical Studies // Journal of Visual and Performing Arts Research. 2025. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 37–61. DOI: 10.71204/6p1ny979
28. Zhang S., Jaldi C.D., Schroeder N.L., López A.A., Gladstone J.R., Heidig S. Pedagogical agent design for K–12 education: A systematic review // Computers & Education. 2024. Vol. 223. Article no. 105165. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105165
29. Van Der Meer N., Van Der Werf V., Brinkman W.-P., Specht M. Virtual reality and collaborative learning: a systematic literature review // Frontiers in Virtual Reality. 2023. Vol. 4. Article no. 1159905. DOI: 10.3389/frvir.2023.1159905
30. Arguedas M., Daradoumis T., Caballé S. Measuring the effects of pedagogical agent cognitive and affective feedback on students’ academic performance // Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. 2024. Vol. 7. Article no. 1495342. DOI: 10.3389/frai.2024.1495342
31. Mabanza N., De Wet L. Determining the Usability Effect of Pedagogical Interface Agents on Adult Computer Literacy Training // E-Learning Paradigms and Applications: Studies in Computational Intelligence. / Eds. M. Ivanović, L.C. Jain. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014. Vol. 528. P. 145–183. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-41965-2_6
32. Kreijns K., Yau J., Weidlich J., Weinberger A. Towards a comprehensive framework of social presence for online, hybrid, and blended learning // Frontiers in Education. 2024. Vol. 8. Article no. 1286594. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1286594
33. Czahajda R., Čairović N., Černko M. Live Online Education Efficiency Mediators From the Actor Network Theory Perspective // Frontiers in Education. 2022. Vol. 7. Article no. 859783. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2022.859783
34. Mori M., MacDorman K., Kageki N. The Uncanny Valley [From the Field] // IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine. 2012. Vol. 19. No. 2. P. 98–100. DOI: 10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811
35. Ahmad O., Maliha H., Ahmed I. AI Syndrome: an intellectual asset for students or a progressive cognitive decline // Asian Journal of Psychiatry. 2024. Vol. 94. Article no. 103969. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2024.103969
36. Shen X., Teng M. F. Three-wave cross-lagged model on the correlations between critical thinking skills, self-directed learning competency and AI-assisted writing // Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2024. Vol. 52. Article no. 101524. DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101524























