Functional Stratification of AI Assistance Models in Academic Writing: Student Perceptions in Indonesian Universities
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2026-35-3-149-168
Аннотация
AI’s growth has changed many areas, including higher education and the way students write academically. Students’ views of AI help models, on the other hand, are complicated and varied, depending on how they are used. This study focused on how students view AI-assisted models in academic writing. There were 157 students in this exploratory quantitative study. Researchers used Principal Component Analysis to reduce the number of factors in the data and the Rasch model to see how much students agreed on the different sorts of AI assistance. The results of the quantitative analysis indicate that all factor loadings exceed 0.5, suggesting a strong relationship between the variables. The model demonstrates an acceptable to satisfactory fit, though some indices are marginal (χ2/df = 2.631; RMSEA = 0.090 [CI: 0.074–0.11]; GFI = 0.860; AGFI = 0.820; CFI = 0.970; NFI/IFI/NNFI = 0.960). Additionally, student perceptions are reported to fall within the logit range of –1.14 to +1.63, reflecting varying degrees of agreement regarding the role of AI in academic writing. The results show that there are two AI function models in academic writing: AI-assisted idea generation and AI-enhanced academic writing quality, which possess 15 components. AI helps students generate ideas, develop content, organize their writing, refine their thoughts, and conduct research, depending on the sources. AI also helps with language accuracy, discourse coherence, and cohesion in texts, and style clarity and enhancements. The findings of this study indicate that students should employ AI not only for the technical components of writing but also to augment introspective, analytical, and argumentative methodologies.
Об авторах
A. Yundayani
STKIP Kusuma Negara
Индонезия
Индонезия
Audi Yundayani – Doctor in English Language Learning, Academic staff member
Scopus Author ID: 57211375983
Jl. Raya Bogor № KM. 24, Cijantung, Kec. Ps. Rebo, Kota Jakarta Timur, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 13770
A. Mukminin
Universitas Jambi
Индонезия
Индонезия
Amirul Mukminin – Professor in Educational Policy, Head of the Research and Community Service Institute
Scopus Author ID: 55850809900
Lantai 2, Mendalo Jalan Raya Jambi – Muara Bulian KM 15, Mendalo,Jambi, 36361
F. Alghadari
Universitas Jambi
Россия
Россия
Fiki Alghadari – Doctor in Mathematics Education, Academic staff member
Scopus Author ID: 57200723866
Lantai 2, Mendalo Jalan Raya Jambi – Muara Bulian KM 15, Mendalo,Jambi, 36361
Список литературы
1. Archana, S.N., Renjith, V.R., Padmakumar, P.K., S. C., Aboobaker, N. (2025). AI Assisted Learning and Research: An Exploratory Study among University Students and Scholars. Discover Education. Vol. 4, no. 1, article no. 390, doi: 10.1007/s44217-025-00814-x.
2. Nabhan, S., Habók, A. (2025). The Digital Literacy Academic Writing Scale: Exploratory factor analysis. SAGE Open. Vol. 15, no. 1, doi: 10.1177/21582440241311709.
3. Chen, Y., Luo, Z. (2023). Pre-Trained Joint Model for Intent Classification and Slot Filling with Semantic Feature Fusion. Sensors. Vol. 23, no. 5, article no. 2848, doi: 10.3390/s23052848.
4. Kim, B., Kim, M. (2024). How Artificial Intelligence-Induced Job Insecurity Shapes Knowledge Dynamics: The Mitigating Role of Artificial Intelligence Self-Efficacy. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. Vol. 9, no. 4, article no. 100590, doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2024.100590.
5. Cui, Y., He, W., Du, X., Zeng, M., Liu, D. (2025). The Impact of AI Writing Assistants on Academic Writing Performance. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies. Vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1-28, doi: 10.4018/IJDET.391326.
6. Apriani, E., Daulay, S.H., Aprilia, F., Marzuki, A.G., Warsah, I., Supardan, D. (2025). A Mixed-Method Study on the Effectiveness of Using ChatGPT in Academic Writing and Students’ Perceived Experiences. Journal of Language Education. Vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 26-45, doi: 10.17323/jle.2025.17913.
