Preview

Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia

Advanced search

Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Engineering Profession: The Technical University Students’ Perception in the Context of Industry 4.0

https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2026-35-3-114-130

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is becoming an integral part of the engineering profession and the engineering education system in the era of Industry 4.0. The purpose of this study is to investigate how engineering students perceive the impact of AI on the future of the profession: the nature of work and its social status, including employment and income prospects. The study is based on the neo-Weberian approach in the sociology of professions, which views professional groups as status groups whose position in the labor market is determined by their monopoly on specialized knowledge and competencies. The empirical basis was a survey of students from technical universities in Moscow and Samara (N = 610, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow Polytechnic University, Samara University, 2024) and semi-structured expert interviews with practicing engineers and representatives of educational organizations (N = 5). The results show that students perceive AI primarily as a tool that optimizes the engineer’s work, rather than displacing it. At the same time, the social consequences of AI implementation, primarily employment prospects and wages, are significantly less optimistic. A more diverse use of AI in educational and professional activities is associated with greater optimism about professional prospects. It is concluded that the higher engineering education system needs to not only integrate AI tools into the educational process, but also to create a well-founded positive vision of the profession in the context of technology economy.

About the Authors

E. M. Kolesnikova
Institute of Sociology Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Elena M. Kolesnikova – Cand.Sci. (Sociology), Senior Researcher

24/35 Krzhizhanovskiy str., bld. 5, Moscow, 117218



I. A. Kudenko
Kudenko consulting Ltd. – Global Evaluation and Research Services
Germany

Irina A. Kudenko – Cand.Sci. (Geography), Principal Evaluator

40 Bischofsholer Damm, Hannover, 30173



References

1. Saks, М. (2020). Neo-Weberianism and the Professions. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. Vol. 6, pp. 28-41, doi: 10.31857/S013216250009646-3. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

2. Espina-Romero, L., Noroño Sánchez, J.G., Gutiérrez Hurtado, Dworaczek Conde, H., Solier Castro, Y., Cervera Cajo, L.E., Rio Corredoira, J. (2023). Which Industrial Sectors Are Affected by Artificial Intelligence? A Bibliometric Analysis of Trends and Perspectives. Sustainability. Vol. 15, no. 16, article no. 12176, doi: 10.3390/su151612176. 3. Lane, M., Saint-Martin, A. (2021). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Labour Market: What Do We Know So Far? OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers. OECD Publishing, Paris. Vol. 256, doi: 10.1787/7c895724-en.

3. Alekseeva, L., José, A., Mireia, G., Sampsa, S., Bledi, T. (2021). The Demand for AI Skills in the Labor Market. Labour Economics. Vol. 71, no. 6, article no. 102002, doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2021.102002.

4. Fossen, F., Sorgner, A. (2019) Mapping the Future of Occupations: Transformative and Destructive Effects of New Digital Technologies on Jobs. Foresight and STI Governance. Vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 10-18, doi: 10.17323/2500-2597.2019.2.10.18. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

5. Hadgraft, R.G., Kolmos, A. (2020). Emerging Learning Environments in Engineering Education. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education. Vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 3-16, doi: 10.1080/22054952.2020.1713522.

6. Levin, B.A., Piskunov, A.A., Poliakov, V.Yu., Savin, A.V. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Engineering Education. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 79-95, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2022-31-6-79-95. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

7. Ivakhnenko, E.N., Nikolskiy, V.S. (2023). ChatGPT in Higher Education and Science: A Threat or a Valuable Resource? Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 9-22, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-4-9-22. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

8. Ivanova, A.E., Tarasova, K.V., Talov, D.P. (2025). Between Interest and Skill: How Students Perceive and Use AI. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 34, no. 8-9, pp. 9-32, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-8-9-9-32. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

9. Kuzminov, Ya.I., Kruchinskaia, E.V., Gruzdev, I.A., Naumov, A.A. (2025). Falling Behind and Getting Ahead: Student Use of Generative AI in Education. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii =Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 9-35, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-6-9- 35. (in Russ., abstract in Eng.).

10. Aghion, P., Jones, B. F., Jones, C.I. (2017). Artificial Intelligence and Economic Growth. NBER Working Paper Series. No. 23928, NBER, doi: 10.3386/w23928.

11. Felten, E., Raj, M., Seamans, R. (2024). Generative AI Requires Broad Labor Policy. Considerations Communications of the ACM. Vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 29-32, doi: 10.1145/3637864.

12. Sage-Gavin, E., Vazirani, M., Hintermann, F. (2019). Getting Your Employees Ready for Work in the Age of AI. MIT Sloan Management Review. Available at: https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/getting-youremployees-ready-for-work-in-the-age-of-ai/ (accessed 27.12.2025).

13. Sheinbaum, V.S., Nikolskiy, V.S. (2024). Engineering Activity and Engineering Thinking in the Context of Artificial Intelligence Expansion. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 9-27, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-6-9-27. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

14. Popov, A.V., Soloveva, T.S. (2023). Employment Transformation in Russia from the Perspective of Cross-Country Comparisons. Population. Vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 110-122, doi: 10.19181/population.2023.26.1.9. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

15. Gimpelson, V.E., Kapeliushnikov, R.I. (2022). Work Routines and Risks of Automation in the Russian Labor Market. Voprosy Ekonomiki [Economic Issues]. Vol. 8, pp. 68-94, doi: 10.32609/0042-8736-2022-8-68-94. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

16. OECD Guidelines on Measuring the Quality of the Working Environment. OECD. 2017. OECD Publishing, Paris, doi: 10.1787/9789264278240-en.

17. Jha, S., Topol, E. (2016). Adapting to Artificial Intelligence: Radiologists and Pathologists as Information Specialists. JAMA. Vol. 316, no. 22, pp. 2353-2354, doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.17438.

18. Rakitov, A.I. (2018). Higher Education and Artificial Intelligence: Euphoria and Alarmism. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 41-49. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_35161092_43617837.pdf (accessed 27.12.2025). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

19. Polyakov, A.N., Belonovskaya, I.D. (2019). Training a New generation of Engineers for a Digital Economy. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 150- 159, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-7-150-159. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).


Review

Views: 241

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0869-3617 (Print)
ISSN 2072-0459 (Online)