Preview

Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia

Advanced search

Generational Communities in Higher Education: Selection Criteria, Self-Identification and Role in the Stability of the University

https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-11-108-124

Abstract

Solving the problems of modern Russian higher education requires the search for new methodological approaches. Such an approach can be a generational approach. One of the key issues of applying this approach in the sociology of higher education, which has not been adequately reflected in scientific literature, is the search and justification of criteria and generational boundaries of the university community.

The scientific novelty of the research consists in an attempt to study the ideas of the employees of modern Russian universities about the criteria and boundaries of generations of university communities. For the first time, a qualitative empirical study (interview) of university employees in the Ural Federal District (n=41) was conducted. It allowed us to record a wide range of quantitative (age, work experience) and qualitative (the education system in which the employee was formed; the historical period of the employee’s inclusion in the higher education system; position as a stage of mastering the content of work; attitude to digital technologies and the degree of mastery of them; initiative / knowledge and experience; flexibility and adaptability to changing external conditions, etc.) criteria for differentiating the university community. The mechanisms of self-identification of university employees with a specific generation have been identified. It has been established that the foundation that gives stability to the university is the middle generation.

The article contributes to the ongoing discussion about the generational structure of the university community by offering empirical evidence substantiating the relevance and prospects of using the generational approach in higher education. The results of the study make it possible to expand the theoretical understanding of the processes that take place in Russian higher education and to develop practical recommendations for the development of a meaningful and differentiated age policy at universities.

About the Author

N. V. Shabrova
Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin
Russian Federation

Nina V. Shabrova – Dr. Sci (Sociology), Prof.

19, Mira str., Ekaterinburg, 620002



References

1. Brovkin, A.V. (2018). Problems of the Modern Russian Higher Education System and Ways to Solve Them in the Interests of All Participants in the Educational Process: Part 1. Sovremennoe obrazovanie = Modern Education. No. 1, pp. 1-10, doi: 10.25136/2409-8736.2018.1.25053 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

2. Berk, R.A. (2013). Multigenerational Diversity in the Academic Workplace: Implications for Practice. Journal of Higher Education Management. Vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 10-23. Available at: https://www.ronberk.com/articles/2013_diversity.pdf (accessed 19.08.2025).

3. Romanov, D.V. (2013). Generational Behavioral Attitudes Influencing the Occurrence of Conflicts in Interpersonal Communication. Izvestiya Samarskoj gosudarstvennoj sel’skohozyajstvennoj akademii = Proceedings of the Samara State Agricultural Academy. No. 2, pp. 127-131. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19073840 (accessed 19.08.2025). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

4. Pugach, V.F. (2023). One More Time about the Age of Teachers in Russian Universities: Old Problems and New Trends. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 118-133, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-3-118-133 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

5. Van Rossem, A.H.D. (2019). Generations as Social Categories: An Exploratory Cognitive Study of Generational Identity and Generational Stereotypes in a Multigenerational Workforce. Journal of Organizational Behavior. Vol. 40, no. 4. pp. 434-455, doi: 10.1002/job.2341

6. Durakova, I.B., Mayer, E.V. (2021). Success and Development of Older Workers as a Challenge to Higher Education. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 144-155, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-6-144-155 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

7. Fedorov, A.A., llaltdinova, E.Yu., Frolova, S.V. (2018). Convention of Generations in the New World of Education. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2018. Vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 28-38, doi: l0.31992/0869-3617-2018-27-7-28-38 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

8. Nidergaus, E.O. (2023). Professional Values of Teachers of Different Generations in the Conditions of Transition to the Model of an Entrepreneurial Universit. Vestnik Surgutskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta = Surgut State Pedagogical University Bulletin. Vol. 86, no. 5, рр. 43-49, doi: 10.26105/SSPU.2023.86.5.004 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

9. Rastorguev, S.V. (2021). Strategy for Overcoming Intergenerational Gaps in Modern Russia. Vlast’ [Power]. Vol. 29, no. 6, рр. 146-150, doi: 10.31171/vlast.v29i6.8707 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

10. Mannheim, K. (2000). Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. The Problem of Generations – Competitiveness – Economic Ambitions. Moscow, INION RAN, 164 p. ISBN: 5-248-01334-8. (In Russ.).

11. Bourdieu, P. (1978). La “Jeunesse” N’est Qu’un Mot. Entretien avec Anne-Marie Métailié. Les Jeunes et le Premier Employ. Paris, Association des Ages. Pp. 520-530. Available at: http://www.homme-moderne.org/societe/socio/bourdieu/questions/jeuness.html (accessed 19.08.2025).

12. Strauss, W., Howe, N. (1991). Generations: The History of America’s Future, 1584 to 2069. New York, William Morrow & Co, 538 p. ISBN: 0688081339.