7. Pratiwi, H., Ridha, M. (2025). Between Shortcut and Ethics: Navigating the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Academic Writing among Indonesian Doctoral Students. European Journal of Education. Vol. 60, no. 2, doi: 10.1111/ejed.70083.
8. Yusra, S.R., Hanifa, R. (2025). Unveiling Indonesian Higher Education Students’ English Academic Writing Misconduct in the Era of Technology & AI: Comprehension vs Practice. World Journal of English Language. Vol. 15, no. 5, article no. 220, doi: 10.5430/wjel.v15n5p220.
9. Zou, M., Huang, L. (2023). To Use or Not to Use? Understanding Doctoral Students’ Acceptance of ChatGPT in Writing Through Technology Acceptance Model. Frontiers in Psychology. Vol. 14, article no. 1259531, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1259531.
10. Jin, F., Lin, C.-H., Lai, C. (2025). Modeling AI-assisted Writing: How Self-Regulated Learning Influences Writing Outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior. Vol. 165, article no. 108538, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2024.108538.
11. Gao, R., Yu, D., Gao, B., Hua, H., Hui, Z. et al. (2025). Legal Regulation of AI-Assisted Academic Writing: Challenges, Frameworks, and Pathways. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. Vol. 8, article no. 1546064, doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1546064.
12. Rafi, M.S., Amjad, I. (2025). The Role of Generative AI in Writing Doctoral Dissertation: Perceived Opportunities, Challenges, and Facilitating Strategies to Promote Human Agency. Discover Education. Vol. 4, no. 1, article no. 165, doi: 10.1007/s44217-025-00503-9.
13. Abdullah, M.Y. (2025). Probing into EFL Students’ Perceptions about the Impact of Utilizing AI-Powered Tools on Their Academic Writing Practices. Education and Information Technologies. Vol. 30, pp. 21189–21220, doi: 10.1007/s10639-025-13601-w.
14. Xu, J., Zheng, Y. (2025). Negotiating Understanding, Control, and Authorship: L2 Learners’ Experiences with AI-Assisted Paraphrasing in Academic Writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. Vol. 78, article no. 101591, doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101591.
15. Anani, G.E., Nyamekye, E., Bafour-Koduah, D. (2025). Using Artificial Intelligence for Academic Writing in Higher Education: The Perspectives of University Students in Ghana. Discover Education. Vol. 4, article no. 46, doi: 10.1007/s44217-025-00434-5.
16. Xu, J. (2025). Harnessing AI in Academic Writing: The Complex Interplay of AI literacy and Self-Directed Learning among University L2 Learners. System. Vol. 135, article no. 103855, doi: 10.1016/j.system.2025.103855
17. Tuong, T.P.L., Tran, T.-T. (2025). The Differential Impact of AI Еools among EFL University Learners: A Process Writing Approach. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. Vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 452-471, doi: 10.26803/ijlter.24.5.24.
18. Radtke, A., Rummel, N. (2025). Generative AI in Academic Writing: Does Information on Authorship Impact Learners’ Revision Behavior? Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence. Vol. 8, article no. 100350, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100350.
19. Wang, J., Fan, W. (2025). The Effect of ChatGPT on Students’ Learning Performance, Learning Perception, and Higher-Order Thinking: Insights from a Meta-Analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. Vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1-21, doi: 10.1057/s41599-025-04787-y.
20. Hu, H., Zhou, Q., Hashim, H. (2025). Negotiating Identity in the Age of ChatGPT: Non-native English Researchers’ Experiences with AI-Assisted Academic Writing. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. Vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1-11, doi: 10.1057/s41599-025-05351-4.
21. Octaberlina, L. R., Muslimin, A. I., Chamidah, D., Surur, M., & Mustikawan, A. (2024). Exploring the Impact of AI Threats on Originality and Critical Thinking in Academic Writing. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology. Vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 8805-8814, doi: 10.55214/25768484.v8i6.3878.
22. Prakash, A., Aggarwal, S., Varghese, J.J., Varghese, J.J. (2025). Writing without Borders: AI and Cross-Cultural Convergence in Academic Writing Quality. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. Vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1-11, doi: 10.1057/s41599-025-05484-6.
23. Wang, C., Wang, Z. (2025). Investigating L2 Writers’ Critical AI Literacy in AI-Assisted Writing: An APSE Model. Journal of Second Language Writing. Vol. 67, article no. 101187, doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101187.
24. Akyürek, M.İ., Aypay, A., Karaferye, F., Özdemir, M. (2025). Interrelationships within the Four-Frame Leadership Model in Educational Settings: A Meta-Analytical Study. International Journal of Educational Management. Vol. 39, no. 4 pp. 837-862, doi: 10.1108/ijem-09-2024-0547.
25. Verschueren, N., Van Dessel, J., Verslyppe, A., Schoensetters, Y., Baelmans, M. (2023). A Maturity Matrix Model to Strengthen the Quality Cultures in Higher Education. Education Sciences. Vol. 13, no. 2, article no. 123, doi: 10.3390/educsci13020123.
26. Tyushka, A., Phinnemore, D., Weiß, W. (2022). Joint Institutional Frameworks in EU Bilateral Agreements: Joint Bodies, Rules and Principles, and Special Procedures. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. Vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 1124-1143, doi: 10.1111/jcms.13333.
27. Mills, D., Kumar, R., Wispelwey, B., Asi, Y., Tanous, O. et al. (2024). Social Medicine Education Towards Structural Transformation in Palestine. Social Science & Medicine. Vol. 361, article no. 117332, doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117332.
28. Black, N. (2026). Pluralistic Research Designs in Management and Organization Studies: Integrating Paradigms Through Structural and Anti-Structural Frameworks. British Journal of Management. e70048, doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.70048.
29. Park, J.-H., Su, M.N. (2025). Adult Learners’ Participation in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Determinants and Barriers (2000–2025). Trends in Higher Education. Vol. 5, no. 1, article no. 19, doi: 10.3390/higheredu5010019.
30. Zhu, K., Lauro, F. M., Su, H. (2018). Stratification Modelling of Key Bacterial Taxa Driven by Metabolic Dynamics in Meromictic Lakes. Scientific Reports. Vol. 8, no. 1, article no. 9538, doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27973-2.
31. Ruaño, G., et al. (2021). Subanalysis of the CYP-GUIDES Trial: CYP2D6 Functional Stratification and Operational Timeline Selection. Psychiatry Research. Vol. 297, article no. 113571, doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113571.
32. Huang, B., et al. (2025). Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Tool for Baseline Functional Phenotyping in Cardiac Rehabilitation. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders. Vol. 26, no. 1, article no. 64. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-05393-1.
33. de Oliveira Cruz, A., Santana, S.M.M., Costa, C.M., da Costa, L.V.G., Ferraz, D.D. (2020). Prevalence of Falls in Frail Elderly Users of Ambulatory Assistive Devices: A Comparative Study. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. Vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 510-514, doi: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1587016.
34. Bui, M.N. (2024). Evaluating the Quality of ChatGPT 3.5-Generated Academic Essays [Paper]. Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology. Available at: https://dspace.jaist.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/10119/19349/5/paper.pdf (accessed 20.01.2026)
35. Raheem, B.R., Anjum, F., Ghafar, Z.N. (2023). Exploring the Profound Impact of Artificial Intelligence Applications (Quillbot, Grammarly and ChatGPT) on English Academic Writing: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Integrated Research. Vol. 1, no. 10, pp. 599-622, doi: 10.59890/ijir.v1i10.366.
36. Ovadia, S. (2011). Managing Citations with Cost-Free Tools. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian. Pp. 37-41, doi: 10.1080/01639269.2011.565408.