13. Twenge, D. (2019). Pokolenie I. Pochemu pokolenie Interneta utratilo buntarskii dukh, stalo bolee tolerantnym [Generation I. Why the Internet Generation Has Lost Its Rebellious Spirit and Become More Tolerant]. Moscow, RIPOL Classic, 406 p. ISBN: 978-5-386-12783-1. (In Russ.).

14. Dzakhova, L.H., Badova, L.A. (2017). The Relay Race of Generations In The Elitist Dimension. Vlast’ [Power]. Vol. 25, no. 2, рр. 116-122. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29449343 (accessed 19.08.2025). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

15. Pilcher, J. (1994). Mannheim’s Sociology of Generations: An Undervalued Legacy. British Journal of Sociology. Vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 481-495, doi: 10.2307/591659

16. Beck, U., Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2009). Global Generations and the Trap of Methodological Nationalism for a Cosmopolitan Turn in the Sociology of Youth and Generation. European Sociological Review. Vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 25-36, doi: 10.1093/esr/jcn032

17. Belyaev, L.A. (2022). “Adult” Youth in the Modern Social Space of Russia. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Sociologiya = Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Sociology. Vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 812-827, doi: 10.22363/2313-2272-2022-22-4-812-827 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

18. Hernandez-de-Menendez, М., Escobar Díaz, C.A., Morales-Menendez, R. (2020). Educational Experiences with Generation Z. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJI-DeM). Vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 847-859, doi: 10.1007/s12008-020-00674-9

19. Mohr, K.A.J., Mohr, E.S.M. (2017). Understanding Generation Z Students to Promote a Contemporary Learning Environment. Journal on Empowering Teaching Excellence. Vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 84-94, doi: 10.15142/T3M05T

20. Martynov, G.P. (2023). A New Generation in the Context of Digitalization. Aktual’nye voprosy obrazovaniya = Actual Issues of Education. No. 3, pp. 93-98. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_54360991_32337624.pdf (accessed 19.08.2025). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

21. Kostina, N.B., Chizhov, A.A. (2024). The Role of Youth in Overcoming the Digital Inequality of Generational Groups. Social’nye i gumanitarnye znaniya = Social and Humanitarian Knowledge. Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 64-79, doi: 10.18255/2412-6519-2024-1-64-79 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

22. Razina, T.V. (2019). Professional Scientific Values of Three Generations of Russian Scientists. Vestnik Syktyvkarskogo universiteta. Seriya 2: Biologiya. Geologiya. Himiya. Ekologiya = Bulletin of Syktyvkar University. Series 2: Biology. Geology. Chemistry. Ecology. No. 9, рр. 7-17. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_39156073_95526864.pdf (accessed 19.08.2025). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

23. Kharchenkov, I.S., Mammadov, T.A. (2022). The Study of the Peculiarities of the Attitude to Education Among Representatives of Different Generations. Social’no-psihologicheskie problemy mental’nosti/mentaliteta = Socio-psychological Problems of Mentality/Mentality. No. 18, pp. 111-119. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_50453719_11197183.pdf (accessed 19.08.2025). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

24. Seibert, S.A. (2021). Problem-Based Learning: A Strategy to Foster Generation Z’s Critical Thinking and Perseverance. Teaching and Learning in Nursing. Vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 85-88, doi: 10.1016/j.teln.2020.09.002

25. Yapparova, D.I., Patskov, A.E. (2018). Theory of Generations and the Role of Young Teachers in the Higher Education System. Chelovek i yazyk v kommunikativnom prostranstve = Man and Language in the Communicative Space. Vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 327-331. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_36513341_37042519.pdf (accessed 19.08.2025). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

26. Ablazhey, A.M. (2010). Generations in Science: The Experience of Empirical Analysis. Sociologiya nauki i tekhnologij = Sociology of Science and Technology. Vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 47-56. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_17248260_56627023.pdf (accessed 19.08.2025). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

27. Shuklina, E.A., Pevnaya, M.V., Shirokova, E.A. (2020). Adaptation Potential of Teachers of the Third Age in the Conditions of Higher Education Transformation. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. Vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 146-169, doi: 10.17853/1994-5639-2020-1-146-169 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

28. Pishik, V.I., Gavrilova, A.V., Sivrikova, N.V. (2016). Styles of Intergenerational Pedagogical Interaction Between Teachers and Students of Different Generational Groups. Rossijskij psihologicheskij zhurnal = Russian Psychological Journal. No. 3, pp. 245-264, doi: 10.21702/rpj.2016.3.14 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

29. Alekmenskaya, V.S. (2024). Theory of Generations as a Factor of Personnel Management in the Field of Education. Vestnik nauki = Bulletin of Science. Vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 120-126. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_67225833_95434853.pdf (accessed 19.08.2025). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

30. Dumnaya, N.N. (2011). The Problem of Generational Change in Russian Science. Mir novoj ekonomiki = The World of the New Economy. No. 1, pp. 11-17. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_28945945_68683144.pdf (accessed 19.08.2025). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).


Review

Views: 14


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0869-3617 (Print)
ISSN 2072-0459 (Online)