37. Panda, S. (2023). Reference Management Software for Assisting Researchers: A Comparative Analysis of Usage and Usability. In: Library Technology with New Perceptions (pp. 191–206), doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7898059.
38. Rao, S., Moon, K. (2021). Literature Search for Systematic Reviews. In: S. Patole (Ed.), Principles and Practice of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (pp. 11-31). Springer International Publishing, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-71921-0_2.
39. Salija, K., Hidayat, R., Patak, A.A. (2016). Mendeley Impact on Scientific Writing: Thematic Analysis. International Journal of Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology. Vol. 6, no. 5, article no. 657, doi: 10.18517/ijaseit.6.5.1140.
40. Halgamuge, M.N. (2017). The Use and Analysis of Anti-Plagiarism Software: Turnitin Tool for Formative Assessment and Feedback, doi: 10.1002/cae.21842.
41. Ismail, A. (2025). The Dynamics of Plagiarism in ESL Writing among Malaysian Undergraduates. ATTARBAWIY Malaysian Online Journal of Education. Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 115-125, doi: 10.53840/attarbawiy.v9i1.277.
42. Tran, H.N., Le, T.T.N., Tran, V.B.U. (2025). AI Tools in Learning Academic Writing: Benefits and Challenges for MA Students in the English Language Studies at the Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City. International Journal of AI in Language Education. Vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 74-91, doi: 10.54855/ijaile.25215.
43. Khalifa, M., Albadawy, M. (2024). Using Artificial Intelligence in Academic Writing and Research: An Essential Productivity Tool. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update. Vol. 5, article no. 100145, doi: 10.1016/j.cmpbup.2024.100145.
44. Tarchi, C., Villalón, R., Vandermeulen, N., et al. (2024). Recursivity in Source-Based Writing: A Process Analysis. Reading and Writing. Vol. 37, pp. 2571-2593, doi: 10.1007/s11145-023-10482-8.
45. Overstreet, M. (2022). Writing as Extended Mind: Recentering Cognition, Rethinking Tool. Computers and Composition. Vol. 63, article no. 102700, doi: 10.1016/j.compcom.2022.102700.
46. Coleman, L., Tuck, J. (2020). Understanding Student Writing from Lecturers’ Perspectives: Acknowledging Pedagogic Complexity to Support Transformative Practices in Context. Studies in Higher Education. Pp. 1-13, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1711043.
47. Boscolo, P., Arfé, B., Quarisa, M. (2007). Improving the Quality of Students’ Academic Writing: An Intervention Study. Studies in Higher Education. Vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 419-438, doi: 10.1080/03075070701476092.
48. Clark, R., Ivanič, R. (1991). Consciousness-Raising about the Writing Process. In: Language Awareness in the Classroom (p. 18). Routledge, doi: 10.4324/9781315845524.
49. McAdam, R. (2004). Knowledge Creation and Idea Generation: A Critical Quality Perspective. Technovation. Vol. 24, pp. 697-705, doi: 10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00169-4.
50. Parkinson, J. (2019). Multimodal Student Texts: Implications for ESP. In: K. Hyland & L.L.C. Wong (Eds.), Specialised English: New directions in ESP and EAP Research and Practice. Routledge, doi: 10.1590/1678-460x2020360408.
51. Hyland, K., Gebhard, M. (2007). Genre Pedagogy: Language, Literacy, and L2 Writing Instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.005.
52. Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and Invisibility: Authorial Identity in Academic Writing. Journal of Pragmatics. Vol. 34, pp. 1091-1112, doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00035-8.
53. Syahrin, A., Dawud, Suwignyo, H., Priyatni, E.T. (2019). Creative Thinking Patterns in Students’ Scientific Works. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. Vol. 81, pp. 21-36, doi: 10.14689/ejer.2019.81.2.
54. Halaweh, M. (2023). ChatGPT in Education: Strategies for Responsible Implementation. Contemporary Educational Technology. Vol. 15, no. 2, article no. ep421, doi: 10.30935/cedtech/13036.
55. Crossley, S.A., Muldner, K., McNamara, D.S. (2016). Idea Generation in Student Writing: Computational Assessments and Links to Successful Writing, doi: 10.1177/0741088316650178.
56. Li, L.Y. (2007). Exploring the Use of Focused Freewriting in Developing Academic Writing. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice. Vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 46-60, doi: 10.53761/1.4.1.5.
57. Pittam, G., Elander, J., Lusher, J., Fox, P., Payne, N. (2009). Student Beliefs and Attitudes about Authorial Identity in Academic Writing. Studies in Higher Education, doi: 10.1080/03075070802528270.
58. Bilki, Z. (2022). Levels of Textual Cohesion and the Construction Process of Advanced Second Language Readers. TESOL Journal. Vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1-17, doi: 10.1002/tesj.656.
59. Jarrah, A. M., Wardat, Y., Fidalgo, P. (2023). Using ChatGPT in Academic Writing Is (Not) a Form of Plagiarism: What Does the Literature Say? Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies. Vol. 13, no. 4, article no. e202346, doi: 10.30935/ojcmt/13572.
60. Hassani, H., Silva, E.S. (2023). The Role of ChatGPT in Data Science: How AI-Assisted Conversational Interfaces Are Revolutionizing the Field. Big Data and Cognitive Computing. Vol. 7, no. 2, article no. 62. doi: 10.3390/bdcc7020062.
61. Syamsi, K., Nugroho, A., Cahyani, I., Retnaningsih, W. (2025). EFL Pre-Service Teachers’ Acceptance of ChatGPT for Writing: A Sequential Explanatory Mixed-Method Study. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics. Vol. 15, no. 1, article no. 35, doi: 10.17509/ijal.v15i1.79615.
62. Salam, U. (2025). The Integration of ChatGPT in English for Foreign Language Course: Elevating AI Writing Assistant Acceptance. In: Integrating Artificial Intelligence Technologies into Language Teaching Education. Vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 145-165, doi: 10.4324/9781003662921-4.
63. MacCallum, R.C., Widaman, K.F., Preacher, K.J., Hong, S. (2001). Sample Size in Factor Analysis: The Role of Model Error. Multivariate Behavioral Research. Vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 611-637, doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3604_06.
64. Morgado, F.F.R., Meireles, J.F.F., Neves, C.M., Amaral, A.C.S., Ferreira, M.E.C. (2018). Scale Development: Ten Main Limitations And Recommendations To Improve Future Research Practices. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica. Vol. 30, doi: 10.1186/s41155-016-0057-1.
65. Wolf, E.J., Harrington, K.M., Clark, S.L., Miller, M.W. (2013). Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models: An Evaluation of Power, Bias, and Solution Propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement. Vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 913-934, doi: 10.1177/0013164413495237.
66. Harpe, S. E. (2015). How to Analyze Likert and Other Rating Scale Data. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning. Vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 836-850, doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2015.08.001.
67. Tesio, L., Caronni, A., Kumbhare, D., Scarano, S. (2024). Interpreting Results from Rasch Analysis 1: The “Most Likely” Measures Coming from the Model. Disability and Rehabilitation. Vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 591-603, doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2169771.
68. Faccio, F., Gandini, S., Renzi, C., Fioretti, C., Crico, C., Pravettoni, G. (2019). Development and Validation of the Family Resilience (FaRE) Questionnaire: An Observational Study in Italy. BMJ Open, doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024670.
69. Field, A. (2024). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. SAGE Publications. 1144 p. ISBN: 1529668700, 9781529668704.
70. Nguyen, H.V., Waller, N.G. (2023). Local Minima and Factor Rotations in Exploratory Factor Analysis. Psychological Methods. Vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1122-1141, doi: 10.1037/met0000467.
71. Sing, K., Gde, T., Sandila, B. (2025). Generative AI as a Dialogic Partner: Enhancing Multiple Perspectives, Reasoning, and Argumentation in Science Education with Customized Chatbots. Journal of Science Education and Technology, doi: 10.1007/s10956-025-10240-1.
72. Garcia-Varela, F., Bekerman, Z., Nussbaum, M., Mendoza, M., Montero, J. (2025). Reducing Interpretative Ambiguity in an Educational Environment with ChatGPT. Computers & Education. Vol. 225, article no. 105182, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105182.
73. Zhao, D. (2025). The Impact of AI-Enhanced Natural Language Processing Tools on Writing Proficiency: An Analysis of Language Precision, Content Summarization, and Creative Writing Facilitation. Education and Information Technologies. Vol. 30, pp. 8055-8086, doi: 10.1007/s10639-024-13145-5.
74. Garbuio, M., Lin, N. (2021). Innovative Idea Generation in Problem Finding: Abductive Reasoning, Cognitive Impediments, and the Promise Of Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Product Innovation Management, doi: 10.1111/jpim.12602.
75. Das Deep, P., Chen, Y. (2025). The Role of AI in Academic Writing: Impacts on Writing Skills, Critical Thinking, and Integrity in Higher Education. Societies. Vol. 15, no. 9, article no. 247, doi: 10.3390/soc15090247.
76. Ibrahim, K. (2023). Using AI-based Detectors to Control AI-assisted Plagiarism in ESL Writing: “The Terminator Versus the Machines”. Language Testing in Asia. Vol. 13, no. 1, 46. doi: 10.1186/s40468-023-00260-2.
77. Jarrah, A.M., Wardat, Y., Fidalgo, P. (2023). Using ChatGPT in Academic Writing Is (Not) a Form of Plagiarism: What Does the Literature Say? Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies. Vol. 13, no. 4, article no. e202346, doi: 10.30935/ojcmt/13572.
78. Marzuki, U., Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, Indrawati, I. (2023). The Impact of AI Writing Tools on the Content and Organization of Students’ Writing: EFL Teachers’ Perspective. Cogent Education. Vol. 10, no. 2, article no. 2236469, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469.
79. Darwin, Rusdin, D., Mukminatien, N., Suryati, N., Laksmi, E.D., Marzuki. (2024). Critical Thinking in the AI Era: An Exploration of EFL Students’ Perceptions, Benefits, and Limitations. Cogent Education. Vol. 11, no. 1, article no. 2290342, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2023.2290342.
80. Abbas, A. (2025). AI-Powered Concept Mapping in Collaborative and Individual Learning: Enhancing ICT-Based Reading Comprehension [Preprint]. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33749.13286.
81. Yusuf, A., Bello, S., Pervin, N., Tukur, A.K. (2024). Implementing a Proposed Framework for Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills in Synthesizing AI-Generated Texts. Thinking Skills and Creativity. Vol. 53, article no. 101619, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101619.
82. Golden, B. (2023). Enabling Critical Thinking Development in Higher Education Through the Use Of A Structured Planning Tool, doi: 10.1080/03323315.2023.2258497.
83. Lavi, R., Marti, D. (2023). A Proposed Case-Based Learning Framework for Fostering Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Creative and Critical Thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology. Vol. 32, pp. 898-911, doi: 10.1007/s10956-022-10017-w.
84. Shao, X. (2025). Artificial Intelligence Modelling Paths for Reasoning Argumentation Methods for Criminal Evidence. In: Communications in Computer and Information Science (pp. 35-52), doi: 10.1007/978-981-96-6310-1_3.
85. Schwarcz, D., Manning, S., Barry, P., Cleveland, D.R., Prescott, J.J., Rich, B. (2024). AI-Powered Lawyering: AI Reasoning Models, Retrieval Augmented Generation, and the Future of Legal Practice. Available at: https://www.alejandrobarros.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/IA-y-practica-juridica.pdf (accessed 20.01.2026).
86. Li, C., Wei, L., Lu, X. (2024). Task Complexity and L2 Writing Performance of Young Learners: Contributions of Cognitive and Affective Factors. Modern Language Journal. Vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 741-770, doi: 10.1111/modl.12954.
87. Heekerens, J. B., Eid, M., Heinitz, K., Merkle, B. (2022). Cognitive-Affective Responses to Online Positive-Psychological Interventions: The Effects of Optimistic, Grateful, and Self-Compassionate Writing. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being. Vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1105-1128, doi: 10.1111/aphw.12326.
88. Ebardo, R., Suarez, M.T. (2023). Do Cognitive, Affective and Social Needs Influence Mobile Learning Adoption in Emergency Remote Teaching? Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning. Vol. 18, article no. 014, doi: 10.58459/rptel.2023.
89. Livanec, S., Stumpf, M., Reuter, L., Fenn, J., Kiesel, A. (2022). Who’s Gonna Use This? Acceptance Prediction of Emerging Technologies with Cognitive-Affective Mapping and Transdisciplinary Considerations in the Anthropocene. Anthropocene Review. Vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 276-295, doi: 10.1177/20530196221078924.
90. Goulart, L., Matte, M.L., Mendoza, A., Alvarado, L., Veloso, I. (2024). AI or Student Writing? Analyzing the Situational and Linguistic Characteristics of Undergraduate Student Writing and AI-Generated Assignments. Journal of Second Language Writing. Vol. 66, article no. 101160, doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101160.
91. Steele, J.L. (2023). To GPT or Not GPT? Empowering Our Students to Learn with AI. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence. Vol. 5, article no. 100160, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100160.
92. Abdelhalim, S.M., Alsahil, A.A., Alsuhaibani, Z.A. (2025). Artificial Intelligence Tools and Literary Translation: A Comparative Investigation of ChatGPT and Google Translate from Novice and Advanced EFL Student Translators’ Perspectives. Cogent Arts & Humanities. Vol. 12, no. 1, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2025.2508031.
93. Bahari, A. (2025). Balancing Syntactic Complexity and Clarity: The Role of AI in Enhancing Academic Writing Proficiency. Saudi Journal of Language Studies. Vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 271-290, doi: 10.1108/SJLS-10-2024-0062.
94. Bal, M., Arseven, T. (2026). Students’ Writing Skills and Creativity in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review of Creativity Across Diverse AI-Supported Writing Contexts. Thinking Skills and Creativity. Vol. 60, article no. 102118, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102118.
95. Bhatti, A. (2026). Strategic Prompt Engineering for Enhancing AI-Generated Content in English Language Teaching: Empowering EFL Contexts. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching. Vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1-30, doi: 10.4018/IJCALLT.398504.
96. Aljohani, N.J. (2026). ChatGPT in Language Learning: A Systematic Review of Applications and Challenges. Social Sciences & Humanities Open. Vol. 13, article no. 102357, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102357.
97. Zhang, L., Li, J., Tsung, L. (2026). Activity Systems in Transition: GenAI-Mediated Thesis Writing Strategies and Contradictions among Chinese Doctoral Students in Australia. System. Vol. 138, article no. 104002, doi: 10.1016/j.system.2026.104002.
98. Xiao, Y., Liu, X., Yao, Y. (2025). Students’ Development of AI Metacognitive Awareness In: An EAP Course: A Qualitative Inspection Through the Experiential Learning Theory. System. Vol. 133, article no. 03790, doi: 10.1016/j.system.2025.103790.
99. Rezai, A., Namaziandost, E., Hwang, G. (2024). How Can ChatGPT Open Promising Avenues for L2 Development? A Phenomenological Study Involving EFL University Students in Iran. Computers in Human Behavior Reports. Vol. 16, article no. 100510, doi: 10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100510.
100. Perdana, A., S, V.B., Lee, W.E. (2026). From Automation to Augmentation: Genai’s Role in Promoting Students’ Cognitive and Ethical Development. Thinking Skills and Creativity. Vol. 59, article no. 102035, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102035.
101. Ho, C., Weatherly, C.A. (2026). Friend or Foe? Enhancing Creativity in K-12 Education Through AI. Thinking Skills and Creativity. Vol. 59, article no. 102030, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102030.
Рецензия
Просмотров:
347
JATS XML
Послать статью по эл. почте 